Cargando…

Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessments of adherence and exercise performance are required in order to ensure that patients adhere to and perform their rehabilitation exercises correctly within the home environment. Inertial sensors have previously been advocated as a means of achieving these requirements,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giggins, Oonagh M, Sweeney, Kevin T, Caulfield, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4280766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25431092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-158
_version_ 1782350897164058624
author Giggins, Oonagh M
Sweeney, Kevin T
Caulfield, Brian
author_facet Giggins, Oonagh M
Sweeney, Kevin T
Caulfield, Brian
author_sort Giggins, Oonagh M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate assessments of adherence and exercise performance are required in order to ensure that patients adhere to and perform their rehabilitation exercises correctly within the home environment. Inertial sensors have previously been advocated as a means of achieving these requirements, by using them as an input to an exercise biofeedback system. This research sought to investigate whether inertial sensors, and in particular a single sensor, can accurately classify exercise performance in patients performing lower limb exercises for rehabilitation purposes. METHODS: Fifty-eight participants (19 male, 39 female, age: 53.9 ± 8.5 years, height: 1.69 ± 0.08 m, weight: 74.3 ± 13.0 kg) performed ten repetitions of seven lower limb exercises (hip abduction, hip flexion, hip extension, knee extension, heel slide, straight leg raise, and inner range quadriceps). Three inertial sensor units, secured to the thigh, shin and foot of the leg being exercised, were used to acquire data during each exercise. Machine learning classification methods were applied to quantify the acquired data. RESULTS: The classification methods achieved relatively high accuracy at distinguishing between correct and incorrect performance of an exercise using three, two, or one sensor while moderate efficacy scores were also achieved by the classifier when attempting to classify the particular error in exercise performance. Results also illustrated that a reduction in the number of inertial sensor units employed has little effect on the overall efficacy results. CONCLUSION: The results revealed that it is possible to classify lower limb exercise performance using inertial sensors with satisfactory levels of accuracy and reducing the number of sensors employed does not reduce the accuracy of the method. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-158) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4280766
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42807662015-01-01 Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study Giggins, Oonagh M Sweeney, Kevin T Caulfield, Brian J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Accurate assessments of adherence and exercise performance are required in order to ensure that patients adhere to and perform their rehabilitation exercises correctly within the home environment. Inertial sensors have previously been advocated as a means of achieving these requirements, by using them as an input to an exercise biofeedback system. This research sought to investigate whether inertial sensors, and in particular a single sensor, can accurately classify exercise performance in patients performing lower limb exercises for rehabilitation purposes. METHODS: Fifty-eight participants (19 male, 39 female, age: 53.9 ± 8.5 years, height: 1.69 ± 0.08 m, weight: 74.3 ± 13.0 kg) performed ten repetitions of seven lower limb exercises (hip abduction, hip flexion, hip extension, knee extension, heel slide, straight leg raise, and inner range quadriceps). Three inertial sensor units, secured to the thigh, shin and foot of the leg being exercised, were used to acquire data during each exercise. Machine learning classification methods were applied to quantify the acquired data. RESULTS: The classification methods achieved relatively high accuracy at distinguishing between correct and incorrect performance of an exercise using three, two, or one sensor while moderate efficacy scores were also achieved by the classifier when attempting to classify the particular error in exercise performance. Results also illustrated that a reduction in the number of inertial sensor units employed has little effect on the overall efficacy results. CONCLUSION: The results revealed that it is possible to classify lower limb exercise performance using inertial sensors with satisfactory levels of accuracy and reducing the number of sensors employed does not reduce the accuracy of the method. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-158) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4280766/ /pubmed/25431092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-158 Text en © Giggins et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Giggins, Oonagh M
Sweeney, Kevin T
Caulfield, Brian
Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study
title Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study
title_full Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study
title_fullStr Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study
title_full_unstemmed Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study
title_short Rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study
title_sort rehabilitation exercise assessment using inertial sensors: a cross-sectional analytical study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4280766/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25431092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-158
work_keys_str_mv AT gigginsoonaghm rehabilitationexerciseassessmentusinginertialsensorsacrosssectionalanalyticalstudy
AT sweeneykevint rehabilitationexerciseassessmentusinginertialsensorsacrosssectionalanalyticalstudy
AT caulfieldbrian rehabilitationexerciseassessmentusinginertialsensorsacrosssectionalanalyticalstudy