Cargando…
Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias?
Recognizing patterns of parasite distribution among wildlife hosts is of major importance due to growing risk of transmission of zoonotic diseases to humans. Thus, sex-dependent parasite distribution in higher vertebrates is extensively studied, and males are often found more parasitized than female...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4281372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25410932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4231-z |
_version_ | 1782350984933015552 |
---|---|
author | Kowalski, Krzysztof Bogdziewicz, Michał Eichert, Urszula Rychlik, Leszek |
author_facet | Kowalski, Krzysztof Bogdziewicz, Michał Eichert, Urszula Rychlik, Leszek |
author_sort | Kowalski, Krzysztof |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recognizing patterns of parasite distribution among wildlife hosts is of major importance due to growing risk of transmission of zoonotic diseases to humans. Thus, sex-dependent parasite distribution in higher vertebrates is extensively studied, and males are often found more parasitized than females. Male-biased parasitism may be the result of weaker immunocompetence of male hosts owing to the immunosuppressive effect of androgens. Moreover, larger hosts (males) may demonstrate higher parasite infestation levels than smaller individuals (females), as they constitute a better nutritional resource for parasites and provide them with a greater variety of niches. In the present work, we investigated sex-dependent patterns of flea distribution among three common rodent species (Apodemus agrarius, Apodemus flavicollis, and Myodes glareolus). We hypothesized that males have a higher flea infestation than females. We confirm male-biased parasitism in A. agrarius and M. glareolus, but not in A. flavicollis. Additionally, flea infestation increased with body mass in A. agrarius, but not in A. flavicollis and M. glareolus. The detected differences in parasite distribution among sexes are probably the result of immunosuppressive effects of androgens and spatial behavior of males. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4281372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42813722015-01-05 Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias? Kowalski, Krzysztof Bogdziewicz, Michał Eichert, Urszula Rychlik, Leszek Parasitol Res Short Communication Recognizing patterns of parasite distribution among wildlife hosts is of major importance due to growing risk of transmission of zoonotic diseases to humans. Thus, sex-dependent parasite distribution in higher vertebrates is extensively studied, and males are often found more parasitized than females. Male-biased parasitism may be the result of weaker immunocompetence of male hosts owing to the immunosuppressive effect of androgens. Moreover, larger hosts (males) may demonstrate higher parasite infestation levels than smaller individuals (females), as they constitute a better nutritional resource for parasites and provide them with a greater variety of niches. In the present work, we investigated sex-dependent patterns of flea distribution among three common rodent species (Apodemus agrarius, Apodemus flavicollis, and Myodes glareolus). We hypothesized that males have a higher flea infestation than females. We confirm male-biased parasitism in A. agrarius and M. glareolus, but not in A. flavicollis. Additionally, flea infestation increased with body mass in A. agrarius, but not in A. flavicollis and M. glareolus. The detected differences in parasite distribution among sexes are probably the result of immunosuppressive effects of androgens and spatial behavior of males. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-11-21 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4281372/ /pubmed/25410932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4231-z Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Kowalski, Krzysztof Bogdziewicz, Michał Eichert, Urszula Rychlik, Leszek Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias? |
title | Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias? |
title_full | Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias? |
title_fullStr | Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias? |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias? |
title_short | Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias? |
title_sort | sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias? |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4281372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25410932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4231-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kowalskikrzysztof sexdifferencesinfleainfectionsamongrodenthostsisthereamalebias AT bogdziewiczmichał sexdifferencesinfleainfectionsamongrodenthostsisthereamalebias AT eicherturszula sexdifferencesinfleainfectionsamongrodenthostsisthereamalebias AT rychlikleszek sexdifferencesinfleainfectionsamongrodenthostsisthereamalebias |