Cargando…

Do assortative preferences contribute to assortative mating for adiposity?

Assortative mating for adiposity, whereby levels of adiposity in romantic partners tend to be positively correlated, has implications for population health due to the combined effects of partners' levels of adiposity on fertility and/or offspring health. Although assortative preferences for cue...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fisher, Claire I, Fincher, Corey L, Hahn, Amanda C, Little, Anthony C, DeBruine, Lisa M, Jones, Benedict C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24168811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12055
_version_ 1782351077653348352
author Fisher, Claire I
Fincher, Corey L
Hahn, Amanda C
Little, Anthony C
DeBruine, Lisa M
Jones, Benedict C
author_facet Fisher, Claire I
Fincher, Corey L
Hahn, Amanda C
Little, Anthony C
DeBruine, Lisa M
Jones, Benedict C
author_sort Fisher, Claire I
collection PubMed
description Assortative mating for adiposity, whereby levels of adiposity in romantic partners tend to be positively correlated, has implications for population health due to the combined effects of partners' levels of adiposity on fertility and/or offspring health. Although assortative preferences for cues of adiposity, whereby leaner people are inherently more attracted to leaner individuals, have been proposed as a factor in assortative mating for adiposity, there have been no direct tests of this issue. Because of this, and because of recent work suggesting that facial cues of adiposity convey information about others' health that may be particularly important for mate preferences, we tested the contribution of assortative preferences for facial cues of adiposity to assortative mating for adiposity (assessed from body mass index, BMI) in a sample of romantic couples. Romantic partners' BMIs were positively correlated and this correlation was not due to the effects of age or relationship duration. However, although men and women with leaner partners showed stronger preferences for cues of low levels of adiposity, controlling for these preferences did not weaken the correlation between partners' BMIs. Indeed, own BMI and preferences were uncorrelated. These results suggest that assortative preferences for facial cues of adiposity contribute little (if at all) to assortative mating for adiposity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4282125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42821252015-01-15 Do assortative preferences contribute to assortative mating for adiposity? Fisher, Claire I Fincher, Corey L Hahn, Amanda C Little, Anthony C DeBruine, Lisa M Jones, Benedict C Br J Psychol Original Articles Assortative mating for adiposity, whereby levels of adiposity in romantic partners tend to be positively correlated, has implications for population health due to the combined effects of partners' levels of adiposity on fertility and/or offspring health. Although assortative preferences for cues of adiposity, whereby leaner people are inherently more attracted to leaner individuals, have been proposed as a factor in assortative mating for adiposity, there have been no direct tests of this issue. Because of this, and because of recent work suggesting that facial cues of adiposity convey information about others' health that may be particularly important for mate preferences, we tested the contribution of assortative preferences for facial cues of adiposity to assortative mating for adiposity (assessed from body mass index, BMI) in a sample of romantic couples. Romantic partners' BMIs were positively correlated and this correlation was not due to the effects of age or relationship duration. However, although men and women with leaner partners showed stronger preferences for cues of low levels of adiposity, controlling for these preferences did not weaken the correlation between partners' BMIs. Indeed, own BMI and preferences were uncorrelated. These results suggest that assortative preferences for facial cues of adiposity contribute little (if at all) to assortative mating for adiposity. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-11 2013-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4282125/ /pubmed/24168811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12055 Text en © 2013 The Authors. British Journal of Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the British Psychological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Fisher, Claire I
Fincher, Corey L
Hahn, Amanda C
Little, Anthony C
DeBruine, Lisa M
Jones, Benedict C
Do assortative preferences contribute to assortative mating for adiposity?
title Do assortative preferences contribute to assortative mating for adiposity?
title_full Do assortative preferences contribute to assortative mating for adiposity?
title_fullStr Do assortative preferences contribute to assortative mating for adiposity?
title_full_unstemmed Do assortative preferences contribute to assortative mating for adiposity?
title_short Do assortative preferences contribute to assortative mating for adiposity?
title_sort do assortative preferences contribute to assortative mating for adiposity?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24168811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12055
work_keys_str_mv AT fisherclairei doassortativepreferencescontributetoassortativematingforadiposity
AT finchercoreyl doassortativepreferencescontributetoassortativematingforadiposity
AT hahnamandac doassortativepreferencescontributetoassortativematingforadiposity
AT littleanthonyc doassortativepreferencescontributetoassortativematingforadiposity
AT debruinelisam doassortativepreferencescontributetoassortativematingforadiposity
AT jonesbenedictc doassortativepreferencescontributetoassortativematingforadiposity