Cargando…

Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies

Open esophagectomy (OE) requires extensive surgery and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the long-term results of esophageal cancer surgery are not satisfactory; hence, the best surgical approach is constantly under debate. During the last twenty years, minimally i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallner, Grzegorz, Zgodziński, Witold, Masiak-Segit, Wioletta, Skoczylas, Tomasz, Dąbrowski, Andrzej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4283863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26336413
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2014.43842
_version_ 1782351327703072768
author Wallner, Grzegorz
Zgodziński, Witold
Masiak-Segit, Wioletta
Skoczylas, Tomasz
Dąbrowski, Andrzej
author_facet Wallner, Grzegorz
Zgodziński, Witold
Masiak-Segit, Wioletta
Skoczylas, Tomasz
Dąbrowski, Andrzej
author_sort Wallner, Grzegorz
collection PubMed
description Open esophagectomy (OE) requires extensive surgery and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the long-term results of esophageal cancer surgery are not satisfactory; hence, the best surgical approach is constantly under debate. During the last twenty years, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) employing laparoscopy and/or thoracoscopy has been introduced in a growing number of centers worldwide. To date, several studies have demonstrated that MIE has better outcomes than OE, as it results in shorter hospital stay and decreased overall morbidity. However, the length of operating time in MIE is increased in comparison to OE. The survival benefit has been demonstrated to be similar in OE and MIE. Highly advanced laparo-thoracoscopic skills are required to perform MIE; along with the relatively long learning curve, this makes MIE feasible only in high-volume, experienced university surgical centers. There is a need for further large-scale comparative studies to prove the superiority of MIE over open surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4283863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42838632015-09-02 Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies Wallner, Grzegorz Zgodziński, Witold Masiak-Segit, Wioletta Skoczylas, Tomasz Dąbrowski, Andrzej Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol Thoracic Surgery Open esophagectomy (OE) requires extensive surgery and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the long-term results of esophageal cancer surgery are not satisfactory; hence, the best surgical approach is constantly under debate. During the last twenty years, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) employing laparoscopy and/or thoracoscopy has been introduced in a growing number of centers worldwide. To date, several studies have demonstrated that MIE has better outcomes than OE, as it results in shorter hospital stay and decreased overall morbidity. However, the length of operating time in MIE is increased in comparison to OE. The survival benefit has been demonstrated to be similar in OE and MIE. Highly advanced laparo-thoracoscopic skills are required to perform MIE; along with the relatively long learning curve, this makes MIE feasible only in high-volume, experienced university surgical centers. There is a need for further large-scale comparative studies to prove the superiority of MIE over open surgery. Termedia Publishing House 2014-06-29 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4283863/ /pubmed/26336413 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2014.43842 Text en Copyright © 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Thoracic Surgery
Wallner, Grzegorz
Zgodziński, Witold
Masiak-Segit, Wioletta
Skoczylas, Tomasz
Dąbrowski, Andrzej
Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies
title Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies
title_full Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies
title_fullStr Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies
title_full_unstemmed Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies
title_short Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies
title_sort minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies
topic Thoracic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4283863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26336413
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2014.43842
work_keys_str_mv AT wallnergrzegorz minimallyinvasivesurgeryforesophagealcancerbenefitsandcontroversies
AT zgodzinskiwitold minimallyinvasivesurgeryforesophagealcancerbenefitsandcontroversies
AT masiaksegitwioletta minimallyinvasivesurgeryforesophagealcancerbenefitsandcontroversies
AT skoczylastomasz minimallyinvasivesurgeryforesophagealcancerbenefitsandcontroversies
AT dabrowskiandrzej minimallyinvasivesurgeryforesophagealcancerbenefitsandcontroversies