Cargando…

Impact of missing participant data for dichotomous outcomes on pooled effect estimates in systematic reviews: a protocol for a methodological study

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on how authors conducting meta-analysis should deal with trial participants with missing outcome data. The objectives of this study are to assess in Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews: (1) which categories of trial participants the systematic review author...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Akl, Elie A, Kahale, Lara A, Agarwal, Arnav, Al-Matari, Nada, Ebrahim, Shanil, Alexander, Paul Elias, Briel, Matthias, Brignardello-Petersen, Romina, Busse, Jason W, Diab, Batoul, Iorio, Alfonso, Kwong, Joey, Li, Ling, Lopes, Luciane Cruz, Mustafa, Reem, Neumann, Ignacio, Tikkinen, Kari AO, Vandvik, Per Olav, Zhang, Yuqing, Alonso-Coello, Pablo, Guyatt, Gordon
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2014
Materias:	Protocol
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4285551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25423894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-137

Ejemplares similares

Addressing Dichotomous Data for Participants Excluded from Trial Analysis: A Guide for Systematic Reviewers
por: Akl, Elie A., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches
por: Akl, Elie A., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide
por: Akl, Elie A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews?
por: Vandvik, Per Olav, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Meta-Analyses Proved Inconsistent in How Missing Data Were Handled Across Their Included Primary Trials: A Methodological Survey
por: Kahale, Lara A, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Potential impact of missing outcome data on treatment effects in systematic reviews: imputation study
por: Kahale, Lara A, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Correction: A methodological survey of the analysis, reporting and interpretation of Absolute Risk ReductiOn in systematic revieWs (ARROW): a study protocol
por: Alonso-Coello, Pablo, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A methodological survey of the analysis, reporting and interpretation of Absolute Risk ReductiOn in systematic revieWs (ARROW): a study protocol
por: Alonso-Coello, Pablo, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey
por: Akl, Elie A, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Evaluating patient values and preferences for thromboprophylaxis decision making during pregnancy: a study protocol
por: Alonso-Coello, Pablo, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens
por: Agoritsas, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Multilayered and digitally structured presentation formats of trustworthy recommendations: a combined survey and randomised trial
por: Brandt, Linn, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Requirements of Clinical Journals for Authors’ Disclosure of Financial and Non-Financial Conflicts of Interest: A Cross Sectional Study
por: Shawwa, Khaled, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Corticosteroids for treatment of sore throat: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials
por: Sadeghirad, Behnam, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Methodological survey of designed uneven randomization trials (DU-RANDOM): a protocol
por: Wu, Darong, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Decision aids linked to evidence summaries and clinical practice guidelines: results from user-testing in clinical encounters
por: Heen, Anja Fog, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison between the standard and a new alternative format of the Summary-of-Findings tables in Cochrane review users: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
por: Carrasco-Labra, Alonso, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Erratum to: Aspiration thrombectomy prior to percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: El Dib, Regina, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Aspiration thrombectomy prior to percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: El Dib, Regina, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Incretin treatment and risk of pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies
por: Li, Ling, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

What is a disease? Perspectives of the public, health professionals and legislators
por: Tikkinen, Kari A O, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Corticostriatal Projection Neurons – Dichotomous Types and Dichotomous Functions
por: Reiner, Anton, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

When applying GRADE, how do we decide the target of certainty of evidence rating?
por: Zeng, Linan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Meta‐analysis of antibiotics versus appendicectomy for non‐perforated acute appendicitis
por: Sallinen, V., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Subgroup Analysis of Trials Is Rarely Easy (SATIRE): a study protocol for a systematic review to characterize the analysis, reporting, and claim of subgroup effects in randomized trials
por: Sun, Xin, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Public, health professional and legislator perspectives on the concept of psychiatric disease: a population-based survey
por: Tikkinen, Kari A O, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Knee arthroscopy versus conservative management in patients with degenerative knee disease: a systematic review
por: Brignardello-Petersen, Romina, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Reporting of financial and non-financial conflicts of interest by authors of systematic reviews: a methodological survey
por: Hakoum, Maram B, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework: a report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels
por: Neumann, Ignacio, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

The influence of study characteristics on reporting of subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: systematic review
por: Sun, Xin, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Less intensive antileukemic therapies (monotherapy and/or combination) for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia who are not candidates for intensive antileukemic therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Colunga-Lozano, Luis Enrique, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Exponentially dichotomous operators and applications
por: van der Mee, Cornelis
Publicado: (2008)

Dichotomous role of autophagy in cancer
por: Arif, Amin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Incretin based treatments and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Liu, Jiali, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Safety engineered injection devices for intramuscular, subcutaneous and intradermal injections in healthcare delivery settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Harb, Alain C., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Use of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Ballout, Rami A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: a protocol for a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
por: Busse, Jason W, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Arthroplasty versus Arthrodesis for Single-Level Cervical Spondylosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Fallah, Aria, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Dichotomous Organization of the External Globus Pallidus
por: Mallet, Nicolas, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Proposal for an index to evaluate dichotomous keys
por: Sinh, Nguyen Van, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_d48i4luujgs43lifjnissf3f74