Cargando…
The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of finishing time and polishing time on surface roughness and microhardness of nanofilled and hybrid resin composites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred disk composite specimens from micro hybrid composite and nanohybrid composite were prepare...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4278109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25558457 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.146211 |
_version_ | 1782350470953566208 |
---|---|
author | Kaminedi, Raja Rajeswari Penumatsa, Narendra Varma Priya, Tulasi Baroudi, Kusai |
author_facet | Kaminedi, Raja Rajeswari Penumatsa, Narendra Varma Priya, Tulasi Baroudi, Kusai |
author_sort | Kaminedi, Raja Rajeswari |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of finishing time and polishing time on surface roughness and microhardness of nanofilled and hybrid resin composites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred disk composite specimens from micro hybrid composite and nanohybrid composite were prepared, 50 for each type of composite. The specimens were divided into five groups according to the time of finishing and polishing (immediate, 15 min, 24 h and dry). Composite under the Mylar strip without finishing and polishing was taken as the control group. Surface roughness was measured with environmental scanning electronic microscope (ESEM) and microhardness was determined using Vickers Microhardness Tester. Data collected were statistically analyzed by t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Turkey's post hoc test. RESULTS: Smooth surface with low hardness was obtained for the group under Mylar strip without finishing and polishing. The highest roughness was recorded for delayed finishing and polishing for both composites. Immediate finishing and polishing increased the surface hardness more than that in the control group in both types of composites. Dry finishing reduced the hardness significantly for micro hybrid composite, but resulted in the highest surface hardness for nanofilled composite. CONCLUSION: Immediate finishing and polishing under coolant resulted in the best surface smoothness and hardness values in micro hybrid composite; however, immediate dry finishing and polishing gave the best smoothness and hardness values in nanohybrid composite. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4278109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42781092015-01-02 The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations Kaminedi, Raja Rajeswari Penumatsa, Narendra Varma Priya, Tulasi Baroudi, Kusai J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of finishing time and polishing time on surface roughness and microhardness of nanofilled and hybrid resin composites. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hundred disk composite specimens from micro hybrid composite and nanohybrid composite were prepared, 50 for each type of composite. The specimens were divided into five groups according to the time of finishing and polishing (immediate, 15 min, 24 h and dry). Composite under the Mylar strip without finishing and polishing was taken as the control group. Surface roughness was measured with environmental scanning electronic microscope (ESEM) and microhardness was determined using Vickers Microhardness Tester. Data collected were statistically analyzed by t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Turkey's post hoc test. RESULTS: Smooth surface with low hardness was obtained for the group under Mylar strip without finishing and polishing. The highest roughness was recorded for delayed finishing and polishing for both composites. Immediate finishing and polishing increased the surface hardness more than that in the control group in both types of composites. Dry finishing reduced the hardness significantly for micro hybrid composite, but resulted in the highest surface hardness for nanofilled composite. CONCLUSION: Immediate finishing and polishing under coolant resulted in the best surface smoothness and hardness values in micro hybrid composite; however, immediate dry finishing and polishing gave the best smoothness and hardness values in nanohybrid composite. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4278109/ /pubmed/25558457 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.146211 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kaminedi, Raja Rajeswari Penumatsa, Narendra Varma Priya, Tulasi Baroudi, Kusai The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations |
title | The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
|
title_full | The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
|
title_fullStr | The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
|
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
|
title_short | The influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations
|
title_sort | influence of finishing/polishing time and cooling system on surface roughness and microhardness of two different types of composite resin restorations |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4278109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25558457 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.146211 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaminedirajarajeswari theinfluenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations AT penumatsanarendravarma theinfluenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations AT priyatulasi theinfluenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations AT baroudikusai theinfluenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations AT kaminedirajarajeswari influenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations AT penumatsanarendravarma influenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations AT priyatulasi influenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations AT baroudikusai influenceoffinishingpolishingtimeandcoolingsystemonsurfaceroughnessandmicrohardnessoftwodifferenttypesofcompositeresinrestorations |