Bony abnormalities of the hip joint: a new comprehensive, reliable and radiation-free measurement method using magnetic resonance imaging

The objective of this study was to develop comprehensive and reliable radiation-free methods to quantify femoral and acetabular morphology using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty-two hips [16 subjects, 6 with intra-articular hip disorder (IAHD); 10 controls] were included. A 1.5-T magnetic resonance system was used to obtain three-dimensional fat-suppressed gradient-echo images at the pelvis and distal femora. After acquisition, pelvic images were post-processed to correct for coronal, axial and sagittal rotation. Measurements performed included acetabular version (AV), femoral version (FV), lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), femoral neck angle (FNA) and alpha angle (AA) at 3, 2, 1 and 12 a.m. Two experienced raters, a musculoskeletal radiologist and an orthopedic physical therapist, and a novice rater, a research assistant, completed reliability testing. Raters measured all hips twice with minimum 2 weeks between sessions. Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were used to determine rater reliability; standard error of measurements was reported to estimate the reasonable limits of the expected error in the different raters’ scores. Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent for all raters for AV, FV, FNA and LCEA (ICCs: 0.82–0.98); good to excellent between experienced raters (ICCs: 0.78–0.86) and poor to good between novice and experienced raters (ICCs: 0.23–0.78) for AA. Intra-rater reliability was good to excellent for all raters for AV, FV and FNA (ICCs: 0.93–0.99); for one experienced and novice rater for LCEA (ICCs: 0.84–0.89); moderate to excellent for the experienced raters for AA (ICCs: 0.72-0.89). Intra-rater reliability was poor for the second experienced rater for LCEA (ICC: 0.56), due to a single measurement error and for the novice rater for AA (ICCs: 0.17–0.38). We described MRI methods to comprehensively assess femoral and acetabular morphology. Measurements such as AV, FV and FNA and the LCEA can be made reliably by both experienced and novice raters; however, the AA measurement was reliable only among experienced raters.