Cargando…

Individualised, flexible postnatal care: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Postnatal care in hospital is often provided using defined care pathways, with limited opportunity for more refined and individualised care. We explored whether a tertiary maternity service could provide flexible, individualised early postnatal care for women in a dynamic and timely mann...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forster, Della A, Savage, Tracey L, McLachlan, Helen L, Gold, Lisa, Farrell, Tanya, Rayner, Jo, Yelland, Jane, Rankin, Bree, Lovell, Belinda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4279591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25421495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0569-2
_version_ 1782350723224174592
author Forster, Della A
Savage, Tracey L
McLachlan, Helen L
Gold, Lisa
Farrell, Tanya
Rayner, Jo
Yelland, Jane
Rankin, Bree
Lovell, Belinda
author_facet Forster, Della A
Savage, Tracey L
McLachlan, Helen L
Gold, Lisa
Farrell, Tanya
Rayner, Jo
Yelland, Jane
Rankin, Bree
Lovell, Belinda
author_sort Forster, Della A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postnatal care in hospital is often provided using defined care pathways, with limited opportunity for more refined and individualised care. We explored whether a tertiary maternity service could provide flexible, individualised early postnatal care for women in a dynamic and timely manner, and if this approach was acceptable to women. METHODS: A feasibility study was designed to inform a future randomised controlled trial to evaluate an alternative approach to postnatal care. English-speaking women at low risk of medical complications were recruited around 26 weeks gestation to explore their willingness to participate in a study of a new, flexible model of care that involved antenatal planning for early postpartum discharge with additional home-based postnatal care. The earlier women were discharged from hospital, the more home-based visits they were eligible to receive. Program uptake was measured, women’s views obtained by a postal survey sent at eight weeks postpartum and clinical data collected from medical records. RESULTS: Study uptake was 39% (109/277 approached). Most women (n=103) completed a postnatal care plan during pregnancy; 17% planned to leave hospital within 12 hours of giving birth and 36% planned to stay 48 hours. At eight weeks postpartum most women (90%) were positive about the concept and 88% would opt for the same program again. Of the 28% who stayed in hospital for the length they had planned, less than half (43%) received the appropriate number of home visits, and only 41% were given an option for the timing of the visit. Most (62%) stayed in hospital longer than planned (probably due to clinical complications); 11% stayed shorter than planned. CONCLUSIONS: Women were very positive about individualised postnatal care planning that commenced during pregnancy. Given the hospital stay may be impacted by clinical factors, individualised care planning needs to continue into the postnatal period to take into account circumstances which cannot be planned for during pregnancy. However, individualised care planning during the postnatal period which incorporates a high level of flexibility may be challenging for organisations to manage and implement, and a randomised controlled trial of such an approach may not be feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4279591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42795912014-12-31 Individualised, flexible postnatal care: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial Forster, Della A Savage, Tracey L McLachlan, Helen L Gold, Lisa Farrell, Tanya Rayner, Jo Yelland, Jane Rankin, Bree Lovell, Belinda BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Postnatal care in hospital is often provided using defined care pathways, with limited opportunity for more refined and individualised care. We explored whether a tertiary maternity service could provide flexible, individualised early postnatal care for women in a dynamic and timely manner, and if this approach was acceptable to women. METHODS: A feasibility study was designed to inform a future randomised controlled trial to evaluate an alternative approach to postnatal care. English-speaking women at low risk of medical complications were recruited around 26 weeks gestation to explore their willingness to participate in a study of a new, flexible model of care that involved antenatal planning for early postpartum discharge with additional home-based postnatal care. The earlier women were discharged from hospital, the more home-based visits they were eligible to receive. Program uptake was measured, women’s views obtained by a postal survey sent at eight weeks postpartum and clinical data collected from medical records. RESULTS: Study uptake was 39% (109/277 approached). Most women (n=103) completed a postnatal care plan during pregnancy; 17% planned to leave hospital within 12 hours of giving birth and 36% planned to stay 48 hours. At eight weeks postpartum most women (90%) were positive about the concept and 88% would opt for the same program again. Of the 28% who stayed in hospital for the length they had planned, less than half (43%) received the appropriate number of home visits, and only 41% were given an option for the timing of the visit. Most (62%) stayed in hospital longer than planned (probably due to clinical complications); 11% stayed shorter than planned. CONCLUSIONS: Women were very positive about individualised postnatal care planning that commenced during pregnancy. Given the hospital stay may be impacted by clinical factors, individualised care planning needs to continue into the postnatal period to take into account circumstances which cannot be planned for during pregnancy. However, individualised care planning during the postnatal period which incorporates a high level of flexibility may be challenging for organisations to manage and implement, and a randomised controlled trial of such an approach may not be feasible. BioMed Central 2014-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4279591/ /pubmed/25421495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0569-2 Text en © Forster et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Forster, Della A
Savage, Tracey L
McLachlan, Helen L
Gold, Lisa
Farrell, Tanya
Rayner, Jo
Yelland, Jane
Rankin, Bree
Lovell, Belinda
Individualised, flexible postnatal care: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial
title Individualised, flexible postnatal care: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Individualised, flexible postnatal care: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Individualised, flexible postnatal care: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Individualised, flexible postnatal care: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Individualised, flexible postnatal care: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort individualised, flexible postnatal care: a feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4279591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25421495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0569-2
work_keys_str_mv AT forsterdellaa individualisedflexiblepostnatalcareafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT savagetraceyl individualisedflexiblepostnatalcareafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mclachlanhelenl individualisedflexiblepostnatalcareafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT goldlisa individualisedflexiblepostnatalcareafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT farrelltanya individualisedflexiblepostnatalcareafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT raynerjo individualisedflexiblepostnatalcareafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yellandjane individualisedflexiblepostnatalcareafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rankinbree individualisedflexiblepostnatalcareafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lovellbelinda individualisedflexiblepostnatalcareafeasibilitystudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrial