Cargando…
CFA with binary variables in small samples: a comparison of two methods
Asymptotically optimal correlation structure methods with binary data can break down in small samples. A new correlation structure methodology based on a recently developed odds-ratio (OR) approximation to the tetrachoric correlation coefficient is proposed as an alternative to the LPB approach prop...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4285741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01515 |
_version_ | 1782351590731022336 |
---|---|
author | Savalei, Victoria Bonett, Douglas G. Bentler, Peter M. |
author_facet | Savalei, Victoria Bonett, Douglas G. Bentler, Peter M. |
author_sort | Savalei, Victoria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Asymptotically optimal correlation structure methods with binary data can break down in small samples. A new correlation structure methodology based on a recently developed odds-ratio (OR) approximation to the tetrachoric correlation coefficient is proposed as an alternative to the LPB approach proposed by Lee et al. (1995). Unweighted least squares (ULS) estimation with robust standard errors and generalized least squares (GLS) estimation methods were compared. Confidence intervals and tests for individual model parameters exhibited the best performance using the OR approach with ULS estimation. The goodness-of-fit chi-square test exhibited the best Type I error control using the LPB approach with ULS estimation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4285741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42857412015-02-23 CFA with binary variables in small samples: a comparison of two methods Savalei, Victoria Bonett, Douglas G. Bentler, Peter M. Front Psychol Psychology Asymptotically optimal correlation structure methods with binary data can break down in small samples. A new correlation structure methodology based on a recently developed odds-ratio (OR) approximation to the tetrachoric correlation coefficient is proposed as an alternative to the LPB approach proposed by Lee et al. (1995). Unweighted least squares (ULS) estimation with robust standard errors and generalized least squares (GLS) estimation methods were compared. Confidence intervals and tests for individual model parameters exhibited the best performance using the OR approach with ULS estimation. The goodness-of-fit chi-square test exhibited the best Type I error control using the LPB approach with ULS estimation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4285741/ /pubmed/25709585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01515 Text en Copyright © 2015 Savalei, Bonett and Bentler. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Savalei, Victoria Bonett, Douglas G. Bentler, Peter M. CFA with binary variables in small samples: a comparison of two methods |
title | CFA with binary variables in small samples: a comparison of two methods |
title_full | CFA with binary variables in small samples: a comparison of two methods |
title_fullStr | CFA with binary variables in small samples: a comparison of two methods |
title_full_unstemmed | CFA with binary variables in small samples: a comparison of two methods |
title_short | CFA with binary variables in small samples: a comparison of two methods |
title_sort | cfa with binary variables in small samples: a comparison of two methods |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4285741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01515 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT savaleivictoria cfawithbinaryvariablesinsmallsamplesacomparisonoftwomethods AT bonettdouglasg cfawithbinaryvariablesinsmallsamplesacomparisonoftwomethods AT bentlerpeterm cfawithbinaryvariablesinsmallsamplesacomparisonoftwomethods |