Cargando…

Exploring the relationship between governance mechanisms in healthcare and health workforce outcomes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: The objective of this systematic review of diverse evidence was to examine the relationship between health system governance and workforce outcomes. Particular attention was paid to how governance mechanisms facilitate change in the workforce to ensure the effective use of all health pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hastings, Stephanie E, Armitage, Gail D, Mallinson, Sara, Jackson, Karen, Suter, Esther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25280467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-479
_version_ 1782351147439226880
author Hastings, Stephanie E
Armitage, Gail D
Mallinson, Sara
Jackson, Karen
Suter, Esther
author_facet Hastings, Stephanie E
Armitage, Gail D
Mallinson, Sara
Jackson, Karen
Suter, Esther
author_sort Hastings, Stephanie E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this systematic review of diverse evidence was to examine the relationship between health system governance and workforce outcomes. Particular attention was paid to how governance mechanisms facilitate change in the workforce to ensure the effective use of all health providers. METHODS: In accordance with standard systematic review procedures, the research team independently screened over 4300 abstracts found in database searches, website searches, and bibliographies. Searches were limited to 2001–2012, included only publications from Canada, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Australia, and the United States. Peer- reviewed papers and grey literature were considered. Two reviewers independently rated articles on quality and relevance and classified them into themes identified by the team. One hundred and thirteen articles that discussed both workforce and governance were retained and extracted into narrative summary tables for synthesis. RESULTS: Six types of governance mechanisms emerged from our analysis. Shared governance, Magnet accreditation, and professional development initiatives were all associated with improved outcomes for the health workforce (e.g., decreased turnover, increased job satisfaction, increased empowerment, etc.). Implementation of quality-focused initiatives was associated with apprehension among providers, but opportunities for provider training on these initiatives increased quality and improved work attitudes. Research on reorganization of healthcare delivery suggests that changing to team-based care is accompanied by stress and concerns about role clarity, that outcomes vary for providers in private versus public organizations, and that co-operative clinics are beneficial for physicians. Funding schemes required a supplementary search to achieve adequate depth and coverage. Those findings are reported elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the review show that while there are governance mechanisms that consider workforce impacts, it is not to the extent one might expect given the importance of the workforce for improving patient outcomes. Furthermore, to successfully implement governance mechanisms in this domain, there are key strategies recommended to support change and achieve desired outcomes. The most important of these are: to build trust by clearly articulating the organization’s goal; considering the workforce through planning, implementation, and evaluation phases; and providing strong leadership. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-479) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4282499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42824992015-01-03 Exploring the relationship between governance mechanisms in healthcare and health workforce outcomes: a systematic review Hastings, Stephanie E Armitage, Gail D Mallinson, Sara Jackson, Karen Suter, Esther BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this systematic review of diverse evidence was to examine the relationship between health system governance and workforce outcomes. Particular attention was paid to how governance mechanisms facilitate change in the workforce to ensure the effective use of all health providers. METHODS: In accordance with standard systematic review procedures, the research team independently screened over 4300 abstracts found in database searches, website searches, and bibliographies. Searches were limited to 2001–2012, included only publications from Canada, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Australia, and the United States. Peer- reviewed papers and grey literature were considered. Two reviewers independently rated articles on quality and relevance and classified them into themes identified by the team. One hundred and thirteen articles that discussed both workforce and governance were retained and extracted into narrative summary tables for synthesis. RESULTS: Six types of governance mechanisms emerged from our analysis. Shared governance, Magnet accreditation, and professional development initiatives were all associated with improved outcomes for the health workforce (e.g., decreased turnover, increased job satisfaction, increased empowerment, etc.). Implementation of quality-focused initiatives was associated with apprehension among providers, but opportunities for provider training on these initiatives increased quality and improved work attitudes. Research on reorganization of healthcare delivery suggests that changing to team-based care is accompanied by stress and concerns about role clarity, that outcomes vary for providers in private versus public organizations, and that co-operative clinics are beneficial for physicians. Funding schemes required a supplementary search to achieve adequate depth and coverage. Those findings are reported elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the review show that while there are governance mechanisms that consider workforce impacts, it is not to the extent one might expect given the importance of the workforce for improving patient outcomes. Furthermore, to successfully implement governance mechanisms in this domain, there are key strategies recommended to support change and achieve desired outcomes. The most important of these are: to build trust by clearly articulating the organization’s goal; considering the workforce through planning, implementation, and evaluation phases; and providing strong leadership. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-479) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4282499/ /pubmed/25280467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-479 Text en © Hastings et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hastings, Stephanie E
Armitage, Gail D
Mallinson, Sara
Jackson, Karen
Suter, Esther
Exploring the relationship between governance mechanisms in healthcare and health workforce outcomes: a systematic review
title Exploring the relationship between governance mechanisms in healthcare and health workforce outcomes: a systematic review
title_full Exploring the relationship between governance mechanisms in healthcare and health workforce outcomes: a systematic review
title_fullStr Exploring the relationship between governance mechanisms in healthcare and health workforce outcomes: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the relationship between governance mechanisms in healthcare and health workforce outcomes: a systematic review
title_short Exploring the relationship between governance mechanisms in healthcare and health workforce outcomes: a systematic review
title_sort exploring the relationship between governance mechanisms in healthcare and health workforce outcomes: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25280467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-479
work_keys_str_mv AT hastingsstephaniee exploringtherelationshipbetweengovernancemechanismsinhealthcareandhealthworkforceoutcomesasystematicreview
AT armitagegaild exploringtherelationshipbetweengovernancemechanismsinhealthcareandhealthworkforceoutcomesasystematicreview
AT mallinsonsara exploringtherelationshipbetweengovernancemechanismsinhealthcareandhealthworkforceoutcomesasystematicreview
AT jacksonkaren exploringtherelationshipbetweengovernancemechanismsinhealthcareandhealthworkforceoutcomesasystematicreview
AT suteresther exploringtherelationshipbetweengovernancemechanismsinhealthcareandhealthworkforceoutcomesasystematicreview