Cargando…

Entecavir Versus Lamivudine Therapy for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B-Associated Liver Failure: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Nucleoside analogues are recommended as antiviral treatments for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated liver failure. Clinical data comparing entecavir (ETV) and lamivudine (LAM) are inconsistent in this setting. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of ETV and LAM in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiaoguo, An, Yong, Jiang, Xuemei, Xu, Minling, Xu, Linlin, Chen, Shijun, Xi, Yaguang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4286714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25598786
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/hepatmon.19164
_version_ 1782351689944137728
author Zhang, Xiaoguo
An, Yong
Jiang, Xuemei
Xu, Minling
Xu, Linlin
Chen, Shijun
Xi, Yaguang
author_facet Zhang, Xiaoguo
An, Yong
Jiang, Xuemei
Xu, Minling
Xu, Linlin
Chen, Shijun
Xi, Yaguang
author_sort Zhang, Xiaoguo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nucleoside analogues are recommended as antiviral treatments for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated liver failure. Clinical data comparing entecavir (ETV) and lamivudine (LAM) are inconsistent in this setting. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of ETV and LAM in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB)-associated liver failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed on articles published until January 2014 on therapy with ETV and LAM for patients with CHB-associated liver failure. Risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) were used to measure the effects. Survival rate was the primary efficacy measure, while total bilirubin (TBIL), prothrombin activity (PTA) changes and HBV DNA negative change rates were secondary efficacy measures. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of the two drugs. Safety of ETV and LAM was observed. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials and nine retrospective cohort studies comprising a total of 1549 patients were selected. Overall analysis revealed comparable survival rates between patients received ETV and those received LAM (4 weeks: RR = 1.03, 95%CI [0.89, 1.18], P = 0.73; 8 weeks: RR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.85, 1.14], P = 0.84; 12 weeks: RR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.90, 1.08], P = 0.70; 24 weeks: RR = 1.02, 95% CI [0.94, 1.10], P = 0.66). After 24 weeks of treatment, patients treated with ETV had a significantly lower TBIL levels (MD = -37.34, 95% CI [-63.57, -11.11], P = 0.005), higher PTA levels (MD = 11.10, 95% CI [2.47, 19.73], P = 0.01) and higher HBV DNA negative rates (RR = 2.76, 95% CI [1.69, 4.51], P < 0.0001) than those treated with LAM. In addition, no drug related adverse effects were observed in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: ETV and LAM treatments had similar effects to improve 24 weeks survival rate of patients with CHB-associated liver failure, but ETV was associated with greater clinical improvement. Both drugs were tolerated well during the treatment. It is suggested to perform further studies to verify the results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4286714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42867142015-01-16 Entecavir Versus Lamivudine Therapy for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B-Associated Liver Failure: A Meta-Analysis Zhang, Xiaoguo An, Yong Jiang, Xuemei Xu, Minling Xu, Linlin Chen, Shijun Xi, Yaguang Hepat Mon Research Article BACKGROUND: Nucleoside analogues are recommended as antiviral treatments for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated liver failure. Clinical data comparing entecavir (ETV) and lamivudine (LAM) are inconsistent in this setting. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of ETV and LAM in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB)-associated liver failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed on articles published until January 2014 on therapy with ETV and LAM for patients with CHB-associated liver failure. Risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) were used to measure the effects. Survival rate was the primary efficacy measure, while total bilirubin (TBIL), prothrombin activity (PTA) changes and HBV DNA negative change rates were secondary efficacy measures. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of the two drugs. Safety of ETV and LAM was observed. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials and nine retrospective cohort studies comprising a total of 1549 patients were selected. Overall analysis revealed comparable survival rates between patients received ETV and those received LAM (4 weeks: RR = 1.03, 95%CI [0.89, 1.18], P = 0.73; 8 weeks: RR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.85, 1.14], P = 0.84; 12 weeks: RR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.90, 1.08], P = 0.70; 24 weeks: RR = 1.02, 95% CI [0.94, 1.10], P = 0.66). After 24 weeks of treatment, patients treated with ETV had a significantly lower TBIL levels (MD = -37.34, 95% CI [-63.57, -11.11], P = 0.005), higher PTA levels (MD = 11.10, 95% CI [2.47, 19.73], P = 0.01) and higher HBV DNA negative rates (RR = 2.76, 95% CI [1.69, 4.51], P < 0.0001) than those treated with LAM. In addition, no drug related adverse effects were observed in the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: ETV and LAM treatments had similar effects to improve 24 weeks survival rate of patients with CHB-associated liver failure, but ETV was associated with greater clinical improvement. Both drugs were tolerated well during the treatment. It is suggested to perform further studies to verify the results. Kowsar 2014-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4286714/ /pubmed/25598786 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/hepatmon.19164 Text en Copyright © 2014, Kowsar Corp. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Xiaoguo
An, Yong
Jiang, Xuemei
Xu, Minling
Xu, Linlin
Chen, Shijun
Xi, Yaguang
Entecavir Versus Lamivudine Therapy for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B-Associated Liver Failure: A Meta-Analysis
title Entecavir Versus Lamivudine Therapy for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B-Associated Liver Failure: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Entecavir Versus Lamivudine Therapy for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B-Associated Liver Failure: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Entecavir Versus Lamivudine Therapy for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B-Associated Liver Failure: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Entecavir Versus Lamivudine Therapy for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B-Associated Liver Failure: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Entecavir Versus Lamivudine Therapy for Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B-Associated Liver Failure: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort entecavir versus lamivudine therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis b-associated liver failure: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4286714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25598786
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/hepatmon.19164
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiaoguo entecavirversuslamivudinetherapyforpatientswithchronichepatitisbassociatedliverfailureametaanalysis
AT anyong entecavirversuslamivudinetherapyforpatientswithchronichepatitisbassociatedliverfailureametaanalysis
AT jiangxuemei entecavirversuslamivudinetherapyforpatientswithchronichepatitisbassociatedliverfailureametaanalysis
AT xuminling entecavirversuslamivudinetherapyforpatientswithchronichepatitisbassociatedliverfailureametaanalysis
AT xulinlin entecavirversuslamivudinetherapyforpatientswithchronichepatitisbassociatedliverfailureametaanalysis
AT chenshijun entecavirversuslamivudinetherapyforpatientswithchronichepatitisbassociatedliverfailureametaanalysis
AT xiyaguang entecavirversuslamivudinetherapyforpatientswithchronichepatitisbassociatedliverfailureametaanalysis