Cargando…

Is neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy beneficial in prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy?

PURPOSE: To determine whether neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 201 patients with prostate cancer treated with radioth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eom, Keun-Yong, Ha, Sung W, Lee, Eunsik, Kwak, Cheol, Lee, Sang Eun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25568853
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2014.32.4.247
_version_ 1782351205789335552
author Eom, Keun-Yong
Ha, Sung W
Lee, Eunsik
Kwak, Cheol
Lee, Sang Eun
author_facet Eom, Keun-Yong
Ha, Sung W
Lee, Eunsik
Kwak, Cheol
Lee, Sang Eun
author_sort Eom, Keun-Yong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine whether neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 201 patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy between January 1991 and December 2008. Of these, 156 patients with more than 3 years of follow-up were the subjects of this study. The median duration of follow-up was 91.2 months. NADT was given in 103 patients (66%) with median duration of 3.3 months (range, 1.0 to 7.7 months). Radiation dose was escalated gradually from 64 Gy to 81 Gy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique. RESULTS: Biochemical relapse-free survival (BCRFS) and overall survival (OS) of all patients were 72.6% and 90.7% at 5 years, respectively. BCRFS and OS of NADT group were 79.5% and 89.8% at 5 years and those of radiotherapy alone group were 58.8% and 92.3% at 5 years, respectively. Risk group (p = 0.010) and radiation dose ≥70 Gy (p = 0.017) affected BCRFS independently. NADT was a significant prognostic factor in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis (p = 0.073). Radiation dose ≥70 Gy was only an independent factor for OS (p = 0.007; hazard ratio, 0.261; 95% confidence interval, 0.071-0.963). CONCLUSION: NADT prior to definitive radiotherapy did not result in significant benefit in terms of BCRFS and OS. NADT should not be performed routinely in the era of dose-escalated radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4282999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42829992015-01-07 Is neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy beneficial in prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy? Eom, Keun-Yong Ha, Sung W Lee, Eunsik Kwak, Cheol Lee, Sang Eun Radiat Oncol J Original Article PURPOSE: To determine whether neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (NADT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 201 patients with prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy between January 1991 and December 2008. Of these, 156 patients with more than 3 years of follow-up were the subjects of this study. The median duration of follow-up was 91.2 months. NADT was given in 103 patients (66%) with median duration of 3.3 months (range, 1.0 to 7.7 months). Radiation dose was escalated gradually from 64 Gy to 81 Gy using intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique. RESULTS: Biochemical relapse-free survival (BCRFS) and overall survival (OS) of all patients were 72.6% and 90.7% at 5 years, respectively. BCRFS and OS of NADT group were 79.5% and 89.8% at 5 years and those of radiotherapy alone group were 58.8% and 92.3% at 5 years, respectively. Risk group (p = 0.010) and radiation dose ≥70 Gy (p = 0.017) affected BCRFS independently. NADT was a significant prognostic factor in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis (p = 0.073). Radiation dose ≥70 Gy was only an independent factor for OS (p = 0.007; hazard ratio, 0.261; 95% confidence interval, 0.071-0.963). CONCLUSION: NADT prior to definitive radiotherapy did not result in significant benefit in terms of BCRFS and OS. NADT should not be performed routinely in the era of dose-escalated radiotherapy. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology 2014-12 2014-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4282999/ /pubmed/25568853 http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2014.32.4.247 Text en Copyright © 2014. The Korean Society for Radiation Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Eom, Keun-Yong
Ha, Sung W
Lee, Eunsik
Kwak, Cheol
Lee, Sang Eun
Is neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy beneficial in prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy?
title Is neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy beneficial in prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy?
title_full Is neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy beneficial in prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy?
title_fullStr Is neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy beneficial in prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy?
title_full_unstemmed Is neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy beneficial in prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy?
title_short Is neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy beneficial in prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy?
title_sort is neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy beneficial in prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25568853
http://dx.doi.org/10.3857/roj.2014.32.4.247
work_keys_str_mv AT eomkeunyong isneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapybeneficialinprostatecancertreatedwithdefinitiveradiotherapy
AT hasungw isneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapybeneficialinprostatecancertreatedwithdefinitiveradiotherapy
AT leeeunsik isneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapybeneficialinprostatecancertreatedwithdefinitiveradiotherapy
AT kwakcheol isneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapybeneficialinprostatecancertreatedwithdefinitiveradiotherapy
AT leesangeun isneoadjuvantandrogendeprivationtherapybeneficialinprostatecancertreatedwithdefinitiveradiotherapy