Cargando…

A New Framework for Cortico-Striatal Plasticity: Behavioural Theory Meets In Vitro Data at the Reinforcement-Action Interface

Operant learning requires that reinforcement signals interact with action representations at a suitable neural interface. Much evidence suggests that this occurs when phasic dopamine, acting as a reinforcement prediction error, gates plasticity at cortico-striatal synapses, and thereby changes the f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gurney, Kevin N., Humphries, Mark D., Redgrave, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4285402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25562526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002034
_version_ 1782351574250553344
author Gurney, Kevin N.
Humphries, Mark D.
Redgrave, Peter
author_facet Gurney, Kevin N.
Humphries, Mark D.
Redgrave, Peter
author_sort Gurney, Kevin N.
collection PubMed
description Operant learning requires that reinforcement signals interact with action representations at a suitable neural interface. Much evidence suggests that this occurs when phasic dopamine, acting as a reinforcement prediction error, gates plasticity at cortico-striatal synapses, and thereby changes the future likelihood of selecting the action(s) coded by striatal neurons. But this hypothesis faces serious challenges. First, cortico-striatal plasticity is inexplicably complex, depending on spike timing, dopamine level, and dopamine receptor type. Second, there is a credit assignment problem—action selection signals occur long before the consequent dopamine reinforcement signal. Third, the two types of striatal output neuron have apparently opposite effects on action selection. Whether these factors rule out the interface hypothesis and how they interact to produce reinforcement learning is unknown. We present a computational framework that addresses these challenges. We first predict the expected activity changes over an operant task for both types of action-coding striatal neuron, and show they co-operate to promote action selection in learning and compete to promote action suppression in extinction. Separately, we derive a complete model of dopamine and spike-timing dependent cortico-striatal plasticity from in vitro data. We then show this model produces the predicted activity changes necessary for learning and extinction in an operant task, a remarkable convergence of a bottom-up data-driven plasticity model with the top-down behavioural requirements of learning theory. Moreover, we show the complex dependencies of cortico-striatal plasticity are not only sufficient but necessary for learning and extinction. Validating the model, we show it can account for behavioural data describing extinction, renewal, and reacquisition, and replicate in vitro experimental data on cortico-striatal plasticity. By bridging the levels between the single synapse and behaviour, our model shows how striatum acts as the action-reinforcement interface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4285402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42854022015-01-12 A New Framework for Cortico-Striatal Plasticity: Behavioural Theory Meets In Vitro Data at the Reinforcement-Action Interface Gurney, Kevin N. Humphries, Mark D. Redgrave, Peter PLoS Biol Research Article Operant learning requires that reinforcement signals interact with action representations at a suitable neural interface. Much evidence suggests that this occurs when phasic dopamine, acting as a reinforcement prediction error, gates plasticity at cortico-striatal synapses, and thereby changes the future likelihood of selecting the action(s) coded by striatal neurons. But this hypothesis faces serious challenges. First, cortico-striatal plasticity is inexplicably complex, depending on spike timing, dopamine level, and dopamine receptor type. Second, there is a credit assignment problem—action selection signals occur long before the consequent dopamine reinforcement signal. Third, the two types of striatal output neuron have apparently opposite effects on action selection. Whether these factors rule out the interface hypothesis and how they interact to produce reinforcement learning is unknown. We present a computational framework that addresses these challenges. We first predict the expected activity changes over an operant task for both types of action-coding striatal neuron, and show they co-operate to promote action selection in learning and compete to promote action suppression in extinction. Separately, we derive a complete model of dopamine and spike-timing dependent cortico-striatal plasticity from in vitro data. We then show this model produces the predicted activity changes necessary for learning and extinction in an operant task, a remarkable convergence of a bottom-up data-driven plasticity model with the top-down behavioural requirements of learning theory. Moreover, we show the complex dependencies of cortico-striatal plasticity are not only sufficient but necessary for learning and extinction. Validating the model, we show it can account for behavioural data describing extinction, renewal, and reacquisition, and replicate in vitro experimental data on cortico-striatal plasticity. By bridging the levels between the single synapse and behaviour, our model shows how striatum acts as the action-reinforcement interface. Public Library of Science 2015-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4285402/ /pubmed/25562526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002034 Text en © 2015 Gurney et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gurney, Kevin N.
Humphries, Mark D.
Redgrave, Peter
A New Framework for Cortico-Striatal Plasticity: Behavioural Theory Meets In Vitro Data at the Reinforcement-Action Interface
title A New Framework for Cortico-Striatal Plasticity: Behavioural Theory Meets In Vitro Data at the Reinforcement-Action Interface
title_full A New Framework for Cortico-Striatal Plasticity: Behavioural Theory Meets In Vitro Data at the Reinforcement-Action Interface
title_fullStr A New Framework for Cortico-Striatal Plasticity: Behavioural Theory Meets In Vitro Data at the Reinforcement-Action Interface
title_full_unstemmed A New Framework for Cortico-Striatal Plasticity: Behavioural Theory Meets In Vitro Data at the Reinforcement-Action Interface
title_short A New Framework for Cortico-Striatal Plasticity: Behavioural Theory Meets In Vitro Data at the Reinforcement-Action Interface
title_sort new framework for cortico-striatal plasticity: behavioural theory meets in vitro data at the reinforcement-action interface
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4285402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25562526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002034
work_keys_str_mv AT gurneykevinn anewframeworkforcorticostriatalplasticitybehaviouraltheorymeetsinvitrodataatthereinforcementactioninterface
AT humphriesmarkd anewframeworkforcorticostriatalplasticitybehaviouraltheorymeetsinvitrodataatthereinforcementactioninterface
AT redgravepeter anewframeworkforcorticostriatalplasticitybehaviouraltheorymeetsinvitrodataatthereinforcementactioninterface
AT gurneykevinn newframeworkforcorticostriatalplasticitybehaviouraltheorymeetsinvitrodataatthereinforcementactioninterface
AT humphriesmarkd newframeworkforcorticostriatalplasticitybehaviouraltheorymeetsinvitrodataatthereinforcementactioninterface
AT redgravepeter newframeworkforcorticostriatalplasticitybehaviouraltheorymeetsinvitrodataatthereinforcementactioninterface