Cargando…
Measuring Visual Function Using the MultiQuity System: Comparison with an Established Device
Purpose. To compare measures of visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) from the Thompson Xpert 2000 and MultiQuity (MiQ) devices. Methods. Corrected distance VA (CDVA) and CS were measured in the right eye of 73 subjects, on an established system (Thompson Xpert) and a novel system (MiQ 72...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4280651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25580278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/180317 |
_version_ | 1782350873693782016 |
---|---|
author | Smolarek-Kasprzak, Patrycja Nolan, John M. Beatty, Stephen Dennison, Jessica Akuffo, Kwadwo Owusu Kuchling, Robert Stack, Jim O'Regan, Graham |
author_facet | Smolarek-Kasprzak, Patrycja Nolan, John M. Beatty, Stephen Dennison, Jessica Akuffo, Kwadwo Owusu Kuchling, Robert Stack, Jim O'Regan, Graham |
author_sort | Smolarek-Kasprzak, Patrycja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. To compare measures of visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) from the Thompson Xpert 2000 and MultiQuity (MiQ) devices. Methods. Corrected distance VA (CDVA) and CS were measured in the right eye of 73 subjects, on an established system (Thompson Xpert) and a novel system (MiQ 720). Regression was used to convert MiQ scores into the Thompson scale. Agreement between the converted MiQ and Thompson scores was investigated using standard agreement indices. Test-retest variability for both devices was also investigated, for a separate sample of 24 subjects. Results. For CDVA, agreement was strong between the MiQ and Thomson devices (accuracy = 0.993, precision = 0.889, CCC = 0.883). For CS, agreement was also strong (accuracy = 0.996, precision = 0.911, CCC = 0.907). Agreement was unaffected by demographic variables or by presence/absence of ocular pathology. Test-retest agreement indices for both devices were excellent: in the range 0.88–0.96 for CDVA and in the range 0.90–0.98 for CS. Conclusion. MiQ measurements exhibit strong agreement with corresponding Thomson measurements, and test-retest results are good for both devices. Agreement between the two devices is unaffected by age or ocular pathology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4280651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42806512015-01-11 Measuring Visual Function Using the MultiQuity System: Comparison with an Established Device Smolarek-Kasprzak, Patrycja Nolan, John M. Beatty, Stephen Dennison, Jessica Akuffo, Kwadwo Owusu Kuchling, Robert Stack, Jim O'Regan, Graham J Ophthalmol Research Article Purpose. To compare measures of visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) from the Thompson Xpert 2000 and MultiQuity (MiQ) devices. Methods. Corrected distance VA (CDVA) and CS were measured in the right eye of 73 subjects, on an established system (Thompson Xpert) and a novel system (MiQ 720). Regression was used to convert MiQ scores into the Thompson scale. Agreement between the converted MiQ and Thompson scores was investigated using standard agreement indices. Test-retest variability for both devices was also investigated, for a separate sample of 24 subjects. Results. For CDVA, agreement was strong between the MiQ and Thomson devices (accuracy = 0.993, precision = 0.889, CCC = 0.883). For CS, agreement was also strong (accuracy = 0.996, precision = 0.911, CCC = 0.907). Agreement was unaffected by demographic variables or by presence/absence of ocular pathology. Test-retest agreement indices for both devices were excellent: in the range 0.88–0.96 for CDVA and in the range 0.90–0.98 for CS. Conclusion. MiQ measurements exhibit strong agreement with corresponding Thomson measurements, and test-retest results are good for both devices. Agreement between the two devices is unaffected by age or ocular pathology. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4280651/ /pubmed/25580278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/180317 Text en Copyright © 2014 Patrycja Smolarek-Kasprzak et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Smolarek-Kasprzak, Patrycja Nolan, John M. Beatty, Stephen Dennison, Jessica Akuffo, Kwadwo Owusu Kuchling, Robert Stack, Jim O'Regan, Graham Measuring Visual Function Using the MultiQuity System: Comparison with an Established Device |
title | Measuring Visual Function Using the MultiQuity System: Comparison with an Established Device |
title_full | Measuring Visual Function Using the MultiQuity System: Comparison with an Established Device |
title_fullStr | Measuring Visual Function Using the MultiQuity System: Comparison with an Established Device |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Visual Function Using the MultiQuity System: Comparison with an Established Device |
title_short | Measuring Visual Function Using the MultiQuity System: Comparison with an Established Device |
title_sort | measuring visual function using the multiquity system: comparison with an established device |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4280651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25580278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/180317 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smolarekkasprzakpatrycja measuringvisualfunctionusingthemultiquitysystemcomparisonwithanestablisheddevice AT nolanjohnm measuringvisualfunctionusingthemultiquitysystemcomparisonwithanestablisheddevice AT beattystephen measuringvisualfunctionusingthemultiquitysystemcomparisonwithanestablisheddevice AT dennisonjessica measuringvisualfunctionusingthemultiquitysystemcomparisonwithanestablisheddevice AT akuffokwadwoowusu measuringvisualfunctionusingthemultiquitysystemcomparisonwithanestablisheddevice AT kuchlingrobert measuringvisualfunctionusingthemultiquitysystemcomparisonwithanestablisheddevice AT stackjim measuringvisualfunctionusingthemultiquitysystemcomparisonwithanestablisheddevice AT oregangraham measuringvisualfunctionusingthemultiquitysystemcomparisonwithanestablisheddevice |