Cargando…

Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias?

Recognizing patterns of parasite distribution among wildlife hosts is of major importance due to growing risk of transmission of zoonotic diseases to humans. Thus, sex-dependent parasite distribution in higher vertebrates is extensively studied, and males are often found more parasitized than female...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kowalski, Krzysztof, Bogdziewicz, Michał, Eichert, Urszula, Rychlik, Leszek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4281372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25410932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4231-z
_version_ 1782350984933015552
author Kowalski, Krzysztof
Bogdziewicz, Michał
Eichert, Urszula
Rychlik, Leszek
author_facet Kowalski, Krzysztof
Bogdziewicz, Michał
Eichert, Urszula
Rychlik, Leszek
author_sort Kowalski, Krzysztof
collection PubMed
description Recognizing patterns of parasite distribution among wildlife hosts is of major importance due to growing risk of transmission of zoonotic diseases to humans. Thus, sex-dependent parasite distribution in higher vertebrates is extensively studied, and males are often found more parasitized than females. Male-biased parasitism may be the result of weaker immunocompetence of male hosts owing to the immunosuppressive effect of androgens. Moreover, larger hosts (males) may demonstrate higher parasite infestation levels than smaller individuals (females), as they constitute a better nutritional resource for parasites and provide them with a greater variety of niches. In the present work, we investigated sex-dependent patterns of flea distribution among three common rodent species (Apodemus agrarius, Apodemus flavicollis, and Myodes glareolus). We hypothesized that males have a higher flea infestation than females. We confirm male-biased parasitism in A. agrarius and M. glareolus, but not in A. flavicollis. Additionally, flea infestation increased with body mass in A. agrarius, but not in A. flavicollis and M. glareolus. The detected differences in parasite distribution among sexes are probably the result of immunosuppressive effects of androgens and spatial behavior of males.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4281372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42813722015-01-05 Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias? Kowalski, Krzysztof Bogdziewicz, Michał Eichert, Urszula Rychlik, Leszek Parasitol Res Short Communication Recognizing patterns of parasite distribution among wildlife hosts is of major importance due to growing risk of transmission of zoonotic diseases to humans. Thus, sex-dependent parasite distribution in higher vertebrates is extensively studied, and males are often found more parasitized than females. Male-biased parasitism may be the result of weaker immunocompetence of male hosts owing to the immunosuppressive effect of androgens. Moreover, larger hosts (males) may demonstrate higher parasite infestation levels than smaller individuals (females), as they constitute a better nutritional resource for parasites and provide them with a greater variety of niches. In the present work, we investigated sex-dependent patterns of flea distribution among three common rodent species (Apodemus agrarius, Apodemus flavicollis, and Myodes glareolus). We hypothesized that males have a higher flea infestation than females. We confirm male-biased parasitism in A. agrarius and M. glareolus, but not in A. flavicollis. Additionally, flea infestation increased with body mass in A. agrarius, but not in A. flavicollis and M. glareolus. The detected differences in parasite distribution among sexes are probably the result of immunosuppressive effects of androgens and spatial behavior of males. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2014-11-21 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4281372/ /pubmed/25410932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4231-z Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Kowalski, Krzysztof
Bogdziewicz, Michał
Eichert, Urszula
Rychlik, Leszek
Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias?
title Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias?
title_full Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias?
title_fullStr Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias?
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias?
title_short Sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias?
title_sort sex differences in flea infections among rodent hosts: is there a male bias?
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4281372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25410932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4231-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kowalskikrzysztof sexdifferencesinfleainfectionsamongrodenthostsisthereamalebias
AT bogdziewiczmichał sexdifferencesinfleainfectionsamongrodenthostsisthereamalebias
AT eicherturszula sexdifferencesinfleainfectionsamongrodenthostsisthereamalebias
AT rychlikleszek sexdifferencesinfleainfectionsamongrodenthostsisthereamalebias