Cargando…

Quality of diabetes care worldwide and feasibility of implementation of the Alphabet Strategy: GAIA project (Global Alphabet Strategy Implementation Audit)

BACKGROUND: an audit to assess diabetes care quality worldwide, a questionnaire study seeking opinions on the merits of the AS, a pilot study to assess the practicality of implementation of the AS in a low socioeconomic setting. METHODS: Audit data was collected from 52 centres across 32 countries....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, James D, Saravanan, Ponnusamy, Varadhan, Lakshminarayanan, Morrissey, John R, Patel, Vinod
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4283094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25306156
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-467
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: an audit to assess diabetes care quality worldwide, a questionnaire study seeking opinions on the merits of the AS, a pilot study to assess the practicality of implementation of the AS in a low socioeconomic setting. METHODS: Audit data was collected from 52 centres across 32 countries. Data from 4537 patients were converted to Quality and Outcome Framework (QOF) scores to enable inter-centre comparison. These were compared to each country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and Total Health Expenditure percentage per capita (THE%). The opinions of diabetes patients and healthcare professionals from the diabetes care team at each of these centres were sought through a structured questionnaire. A retrospective audit on 100 randomly selected case notes was conducted prior to AS implementation in a diabetes outpatient clinic in India, followed by a prospective audit after four months to assess its impact on care quality. RESULTS: QOF scores showed wide variation across the centres (mean 49.0, range 10.2–90.1). Although there was a positive relationship between GDP and THE% to QOF scores, there were exceptions. 91% of healthcare professionals felt the AS approach was practical. Patients found the checklist to be a useful education tool. Significant improvements in several aspects of care as well as 36% improvement in QOF score were seen following implementation. CONCLUSIONS: International centres observed large variations in care quality, with standards frequently sub-optimal. 71% of health care professionals would consider adopting the AS in their daily practice. Implementation in a low resource country resulted in significant improvements in some aspects of diabetes care. The AS checklist for diabetes care is a freely available in the public domain encompassing patient education, care plans, and educational resources for healthcare professionals including summary guidelines. The AS may provide a unique approach in delivering high quality diabetes care in countries with limited resources. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-467) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.