Cargando…
Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions
Species distribution models (SDMs) are increasingly proposed to support conservation decision making. However, evidence of SDMs supporting solutions for on-ground conservation problems is still scarce in the scientific literature. Here, we show that successful examples exist but are still largely hi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4280402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24134332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12189 |
_version_ | 1782350842240696320 |
---|---|
author | Guisan, Antoine Tingley, Reid Baumgartner, John B Naujokaitis-Lewis, Ilona Sutcliffe, Patricia R Tulloch, Ayesha I T Regan, Tracey J Brotons, Lluis McDonald-Madden, Eve Mantyka-Pringle, Chrystal Martin, Tara G Rhodes, Jonathan R Maggini, Ramona Setterfield, Samantha A Elith, Jane Schwartz, Mark W Wintle, Brendan A Broennimann, Olivier Austin, Mike Ferrier, Simon Kearney, Michael R Possingham, Hugh P Buckley, Yvonne M |
author_facet | Guisan, Antoine Tingley, Reid Baumgartner, John B Naujokaitis-Lewis, Ilona Sutcliffe, Patricia R Tulloch, Ayesha I T Regan, Tracey J Brotons, Lluis McDonald-Madden, Eve Mantyka-Pringle, Chrystal Martin, Tara G Rhodes, Jonathan R Maggini, Ramona Setterfield, Samantha A Elith, Jane Schwartz, Mark W Wintle, Brendan A Broennimann, Olivier Austin, Mike Ferrier, Simon Kearney, Michael R Possingham, Hugh P Buckley, Yvonne M |
author_sort | Guisan, Antoine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Species distribution models (SDMs) are increasingly proposed to support conservation decision making. However, evidence of SDMs supporting solutions for on-ground conservation problems is still scarce in the scientific literature. Here, we show that successful examples exist but are still largely hidden in the grey literature, and thus less accessible for analysis and learning. Furthermore, the decision framework within which SDMs are used is rarely made explicit. Using case studies from biological invasions, identification of critical habitats, reserve selection and translocation of endangered species, we propose that SDMs may be tailored to suit a range of decision-making contexts when used within a structured and transparent decision-making process. To construct appropriate SDMs to more effectively guide conservation actions, modellers need to better understand the decision process, and decision makers need to provide feedback to modellers regarding the actual use of SDMs to support conservation decisions. This could be facilitated by individuals or institutions playing the role of ‘translators’ between modellers and decision makers. We encourage species distribution modellers to get involved in real decision-making processes that will benefit from their technical input; this strategy has the potential to better bridge theory and practice, and contribute to improve both scientific knowledge and conservation outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4280402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42804022015-01-06 Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions Guisan, Antoine Tingley, Reid Baumgartner, John B Naujokaitis-Lewis, Ilona Sutcliffe, Patricia R Tulloch, Ayesha I T Regan, Tracey J Brotons, Lluis McDonald-Madden, Eve Mantyka-Pringle, Chrystal Martin, Tara G Rhodes, Jonathan R Maggini, Ramona Setterfield, Samantha A Elith, Jane Schwartz, Mark W Wintle, Brendan A Broennimann, Olivier Austin, Mike Ferrier, Simon Kearney, Michael R Possingham, Hugh P Buckley, Yvonne M Ecol Lett Idea and Perspective Species distribution models (SDMs) are increasingly proposed to support conservation decision making. However, evidence of SDMs supporting solutions for on-ground conservation problems is still scarce in the scientific literature. Here, we show that successful examples exist but are still largely hidden in the grey literature, and thus less accessible for analysis and learning. Furthermore, the decision framework within which SDMs are used is rarely made explicit. Using case studies from biological invasions, identification of critical habitats, reserve selection and translocation of endangered species, we propose that SDMs may be tailored to suit a range of decision-making contexts when used within a structured and transparent decision-making process. To construct appropriate SDMs to more effectively guide conservation actions, modellers need to better understand the decision process, and decision makers need to provide feedback to modellers regarding the actual use of SDMs to support conservation decisions. This could be facilitated by individuals or institutions playing the role of ‘translators’ between modellers and decision makers. We encourage species distribution modellers to get involved in real decision-making processes that will benefit from their technical input; this strategy has the potential to better bridge theory and practice, and contribute to improve both scientific knowledge and conservation outcomes. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2013-12 2013-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4280402/ /pubmed/24134332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12189 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and CNRS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Idea and Perspective Guisan, Antoine Tingley, Reid Baumgartner, John B Naujokaitis-Lewis, Ilona Sutcliffe, Patricia R Tulloch, Ayesha I T Regan, Tracey J Brotons, Lluis McDonald-Madden, Eve Mantyka-Pringle, Chrystal Martin, Tara G Rhodes, Jonathan R Maggini, Ramona Setterfield, Samantha A Elith, Jane Schwartz, Mark W Wintle, Brendan A Broennimann, Olivier Austin, Mike Ferrier, Simon Kearney, Michael R Possingham, Hugh P Buckley, Yvonne M Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions |
title | Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions |
title_full | Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions |
title_fullStr | Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions |
title_short | Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions |
title_sort | predicting species distributions for conservation decisions |
topic | Idea and Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4280402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24134332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ele.12189 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guisanantoine predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT tingleyreid predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT baumgartnerjohnb predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT naujokaitislewisilona predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT sutcliffepatriciar predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT tullochayeshait predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT regantraceyj predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT brotonslluis predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT mcdonaldmaddeneve predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT mantykapringlechrystal predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT martintarag predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT rhodesjonathanr predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT magginiramona predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT setterfieldsamanthaa predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT elithjane predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT schwartzmarkw predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT wintlebrendana predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT broennimannolivier predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT austinmike predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT ferriersimon predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT kearneymichaelr predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT possinghamhughp predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions AT buckleyyvonnem predictingspeciesdistributionsforconservationdecisions |