Cargando…

The feasibility and benefits of using volumetric arc therapy in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy management of patients with brain metastases most commonly involve a whole‐brain radiation therapy (WBRT) regime, as well as newer techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The long treatment times incurred by these tec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andrevska, Adriana, Knight, Kellie A., Sale, Charlotte A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25598981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.69
_version_ 1782351078198607872
author Andrevska, Adriana
Knight, Kellie A.
Sale, Charlotte A.
author_facet Andrevska, Adriana
Knight, Kellie A.
Sale, Charlotte A.
author_sort Andrevska, Adriana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy management of patients with brain metastases most commonly involve a whole‐brain radiation therapy (WBRT) regime, as well as newer techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The long treatment times incurred by these techniques indicates the need for a novel technique that has shorter treatment times, whilst still producing highly conformal treatment with the potential to deliver escalated doses to the target area. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a dynamic, highly conformal technique that may deliver high doses of radiation through a single gantry arc and reduce overall treatment times. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the feasibility and benefits of VMAT treatment in regard to overall survival rates and local control in patients with brain metastases, in comparison with patients treated with WBRT, SRS and IMRT. METHODS: A search of the literature identified 23 articles for the purpose of this review. Articles were included on the basis they were human‐based studies, with sample sizes of more than five patients who were receiving treatment for 1–10 metastatic brain lesions. RESULTS: VMAT was found to be highly conformal, have a reduced treatment delivery time and incurred no significant toxicities in comparison with WBRT, SRS and IMRT. CONCLUSION: Compared to other treatment techniques, VMAT proved to have fewer toxicities than conventional WBRT, shorter treatment times than SRS and similar dose distributions to IMRT plans. Future prospective studies are needed to accurately assess the prognostic benefits of VMAT as well as the occurrence of late toxicities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4282127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42821272015-01-15 The feasibility and benefits of using volumetric arc therapy in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review Andrevska, Adriana Knight, Kellie A. Sale, Charlotte A. J Med Radiat Sci Review Article INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy management of patients with brain metastases most commonly involve a whole‐brain radiation therapy (WBRT) regime, as well as newer techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The long treatment times incurred by these techniques indicates the need for a novel technique that has shorter treatment times, whilst still producing highly conformal treatment with the potential to deliver escalated doses to the target area. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a dynamic, highly conformal technique that may deliver high doses of radiation through a single gantry arc and reduce overall treatment times. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the feasibility and benefits of VMAT treatment in regard to overall survival rates and local control in patients with brain metastases, in comparison with patients treated with WBRT, SRS and IMRT. METHODS: A search of the literature identified 23 articles for the purpose of this review. Articles were included on the basis they were human‐based studies, with sample sizes of more than five patients who were receiving treatment for 1–10 metastatic brain lesions. RESULTS: VMAT was found to be highly conformal, have a reduced treatment delivery time and incurred no significant toxicities in comparison with WBRT, SRS and IMRT. CONCLUSION: Compared to other treatment techniques, VMAT proved to have fewer toxicities than conventional WBRT, shorter treatment times than SRS and similar dose distributions to IMRT plans. Future prospective studies are needed to accurately assess the prognostic benefits of VMAT as well as the occurrence of late toxicities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2014-12 2014-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4282127/ /pubmed/25598981 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.69 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Australian Institute of Radiography and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Review Article
Andrevska, Adriana
Knight, Kellie A.
Sale, Charlotte A.
The feasibility and benefits of using volumetric arc therapy in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review
title The feasibility and benefits of using volumetric arc therapy in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review
title_full The feasibility and benefits of using volumetric arc therapy in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review
title_fullStr The feasibility and benefits of using volumetric arc therapy in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The feasibility and benefits of using volumetric arc therapy in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review
title_short The feasibility and benefits of using volumetric arc therapy in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review
title_sort feasibility and benefits of using volumetric arc therapy in patients with brain metastases: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25598981
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.69
work_keys_str_mv AT andrevskaadriana thefeasibilityandbenefitsofusingvolumetricarctherapyinpatientswithbrainmetastasesasystematicreview
AT knightkelliea thefeasibilityandbenefitsofusingvolumetricarctherapyinpatientswithbrainmetastasesasystematicreview
AT salecharlottea thefeasibilityandbenefitsofusingvolumetricarctherapyinpatientswithbrainmetastasesasystematicreview
AT andrevskaadriana feasibilityandbenefitsofusingvolumetricarctherapyinpatientswithbrainmetastasesasystematicreview
AT knightkelliea feasibilityandbenefitsofusingvolumetricarctherapyinpatientswithbrainmetastasesasystematicreview
AT salecharlottea feasibilityandbenefitsofusingvolumetricarctherapyinpatientswithbrainmetastasesasystematicreview