Cargando…

Impact of hospital mergers on staff job satisfaction: a quantitative study

BACKGROUND: Hospital mergers began in the UK in the late 1990s to deal with underperformance. Despite their prevalence, there is a lack of research on how such organizational changes affect the staff morale. This study aims to assess the impact of NHS hospital mergers between financial years 2009/10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lim, Ka Keat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25495151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-12-70
_version_ 1782350444867092480
author Lim, Ka Keat
author_facet Lim, Ka Keat
author_sort Lim, Ka Keat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hospital mergers began in the UK in the late 1990s to deal with underperformance. Despite their prevalence, there is a lack of research on how such organizational changes affect the staff morale. This study aims to assess the impact of NHS hospital mergers between financial years 2009/10 and 2011/12 on staff job satisfaction and to identify factors contributing to satisfaction. METHODS: Data on staff job satisfaction were obtained from the annual NHS Staff Survey. A list of mergers was compiled using data provided by the Cooperation and Competition Panel and the Department of Health. Other sources of data included the NHS Hospital Estates and Facilities Statistics, the NHS ‘Quarter’ publication, official reports from health service regulators, individual hospitals’ annual accounts, data from the NHS Information Centre and the NHS Recurrent Revenue Allocations Exposition Book. Only full mergers of acute and mental health hospitals were analyzed. Propensity scores were generated using observable factors likely to affect merger decision to select three comparable hospitals for every constituent hospital in a merger to act as a control group. A difference-in-difference was estimated between baseline (3 years before merger approval) and each subsequent year up to 4 years post-merger, controlling for work environment, drivers of job satisfaction, data year, type of hospital and occupation group. RESULTS: There were nine mergers during the study period. Only job satisfaction scores 1 to 2 years before (0.03 to 0.04 point) and 1 year after merger approval (0.06 point) were higher (P < 0.01) than baseline. Robustness testing produced consistent findings. Assuming other conditions were equal, an increase in autonomy, staff support, perceived quality and job clarity ratings would increase job satisfaction scores. Higher job satisfaction scores were also associated with being classified as medical, dental, management or administrative staff and working in a mental health trust. CONCLUSION: Hospital mergers have a small, transient positive impact on staff job satisfaction in the year immediately before and after merger approval. Continuous staff support and management of staff expectations throughout a merger may help to increase staff job satisfaction during the challenging period of merger. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1478-4491-12-70) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4277837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42778372014-12-29 Impact of hospital mergers on staff job satisfaction: a quantitative study Lim, Ka Keat Hum Resour Health Research BACKGROUND: Hospital mergers began in the UK in the late 1990s to deal with underperformance. Despite their prevalence, there is a lack of research on how such organizational changes affect the staff morale. This study aims to assess the impact of NHS hospital mergers between financial years 2009/10 and 2011/12 on staff job satisfaction and to identify factors contributing to satisfaction. METHODS: Data on staff job satisfaction were obtained from the annual NHS Staff Survey. A list of mergers was compiled using data provided by the Cooperation and Competition Panel and the Department of Health. Other sources of data included the NHS Hospital Estates and Facilities Statistics, the NHS ‘Quarter’ publication, official reports from health service regulators, individual hospitals’ annual accounts, data from the NHS Information Centre and the NHS Recurrent Revenue Allocations Exposition Book. Only full mergers of acute and mental health hospitals were analyzed. Propensity scores were generated using observable factors likely to affect merger decision to select three comparable hospitals for every constituent hospital in a merger to act as a control group. A difference-in-difference was estimated between baseline (3 years before merger approval) and each subsequent year up to 4 years post-merger, controlling for work environment, drivers of job satisfaction, data year, type of hospital and occupation group. RESULTS: There were nine mergers during the study period. Only job satisfaction scores 1 to 2 years before (0.03 to 0.04 point) and 1 year after merger approval (0.06 point) were higher (P < 0.01) than baseline. Robustness testing produced consistent findings. Assuming other conditions were equal, an increase in autonomy, staff support, perceived quality and job clarity ratings would increase job satisfaction scores. Higher job satisfaction scores were also associated with being classified as medical, dental, management or administrative staff and working in a mental health trust. CONCLUSION: Hospital mergers have a small, transient positive impact on staff job satisfaction in the year immediately before and after merger approval. Continuous staff support and management of staff expectations throughout a merger may help to increase staff job satisfaction during the challenging period of merger. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1478-4491-12-70) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4277837/ /pubmed/25495151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-12-70 Text en © Lim; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lim, Ka Keat
Impact of hospital mergers on staff job satisfaction: a quantitative study
title Impact of hospital mergers on staff job satisfaction: a quantitative study
title_full Impact of hospital mergers on staff job satisfaction: a quantitative study
title_fullStr Impact of hospital mergers on staff job satisfaction: a quantitative study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of hospital mergers on staff job satisfaction: a quantitative study
title_short Impact of hospital mergers on staff job satisfaction: a quantitative study
title_sort impact of hospital mergers on staff job satisfaction: a quantitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25495151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-12-70
work_keys_str_mv AT limkakeat impactofhospitalmergersonstaffjobsatisfactionaquantitativestudy