Cargando…

How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?

Journals and institutions have important complementary roles to play in cases of suspected research and publication misconduct. Journals should take responsibility for everything they publish and should alert institutions to cases of possible serious misconduct but should not attempt to investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wager, Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Microbiology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4278465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25574266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.829
_version_ 1782350525372563456
author Wager, Elizabeth
author_facet Wager, Elizabeth
author_sort Wager, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description Journals and institutions have important complementary roles to play in cases of suspected research and publication misconduct. Journals should take responsibility for everything they publish and should alert institutions to cases of possible serious misconduct but should not attempt to investigate such cases. Institutions should take responsibility for their researchers and for investigating cases of possible misconduct and for ensuring journals are informed if they have published unreliable or misleading articles so that these can be retracted or corrected. Journals and institutions should have policies in place for handling such cases and these policies should respect their different roles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4278465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher American Society of Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42784652015-01-08 How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct? Wager, Elizabeth J Microbiol Biol Educ Research Community Journals and institutions have important complementary roles to play in cases of suspected research and publication misconduct. Journals should take responsibility for everything they publish and should alert institutions to cases of possible serious misconduct but should not attempt to investigate such cases. Institutions should take responsibility for their researchers and for investigating cases of possible misconduct and for ensuring journals are informed if they have published unreliable or misleading articles so that these can be retracted or corrected. Journals and institutions should have policies in place for handling such cases and these policies should respect their different roles. American Society of Microbiology 2014-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4278465/ /pubmed/25574266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.829 Text en ©2014 Author(s). Published by the American Society for Microbiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ and https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode), which grants the public the nonexclusive right to copy, distribute, or display the published work.
spellingShingle Research Community
Wager, Elizabeth
How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
title How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
title_full How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
title_fullStr How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
title_full_unstemmed How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
title_short How Should Journal Editors Respond to Cases of Suspected Misconduct?
title_sort how should journal editors respond to cases of suspected misconduct?
topic Research Community
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4278465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25574266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.829
work_keys_str_mv AT wagerelizabeth howshouldjournaleditorsrespondtocasesofsuspectedmisconduct