Cargando…

Differentiation between Malignant and Benign Solitary Lesions in the Liver with (18)FDG PET/CT: Accuracy of Age-related Diagnostic Standard

Objective: This study was to determine the reliability of age-stratified diagnostic index in differential diagnosis of malignant and benign solitary lesions in the liver using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)FDG PET/CT). Methods: The enrolled 272...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xia, Qian, Feng, Yuanbo, Wu, Cheng, Huang, Gang, Liu, Jianjun, Chen, Tao, Sun, Xiaoguang, Song, Shaoli, Tong, Linjun, Ni, Yicheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4278913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25553087
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.10422
_version_ 1782350600107720704
author Xia, Qian
Feng, Yuanbo
Wu, Cheng
Huang, Gang
Liu, Jianjun
Chen, Tao
Sun, Xiaoguang
Song, Shaoli
Tong, Linjun
Ni, Yicheng
author_facet Xia, Qian
Feng, Yuanbo
Wu, Cheng
Huang, Gang
Liu, Jianjun
Chen, Tao
Sun, Xiaoguang
Song, Shaoli
Tong, Linjun
Ni, Yicheng
author_sort Xia, Qian
collection PubMed
description Objective: This study was to determine the reliability of age-stratified diagnostic index in differential diagnosis of malignant and benign solitary lesions in the liver using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)FDG PET/CT). Methods: The enrolled 272 patients with solitary lesions in the liver were divided into three age groups, younger group (under 50 years), middle-aged group (50-69 years), and elderly group (70 years and above). Patients' ages were compared, and the optimal cut-offs of the standard uptake value (SUV) ratio (tumor-to-non-tumor ratio of the SUV), as well as areas under the curves (AUC), were evaluated in terms of malignant and benign lesions in each age group by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Based on optimal cut-offs, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy were calculated, and the diagnostic accordance rate was compared between each age group and all patients, supported by (18)FDG PET/CT imaging data. Results: There was a significant age difference between the malignant and benign groups (t=3.905 p=0.0001). ROC analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value in all patients, younger group, middle-aged group and elderly group was 1.25, 1.17, 1.45 and 1.25 for SUVratio, and 0.856, 0.962, 0.650, 0.973 for AUC. The chi-square test proved that diagnostic accordance rate of (18)FDG PET/CT in younger group and elderly group were superior to that in all patients (χ(2)=13.352, P=0.0003) and (χ(2)=8.494, P=0.0036). Conversely, overall diagnostic accordance rate in all patient group was higher than that in middle-aged group (χ(2)=9.057, P=0.0026). Representative (18)FDG PET/CT imaging findings are demonstrated. Conclusion: This study indicates that diagnostic optimal cut-offs of SUVratio of liver solitary lesions of (18)FDG PET/CT were different in each age group. In addition, the diagnostic performance of SUVratio was better in younger and elderly groups than that in all patients, and was poorer in middle-aged group than that in all patients. Therefore, age difference appears to be one of the important factors for discriminating malignant liver lesions from benign ones using (18 )FDG PET/CT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4278913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42789132015-01-01 Differentiation between Malignant and Benign Solitary Lesions in the Liver with (18)FDG PET/CT: Accuracy of Age-related Diagnostic Standard Xia, Qian Feng, Yuanbo Wu, Cheng Huang, Gang Liu, Jianjun Chen, Tao Sun, Xiaoguang Song, Shaoli Tong, Linjun Ni, Yicheng J Cancer Research Paper Objective: This study was to determine the reliability of age-stratified diagnostic index in differential diagnosis of malignant and benign solitary lesions in the liver using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ((18)FDG PET/CT). Methods: The enrolled 272 patients with solitary lesions in the liver were divided into three age groups, younger group (under 50 years), middle-aged group (50-69 years), and elderly group (70 years and above). Patients' ages were compared, and the optimal cut-offs of the standard uptake value (SUV) ratio (tumor-to-non-tumor ratio of the SUV), as well as areas under the curves (AUC), were evaluated in terms of malignant and benign lesions in each age group by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Based on optimal