Cargando…

Comparison between two portal laparoscopy and open surgery for ovariectomy in dogs

Ovariectomy (OVE) is a routine surgical procedure for neutering in small animal practice. Laparoscopy is a new surgical technique which contains advantages such as less trauma, smaller incision and excellent visualization than traditional open surgery. The present study was conducted to examine the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shariati, Elnaz, Bakhtiari, Jalal, Khalaj, Alireza, Niasari-Naslaji, Amir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Urmia University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4279650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25568722
_version_ 1782350737132486656
author Shariati, Elnaz
Bakhtiari, Jalal
Khalaj, Alireza
Niasari-Naslaji, Amir
author_facet Shariati, Elnaz
Bakhtiari, Jalal
Khalaj, Alireza
Niasari-Naslaji, Amir
author_sort Shariati, Elnaz
collection PubMed
description Ovariectomy (OVE) is a routine surgical procedure for neutering in small animal practice. Laparoscopy is a new surgical technique which contains advantages such as less trauma, smaller incision and excellent visualization than traditional open surgery. The present study was conducted to examine the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic procedure through two portal comparing with the conventional open surgery for OVE in healthy female bitches (n=16). Dogs were divided in two equal groups. In laparoscopic group, two 5 and 10 mm portals were inserted; First in the umbilicus for introducing the camera and the second, caudal to the umbilicus for inserting the forceps. Laparoscopic procedure involved grasping and tacking the ovary to the abdominal wall, followed by electrocautery, resection and removal of the ovary. In open surgery, routine OVE was conducted through an incision from umbilicus to caudal midline. Mean operative time, total length of scar, blood loss, clinical and blood parameters and all intra and post-operative complications were recorded in both groups. Mean operative time, total length of scar, blood loss and post-operative adhesions were significantly less in laparoscopic group compared with open surgery. In conclusion, laparoscopic OVE is an acceptable procedure due to more advantages in comparison with traditional OVE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4279650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Urmia University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42796502015-01-07 Comparison between two portal laparoscopy and open surgery for ovariectomy in dogs Shariati, Elnaz Bakhtiari, Jalal Khalaj, Alireza Niasari-Naslaji, Amir Vet Res Forum Original Article Ovariectomy (OVE) is a routine surgical procedure for neutering in small animal practice. Laparoscopy is a new surgical technique which contains advantages such as less trauma, smaller incision and excellent visualization than traditional open surgery. The present study was conducted to examine the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic procedure through two portal comparing with the conventional open surgery for OVE in healthy female bitches (n=16). Dogs were divided in two equal groups. In laparoscopic group, two 5 and 10 mm portals were inserted; First in the umbilicus for introducing the camera and the second, caudal to the umbilicus for inserting the forceps. Laparoscopic procedure involved grasping and tacking the ovary to the abdominal wall, followed by electrocautery, resection and removal of the ovary. In open surgery, routine OVE was conducted through an incision from umbilicus to caudal midline. Mean operative time, total length of scar, blood loss, clinical and blood parameters and all intra and post-operative complications were recorded in both groups. Mean operative time, total length of scar, blood loss and post-operative adhesions were significantly less in laparoscopic group compared with open surgery. In conclusion, laparoscopic OVE is an acceptable procedure due to more advantages in comparison with traditional OVE. Urmia University Press 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4279650/ /pubmed/25568722 Text en © 2014 Urmia University. All rights reserved. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shariati, Elnaz
Bakhtiari, Jalal
Khalaj, Alireza
Niasari-Naslaji, Amir
Comparison between two portal laparoscopy and open surgery for ovariectomy in dogs
title Comparison between two portal laparoscopy and open surgery for ovariectomy in dogs
title_full Comparison between two portal laparoscopy and open surgery for ovariectomy in dogs
title_fullStr Comparison between two portal laparoscopy and open surgery for ovariectomy in dogs
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between two portal laparoscopy and open surgery for ovariectomy in dogs
title_short Comparison between two portal laparoscopy and open surgery for ovariectomy in dogs
title_sort comparison between two portal laparoscopy and open surgery for ovariectomy in dogs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4279650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25568722
work_keys_str_mv AT shariatielnaz comparisonbetweentwoportallaparoscopyandopensurgeryforovariectomyindogs
AT bakhtiarijalal comparisonbetweentwoportallaparoscopyandopensurgeryforovariectomyindogs
AT khalajalireza comparisonbetweentwoportallaparoscopyandopensurgeryforovariectomyindogs
AT niasarinaslajiamir comparisonbetweentwoportallaparoscopyandopensurgeryforovariectomyindogs