Cargando…

Risk Factors for Wound Dehiscence after Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Surgery

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate risks for wound dehiscence after guided bone regeneration (GBR) in dental implant surgery. METHODS: Patients who received dental implant therapy with GBR procedure at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (Seongnam, Korea) from June 2004 to May...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Young-Kyun, Yun, Pil-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4281900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27489821
http://dx.doi.org/10.14402/jkamprs.2014.36.3.116
_version_ 1782351045350916096
author Kim, Young-Kyun
Yun, Pil-Young
author_facet Kim, Young-Kyun
Yun, Pil-Young
author_sort Kim, Young-Kyun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate risks for wound dehiscence after guided bone regeneration (GBR) in dental implant surgery. METHODS: Patients who received dental implant therapy with GBR procedure at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (Seongnam, Korea) from June 2004 to May 2007 were included. The clinical outcome of interest was complications related to dental implant surgery. The factors influencing wound dehiscence, classified into patient-related factors, surgery-related factors and material-related factors, were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen cases (202 implants) were included in this study. Wound dehiscence (19.1%) was considered a major complication. The risk of wound dehiscence was higher in males than in females (odds ratio=4.279, P =0.014). In the main graft, the allogenic group had the lowest risk of wound dehiscence (odds ratio=0.106, P =0.006). Though the external connection group had a higher risk of wound dehiscence than the internal connection group (odds ratio=2.381), the difference was not significant (P =0.100). CONCLUSION: In this study, male gender and main graft have the highest risk of wound dehiscence. To reduce wound dehiscence after GBR, instructions on postoperative care with supplementary procedure for the protection of the wound dehiscence is recommended, especially to male patients. A main graft with a gel base can reduce the risk of wound dehiscence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4281900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42819002016-08-03 Risk Factors for Wound Dehiscence after Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Surgery Kim, Young-Kyun Yun, Pil-Young Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate risks for wound dehiscence after guided bone regeneration (GBR) in dental implant surgery. METHODS: Patients who received dental implant therapy with GBR procedure at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (Seongnam, Korea) from June 2004 to May 2007 were included. The clinical outcome of interest was complications related to dental implant surgery. The factors influencing wound dehiscence, classified into patient-related factors, surgery-related factors and material-related factors, were evaluated. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen cases (202 implants) were included in this study. Wound dehiscence (19.1%) was considered a major complication. The risk of wound dehiscence was higher in males than in females (odds ratio=4.279, P =0.014). In the main graft, the allogenic group had the lowest risk of wound dehiscence (odds ratio=0.106, P =0.006). Though the external connection group had a higher risk of wound dehiscence than the internal connection group (odds ratio=2.381), the difference was not significant (P =0.100). CONCLUSION: In this study, male gender and main graft have the highest risk of wound dehiscence. To reduce wound dehiscence after GBR, instructions on postoperative care with supplementary procedure for the protection of the wound dehiscence is recommended, especially to male patients. A main graft with a gel base can reduce the risk of wound dehiscence. The Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2014-05-30 2014-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4281900/ /pubmed/27489821 http://dx.doi.org/10.14402/jkamprs.2014.36.3.116 Text en Copyright © 2014 by The Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Young-Kyun
Yun, Pil-Young
Risk Factors for Wound Dehiscence after Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Surgery
title Risk Factors for Wound Dehiscence after Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Surgery
title_full Risk Factors for Wound Dehiscence after Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Surgery
title_fullStr Risk Factors for Wound Dehiscence after Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Risk Factors for Wound Dehiscence after Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Surgery
title_short Risk Factors for Wound Dehiscence after Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Surgery
title_sort risk factors for wound dehiscence after guided bone regeneration in dental implant surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4281900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27489821
http://dx.doi.org/10.14402/jkamprs.2014.36.3.116
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyoungkyun riskfactorsforwounddehiscenceafterguidedboneregenerationindentalimplantsurgery
AT yunpilyoung riskfactorsforwounddehiscenceafterguidedboneregenerationindentalimplantsurgery