cut-offs, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy were calculated, and the diagnostic accordance rate was compared between each age group and all patients, supported by (18)FDG PET/CT imaging data. Results: There was a significant age difference between the malignant and benign groups (t=3.905 p=0.0001). ROC analysis showed that the optimal cut-off value in all patients, younger group, middle-aged group and elderly group was 1.25, 1.17, 1.45 and 1.25 for SUVratio, and 0.856, 0.962, 0.650, 0.973 for AUC. The chi-square test proved that diagnostic accordance rate of (18)FDG PET/CT in younger group and elderly group were superior to that in all patients (χ(2)=13.352, P=0.0003) and (χ(2)=8.494, P=0.0036). Conversely, overall diagnostic accordance rate in all patient group was higher than that in middle-aged group (χ(2)=9.057, P=0.0026). Representative (18)FDG PET/CT imaging findings are demonstrated. Conclusion: This study indicates that diagnostic optimal cut-offs of SUVratio of liver solitary lesions of (18)FDG PET/CT were different in each age group. In addition, the diagnostic performance of SUVratio was better in younger and elderly groups than that in all patients, and was poorer in middle-aged group than that in all patients. Therefore, age difference appears to be one of the important factors for discriminating malignant liver lesions from benign ones using (18 )FDG PET/CT. Ivyspring International Publisher 2015-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4278913/ /pubmed/25553087 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.10422 Text en © Ivyspring International Publisher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). Reproduction is permitted for personal, noncommercial use, provided that the article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Xia, Qian
Feng, Yuanbo
Wu, Cheng
Huang, Gang
Liu, Jianjun
Chen, Tao
Sun, Xiaoguang
Song, Shaoli
Tong, Linjun
Ni, Yicheng
Differentiation between Malignant and Benign Solitary Lesions in the Liver with (18)FDG PET/CT: Accuracy of Age-related Diagnostic Standard
title Differentiation between Malignant and Benign Solitary Lesions in the Liver with (18)FDG PET/CT: Accuracy of Age-related Diagnostic Standard
title_full Differentiation between Malignant and Benign Solitary Lesions in the Liver with (18)FDG PET/CT: Accuracy of Age-related Diagnostic Standard
title_fullStr Differentiation between Malignant and Benign Solitary Lesions in the Liver with (18)FDG PET/CT: Accuracy of Age-related Diagnostic Standard
title_full_unstemmed Differentiation between Malignant and Benign Solitary Lesions in the Liver with (18)FDG PET/CT: Accuracy of Age-related Diagnostic Standard
title_short Differentiation between Malignant and Benign Solitary Lesions in the Liver with (18)FDG PET/CT: Accuracy of Age-related Diagnostic Standard
title_sort differentiation between malignant and benign solitary lesions in the liver with (18)fdg pet/ct: accuracy of age-related diagnostic standard
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4278913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25553087
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.10422
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaqian differentiationbetweenmalignantandbenignsolitarylesionsintheliverwith18fdgpetctaccuracyofagerelateddiagnosticstandard
AT fengyuanbo differentiationbetweenmalignantandbenignsolitarylesionsintheliverwith18fdgpetctaccuracyofagerelateddiagnosticstandard
AT wucheng differentiationbetweenmalignantandbenignsolitarylesionsintheliverwith18fdgpetctaccuracyofagerelateddiagnosticstandard
AT huanggang differentiationbetweenmalignantandbenignsolitarylesionsintheliverwith18fdgpetctaccuracyofagerelateddiagnosticstandard
AT liujianjun differentiationbetweenmalignantandbenignsolitarylesionsintheliverwith18fdgpetctaccuracyofagerelateddiagnosticstandard
AT chentao differentiationbetweenmalignantandbenignsolitarylesionsintheliverwith18fdgpetctaccuracyofagerelateddiagnosticstandard
AT sunxiaoguang differentiationbetweenmalignantandbenignsolitarylesionsintheliverwith18fdgpetctaccuracyofagerelateddiagnosticstandard
AT songshaoli differentiationbetweenmalignantandbenignsolitarylesionsintheliverwith18fdgpetctaccuracyofagerelateddiagnosticstandard
AT tonglinjun differentiationbetweenmalignantandbenignsolitarylesionsintheliverwith18fdgpetctaccuracyofagerelateddiagnosticstandard
AT niyicheng differentiationbetweenmalignantandbenignsolitarylesionsintheliverwith18fdgpetctaccuracyofagerelateddiagnosticstandard