Cargando…

The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of finishing time and polishing time on surface roughness and microhardness of nanofilled and hybrid resin composites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred disk composite specimens from micro hybrid composite and nanohybrid composite were prepare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaminedi, Raja Rajeswari, Penumatsa, Narendra Varma, Priya, Tulasi, Baroudi, Kusai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4278109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25558457
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.146211
_version_ 1782350470953566208
author Kaminedi, Raja Rajeswari
Penumatsa, Narendra Varma
Priya, Tulasi
Baroudi, Kusai
author_facet Kaminedi, Raja Rajeswari
Penumatsa, Narendra Varma
Priya, Tulasi
Baroudi, Kusai
author_sort Kaminedi, Raja Rajeswari
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of finishing time and polishing time on surface roughness and microhardness of nanofilled and hybrid resin composites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred disk composite specimens from micro hybrid composite and nanohybrid composite were prepared, 50 for each type of composite. The specimens were divided into five groups according to the time of finishing and polishing (immediate, 15 min, 24 h and dry). Composite under the Mylar strip without finishing and polishing was taken as the control group. Surface roughness was measured with environmental scanning electronic microscope (ESEM) and microhardness was determined using Vickers Microhardness Tester. Data collected were statistically analyzed by t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Turkey's post hoc test. RESULTS: Smooth surface with low hardness was obtained for the group under Mylar strip without finishing and polishing. The highest roughness was recorded for delayed finishing and polishing for both composites. Immediate finishing and polishing increased the surface hardness more than that in the control group in both types of composites. Dry finishing reduced the hardness significantly for micro hybrid composite, but resulted in the highest surface hardness for nanofilled composite. CONCLUSION: Immediate finishing and polishing under coolant resulted in the best surface smoothness and hardness values in micro hybrid composite; however, immediate dry finishing and polishing gave the best smoothness and hardness values in nanohybrid composite.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4278109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42781092015-01-02 The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations Kaminedi, Raja Rajeswari Penumatsa, Narendra Varma Priya, Tulasi Baroudi, Kusai J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of finishing time and polishing time on surface roughness and microhardness of nanofilled and hybrid resin composites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred disk composite specimens from micro hybrid composite and nanohybrid composite were prepared, 50 for each type of composite. The specimens were divided into five groups according to the time of finishing and polishing (immediate, 15 min, 24 h and dry). Composite under the Mylar strip without finishing and polishing was taken as the control group. Surface roughness was measured with environmental scanning electronic microscope (ESEM) and microhardness was determined using Vickers Microhardness Tester. Data collected were statistically analyzed by t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Turkey's post hoc test. RESULTS: Smooth surface with low hardness was obtained for the group under Mylar strip without finishing and polishing. The highest roughness was recorded for delayed finishing and polishing for both composites. Immediate finishing and polishing increased the surface hardness more than that in the control group in both types of composites. Dry finishing reduced the hardness significantly for micro hybrid composite, but resulted in the highest surface hardness for nanofilled composite. CONCLUSION: Immediate finishing and polishing under coolant resulted in the best surface smoothness and hardness values in micro hybrid composite; however, immediate dry finishing and polishing gave the best smoothness and hardness values in nanohybrid composite. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4278109/ /pubmed/25558457 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.146211 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaminedi, Raja Rajeswari
Penumatsa, Narendra Varma
Priya, Tulasi
Baroudi, Kusai
The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
title The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
title_full The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
title_fullStr The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
title_full_unstemmed The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
title_short The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
title_sort influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4278109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25558457
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.146211
work_keys_str_mv AT kaminedirajarajeswari theinfluenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations
AT penumatsanarendravarma theinfluenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations
AT priyatulasi theinfluenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations
AT baroudikusai theinfluenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations
AT kaminedirajarajeswari influenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations
AT penumatsanarendravarma influenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations
AT priyatulasi influenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations
AT baroudikusai influenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations