Cargando…

FISH analysis of PTEN in endometrial carcinoma. comparison with SNP arrays and MLPA

AIMS: To check the usefulness of a standardized protocol of PTEN FISH in 31 endometrial carcinomas (ECs) in comparison with SNP array (SNPA), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and immunohistochemistry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis showed two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maiques, Oscar, Cuevas, Dolors, García Dios, Diego Andrés, Coenegrachts, Lieve, Santacana, Maria, Velasco, Ana, Romero, Marta, Gatius, Sónia, Lambrechts, Diether, Müller, Sven, Pedersen, Hans Christian, Dolcet, Xavier, Amant, Frederic, Matias-Guiu, Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25353038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.12396
_version_ 1782351126744530944
author Maiques, Oscar
Cuevas, Dolors
García Dios, Diego Andrés
Coenegrachts, Lieve
Santacana, Maria
Velasco, Ana
Romero, Marta
Gatius, Sónia
Lambrechts, Diether
Müller, Sven
Pedersen, Hans Christian
Dolcet, Xavier
Amant, Frederic
Matias-Guiu, Xavier
author_facet Maiques, Oscar
Cuevas, Dolors
García Dios, Diego Andrés
Coenegrachts, Lieve
Santacana, Maria
Velasco, Ana
Romero, Marta
Gatius, Sónia
Lambrechts, Diether
Müller, Sven
Pedersen, Hans Christian
Dolcet, Xavier
Amant, Frederic
Matias-Guiu, Xavier
author_sort Maiques, Oscar
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To check the usefulness of a standardized protocol of PTEN FISH in 31 endometrial carcinomas (ECs) in comparison with SNP array (SNPA), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and immunohistochemistry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis showed two PTEN copies in 17 cases, three copies in nine cases, hemizygous deletion in two cases, and diverse cell populations with different PTEN copy number in three cases. A good correlation was seen between FISH and SNPA, particularly in cases with three copies. FISH identified two cases with entire deletion of chromosome 10, but did not identify a focal deletion of PTEN. Five cases with PTEN deletion and duplication of the second allele by SNPA were interpreted as normal by FISH. Concordance between FISH and MLPA was seen in 15 cases with two copies, and in two cases with PTEN deletion. Six cases were interpreted as amplified by MLPA, but showed polyploidy by FISH. FISH was superior to SNPA and MLPA in assessing the tumours with diverse cell populations with different PTEN copies. CONCLUSIONS: The results show good concordance between FISH, SNPA and MLPA. SNPA was superior in tumours with deletion of one copy and duplication of the second allele. FISH was superior in assessing tumour heterogeneity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4282383
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42823832015-01-15 FISH analysis of PTEN in endometrial carcinoma. comparison with SNP arrays and MLPA Maiques, Oscar Cuevas, Dolors García Dios, Diego Andrés Coenegrachts, Lieve Santacana, Maria Velasco, Ana Romero, Marta Gatius, Sónia Lambrechts, Diether Müller, Sven Pedersen, Hans Christian Dolcet, Xavier Amant, Frederic Matias-Guiu, Xavier Histopathology Original Articles AIMS: To check the usefulness of a standardized protocol of PTEN FISH in 31 endometrial carcinomas (ECs) in comparison with SNP array (SNPA), multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA), and immunohistochemistry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis showed two PTEN copies in 17 cases, three copies in nine cases, hemizygous deletion in two cases, and diverse cell populations with different PTEN copy number in three cases. A good correlation was seen between FISH and SNPA, particularly in cases with three copies. FISH identified two cases with entire deletion of chromosome 10, but did not identify a focal deletion of PTEN. Five cases with PTEN deletion and duplication of the second allele by SNPA were interpreted as normal by FISH. Concordance between FISH and MLPA was seen in 15 cases with two copies, and in two cases with PTEN deletion. Six cases were interpreted as amplified by MLPA, but showed polyploidy by FISH. FISH was superior to SNPA and MLPA in assessing the tumours with diverse cell populations with different PTEN copies. CONCLUSIONS: The results show good concordance between FISH, SNPA and MLPA. SNPA was superior in tumours with deletion of one copy and duplication of the second allele. FISH was superior in assessing tumour heterogeneity. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-09 2014-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4282383/ /pubmed/25353038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.12396 Text en © 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Maiques, Oscar
Cuevas, Dolors
García Dios, Diego Andrés
Coenegrachts, Lieve
Santacana, Maria
Velasco, Ana
Romero, Marta
Gatius, Sónia
Lambrechts, Diether
Müller, Sven
Pedersen, Hans Christian
Dolcet, Xavier
Amant, Frederic
Matias-Guiu, Xavier
FISH analysis of PTEN in endometrial carcinoma. comparison with SNP arrays and MLPA
title FISH analysis of PTEN in endometrial carcinoma. comparison with SNP arrays and MLPA
title_full FISH analysis of PTEN in endometrial carcinoma. comparison with SNP arrays and MLPA
title_fullStr FISH analysis of PTEN in endometrial carcinoma. comparison with SNP arrays and MLPA
title_full_unstemmed FISH analysis of PTEN in endometrial carcinoma. comparison with SNP arrays and MLPA
title_short FISH analysis of PTEN in endometrial carcinoma. comparison with SNP arrays and MLPA
title_sort fish analysis of pten in endometrial carcinoma. comparison with snp arrays and mlpa
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282383/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25353038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/his.12396
work_keys_str_mv AT maiquesoscar fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa
AT cuevasdolors fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa
AT garciadiosdiegoandres fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa
AT coenegrachtslieve fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa
AT santacanamaria fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa
AT velascoana fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa
AT romeromarta fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa
AT gatiussonia fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa
AT lambrechtsdiether fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa
AT mullersven fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa
AT pedersenhanschristian fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa
AT dolcetxavier fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa
AT amantfrederic fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa
AT matiasguiuxavier fishanalysisofpteninendometrialcarcinomacomparisonwithsnparraysandmlpa