Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Although abbreviated surgery with planned reoperation (damage control surgery) is now widely used to manage major trauma patients, the procedure and its component interventions have not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While some have suggested the need for such tri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cosic, Nela, Roberts, Derek J, Stelfox, Henry T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4285082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25416175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-136
_version_ 1782351524826972160
author Cosic, Nela
Roberts, Derek J
Stelfox, Henry T
author_facet Cosic, Nela
Roberts, Derek J
Stelfox, Henry T
author_sort Cosic, Nela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although abbreviated surgery with planned reoperation (damage control surgery) is now widely used to manage major trauma patients, the procedure and its component interventions have not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While some have suggested the need for such trials, they are unlikely to be conducted because of patient safety concerns. As animal studies may overcome several of the limitations of existing observational damage control studies, the primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of damage control versus definitive surgery in experimental animal models of injury. METHODS/DESIGN: We will search electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library), conference abstracts, personal files, and bibliographies of included articles. We will include RCTs and prospective cohort studies that utilized an animal model of injury and compared damage control surgery (or specific damage control interventions or adjuncts) to definitive surgery (or specific definitive surgical interventions). Two investigators will independently evaluate the internal and external/construct validity of individual studies. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes will include blood loss amounts; blood pressures and heart rates; urinary outputs; core body temperatures; arterial lactate, pH, and base deficit/excess values; prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times; international normalized ratios; and thromboelastography (TEG) results/activated clotting times. We will calculate summary relative risks (RRs) of mortality and mean differences (for continuous outcomes) using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. Heterogeneity will be explored using subgroup meta-analysis and meta-regression. We will assess for publication bias using funnel plots and Begg’s and Egger’s tests. When evidence of publication bias exists, we will use the Duval and Tweedie trim and fill method to estimate the potential influence of this bias on pooled summary estimates. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury. Study results will be used to guide future clinical evaluations of damage control surgery, determine which animal study outcomes may potentially be generalizable to the clinical setting, and to provide guidelines to strengthen the conduct and relevance of future pre-clinical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4285082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42850822015-01-07 Efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Cosic, Nela Roberts, Derek J Stelfox, Henry T Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Although abbreviated surgery with planned reoperation (damage control surgery) is now widely used to manage major trauma patients, the procedure and its component interventions have not been evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While some have suggested the need for such trials, they are unlikely to be conducted because of patient safety concerns. As animal studies may overcome several of the limitations of existing observational damage control studies, the primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of damage control versus definitive surgery in experimental animal models of injury. METHODS/DESIGN: We will search electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library), conference abstracts, personal files, and bibliographies of included articles. We will include RCTs and prospective cohort studies that utilized an animal model of injury and compared damage control surgery (or specific damage control interventions or adjuncts) to definitive surgery (or specific definitive surgical interventions). Two investigators will independently evaluate the internal and external/construct validity of individual studies. The primary outcome will be all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes will include blood loss amounts; blood pressures and heart rates; urinary outputs; core body temperatures; arterial lactate, pH, and base deficit/excess values; prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times; international normalized ratios; and thromboelastography (TEG) results/activated clotting times. We will calculate summary relative risks (RRs) of mortality and mean differences (for continuous outcomes) using DerSimonian and Laird random effects models. Heterogeneity will be explored using subgroup meta-analysis and meta-regression. We will assess for publication bias using funnel plots and Begg’s and Egger’s tests. When evidence of publication bias exists, we will use the Duval and Tweedie trim and fill method to estimate the potential influence of this bias on pooled summary estimates. DISCUSSION: This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury. Study results will be used to guide future clinical evaluations of damage control surgery, determine which animal study outcomes may potentially be generalizable to the clinical setting, and to provide guidelines to strengthen the conduct and relevance of future pre-clinical studies. BioMed Central 2014-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4285082/ /pubmed/25416175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-136 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cosic et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Cosic, Nela
Roberts, Derek J
Stelfox, Henry T
Efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of damage control in experimental animal models of injury: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4285082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25416175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-136
work_keys_str_mv AT cosicnela efficacyandsafetyofdamagecontrolinexperimentalanimalmodelsofinjuryprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT robertsderekj efficacyandsafetyofdamagecontrolinexperimentalanimalmodelsofinjuryprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stelfoxhenryt efficacyandsafetyofdamagecontrolinexperimentalanimalmodelsofinjuryprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis