Cargando…
Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies
Open esophagectomy (OE) requires extensive surgery and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the long-term results of esophageal cancer surgery are not satisfactory; hence, the best surgical approach is constantly under debate. During the last twenty years, minimally i...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4283863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26336413 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2014.43842 |
_version_ | 1782351327703072768 |
---|---|
author | Wallner, Grzegorz Zgodziński, Witold Masiak-Segit, Wioletta Skoczylas, Tomasz Dąbrowski, Andrzej |
author_facet | Wallner, Grzegorz Zgodziński, Witold Masiak-Segit, Wioletta Skoczylas, Tomasz Dąbrowski, Andrzej |
author_sort | Wallner, Grzegorz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Open esophagectomy (OE) requires extensive surgery and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the long-term results of esophageal cancer surgery are not satisfactory; hence, the best surgical approach is constantly under debate. During the last twenty years, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) employing laparoscopy and/or thoracoscopy has been introduced in a growing number of centers worldwide. To date, several studies have demonstrated that MIE has better outcomes than OE, as it results in shorter hospital stay and decreased overall morbidity. However, the length of operating time in MIE is increased in comparison to OE. The survival benefit has been demonstrated to be similar in OE and MIE. Highly advanced laparo-thoracoscopic skills are required to perform MIE; along with the relatively long learning curve, this makes MIE feasible only in high-volume, experienced university surgical centers. There is a need for further large-scale comparative studies to prove the superiority of MIE over open surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4283863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42838632015-09-02 Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies Wallner, Grzegorz Zgodziński, Witold Masiak-Segit, Wioletta Skoczylas, Tomasz Dąbrowski, Andrzej Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol Thoracic Surgery Open esophagectomy (OE) requires extensive surgery and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the long-term results of esophageal cancer surgery are not satisfactory; hence, the best surgical approach is constantly under debate. During the last twenty years, minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) employing laparoscopy and/or thoracoscopy has been introduced in a growing number of centers worldwide. To date, several studies have demonstrated that MIE has better outcomes than OE, as it results in shorter hospital stay and decreased overall morbidity. However, the length of operating time in MIE is increased in comparison to OE. The survival benefit has been demonstrated to be similar in OE and MIE. Highly advanced laparo-thoracoscopic skills are required to perform MIE; along with the relatively long learning curve, this makes MIE feasible only in high-volume, experienced university surgical centers. There is a need for further large-scale comparative studies to prove the superiority of MIE over open surgery. Termedia Publishing House 2014-06-29 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4283863/ /pubmed/26336413 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2014.43842 Text en Copyright © 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Thoracic Surgery Wallner, Grzegorz Zgodziński, Witold Masiak-Segit, Wioletta Skoczylas, Tomasz Dąbrowski, Andrzej Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies |
title | Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies |
title_full | Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies |
title_short | Minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies |
title_sort | minimally invasive surgery for esophageal cancer – benefits and controversies |
topic | Thoracic Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4283863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26336413 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/kitp.2014.43842 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wallnergrzegorz minimallyinvasivesurgeryforesophagealcancerbenefitsandcontroversies AT zgodzinskiwitold minimallyinvasivesurgeryforesophagealcancerbenefitsandcontroversies AT masiaksegitwioletta minimallyinvasivesurgeryforesophagealcancerbenefitsandcontroversies AT skoczylastomasz minimallyinvasivesurgeryforesophagealcancerbenefitsandcontroversies AT dabrowskiandrzej minimallyinvasivesurgeryforesophagealcancerbenefitsandcontroversies |