Cargando…

Therapeutic management of anal eczema: an evidence-based review

AIM: To conduct a systematic review of treatments for anal eczema (AE). METHODS: We conducted a Medline search for clinical trial data for the treatment of perianal diseases including AE, including papers not published in the English language. We assessed the study reports using the system recommend...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Havlickova, B, Weyandt, G H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24898365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12457
_version_ 1782351104069074944
author Havlickova, B
Weyandt, G H
author_facet Havlickova, B
Weyandt, G H
author_sort Havlickova, B
collection PubMed
description AIM: To conduct a systematic review of treatments for anal eczema (AE). METHODS: We conducted a Medline search for clinical trial data for the treatment of perianal diseases including AE, including papers not published in the English language. We assessed the study reports using the system recommended by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. No meta-analysis was attempted. RESULTS: The evidence base for topical treatments used to treat AE is very poor: there are very few studies and many of those that exist are of poor quality. The best evidence was found for medications that are yet to be licensed for AE. Among products with existing licences for the treatment of eczema, our assessment found some evidence to support the continued use of mild-to-moderate corticosteroids first line in most patients. DISCUSSION: Features of the perianal region, and the fact that it is almost always occluded, mean that not all medications recommended in the general treatment guidelines for eczema are appropriate for AE. However, there are no specific treatment guidelines for these patients. This may in part be because of the lack of high-quality evidence-based medicine in this therapy area. Many frequently prescribed medications were developed and licensed many years ago, in an era when clinical trial design was not expected to be as rigorous as it is today. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the need to conduct more high-quality clinical trials in patients with AE in order that specific guidelines for the management of this difficult proctological condition can be prepared.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4282279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42822792015-01-15 Therapeutic management of anal eczema: an evidence-based review Havlickova, B Weyandt, G H Int J Clin Pract Dermatology AIM: To conduct a systematic review of treatments for anal eczema (AE). METHODS: We conducted a Medline search for clinical trial data for the treatment of perianal diseases including AE, including papers not published in the English language. We assessed the study reports using the system recommended by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine. No meta-analysis was attempted. RESULTS: The evidence base for topical treatments used to treat AE is very poor: there are very few studies and many of those that exist are of poor quality. The best evidence was found for medications that are yet to be licensed for AE. Among products with existing licences for the treatment of eczema, our assessment found some evidence to support the continued use of mild-to-moderate corticosteroids first line in most patients. DISCUSSION: Features of the perianal region, and the fact that it is almost always occluded, mean that not all medications recommended in the general treatment guidelines for eczema are appropriate for AE. However, there are no specific treatment guidelines for these patients. This may in part be because of the lack of high-quality evidence-based medicine in this therapy area. Many frequently prescribed medications were developed and licensed many years ago, in an era when clinical trial design was not expected to be as rigorous as it is today. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the need to conduct more high-quality clinical trials in patients with AE in order that specific guidelines for the management of this difficult proctological condition can be prepared. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-11 2014-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4282279/ /pubmed/24898365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12457 Text en © 2014 The Authors. International Journal of Clinical Practice Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Dermatology
Havlickova, B
Weyandt, G H
Therapeutic management of anal eczema: an evidence-based review
title Therapeutic management of anal eczema: an evidence-based review
title_full Therapeutic management of anal eczema: an evidence-based review
title_fullStr Therapeutic management of anal eczema: an evidence-based review
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic management of anal eczema: an evidence-based review
title_short Therapeutic management of anal eczema: an evidence-based review
title_sort therapeutic management of anal eczema: an evidence-based review
topic Dermatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24898365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12457
work_keys_str_mv AT havlickovab therapeuticmanagementofanaleczemaanevidencebasedreview
AT weyandtgh therapeuticmanagementofanaleczemaanevidencebasedreview