Cargando…
Selection for reluctance to avoid humans during the domestication of mice
Many animal species have been domesticated over the course of human history and became tame as a result of domestication. Tameness is a behavioral characteristic with 2 potential components: (1) reluctance to avoid humans and (2) motivation to approach humans. However, the specific behavioral charac...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24034605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12088 |
_version_ | 1782351075529981952 |
---|---|
author | Goto, T Tanave, A Moriwaki, K Shiroishi, T Koide, T |
author_facet | Goto, T Tanave, A Moriwaki, K Shiroishi, T Koide, T |
author_sort | Goto, T |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many animal species have been domesticated over the course of human history and became tame as a result of domestication. Tameness is a behavioral characteristic with 2 potential components: (1) reluctance to avoid humans and (2) motivation to approach humans. However, the specific behavioral characteristics selected during domestication processes remain to be clarified for many species. To quantify these 2 different components of tameness separately, we established 3 behavioral tests: the ‘active tame’, ‘passive tame’ and ‘stay-on-hand’ tests. We subjected genetically diverse mouse strains to these tests, including 10 wild strains (BFM/2Ms, PGN2/Ms, HMI/Ms, BLG2/Ms, NJL/Ms, KJR/Ms, SWN/Ms, CHD/Ms, MSM/Ms and CAST/Ei), a fancy strain (JF1/Ms) and 6 standard laboratory strains (C3H/HeNJcl, CBA/J, BALB/cAnNCrlCrlj, DBA/2JJcl, 129(+Ter)/SvJcl and C57BL/6JJcl). To analyze the effects of domestication, these 17 strains were divided into 2 groups: domesticated strains (fancy and laboratory strains) and wild strains. Significant differences between strains were observed in all traits, and the calculated estimates of broad-sense heritability were 0.15–0.72. These results illustrate that tameness in mice is significantly influenced by genetic background. In addition, they clearly show the differences in the features of tameness in domesticated and wild strains. Most of the domesticated strains showed significantly greater reluctance to avoid humans than wild strains, whereas there was no significant difference in the level of motivation to approach humans between these 2 groups. These results might help to clarify the genetic basis of tameness in mice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4282115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42821152015-01-15 Selection for reluctance to avoid humans during the domestication of mice Goto, T Tanave, A Moriwaki, K Shiroishi, T Koide, T Genes Brain Behav Original Articles Many animal species have been domesticated over the course of human history and became tame as a result of domestication. Tameness is a behavioral characteristic with 2 potential components: (1) reluctance to avoid humans and (2) motivation to approach humans. However, the specific behavioral characteristics selected during domestication processes remain to be clarified for many species. To quantify these 2 different components of tameness separately, we established 3 behavioral tests: the ‘active tame’, ‘passive tame’ and ‘stay-on-hand’ tests. We subjected genetically diverse mouse strains to these tests, including 10 wild strains (BFM/2Ms, PGN2/Ms, HMI/Ms, BLG2/Ms, NJL/Ms, KJR/Ms, SWN/Ms, CHD/Ms, MSM/Ms and CAST/Ei), a fancy strain (JF1/Ms) and 6 standard laboratory strains (C3H/HeNJcl, CBA/J, BALB/cAnNCrlCrlj, DBA/2JJcl, 129(+Ter)/SvJcl and C57BL/6JJcl). To analyze the effects of domestication, these 17 strains were divided into 2 groups: domesticated strains (fancy and laboratory strains) and wild strains. Significant differences between strains were observed in all traits, and the calculated estimates of broad-sense heritability were 0.15–0.72. These results illustrate that tameness in mice is significantly influenced by genetic background. In addition, they clearly show the differences in the features of tameness in domesticated and wild strains. Most of the domesticated strains showed significantly greater reluctance to avoid humans than wild strains, whereas there was no significant difference in the level of motivation to approach humans between these 2 groups. These results might help to clarify the genetic basis of tameness in mice. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-11 2013-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4282115/ /pubmed/24034605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12088 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Genes, Brain and Behavior published by International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Goto, T Tanave, A Moriwaki, K Shiroishi, T Koide, T Selection for reluctance to avoid humans during the domestication of mice |
title | Selection for reluctance to avoid humans during the domestication of mice |
title_full | Selection for reluctance to avoid humans during the domestication of mice |
title_fullStr | Selection for reluctance to avoid humans during the domestication of mice |
title_full_unstemmed | Selection for reluctance to avoid humans during the domestication of mice |
title_short | Selection for reluctance to avoid humans during the domestication of mice |
title_sort | selection for reluctance to avoid humans during the domestication of mice |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24034605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12088 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gotot selectionforreluctancetoavoidhumansduringthedomesticationofmice AT tanavea selectionforreluctancetoavoidhumansduringthedomesticationofmice AT moriwakik selectionforreluctancetoavoidhumansduringthedomesticationofmice AT shiroishit selectionforreluctancetoavoidhumansduringthedomesticationofmice AT koidet selectionforreluctancetoavoidhumansduringthedomesticationofmice |