Cargando…

Comparison of hCG triggering versus hCG in combination with a GnRH agonist: a prospective randomized controlled trial

A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing two groups of ICSI (intra-cytoplasmatic sperm injection) patients with a different form of triggering the final oocyte maturation has been performed. All patients received an ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) using an antagonist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Decleer, W., Osmanagaoglu, K., Seynhave, B., Kolibianakis, S., Tarlatzis, B., Devroey, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universa Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4286859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25593695
_version_ 1782351721532489728
author Decleer, W.
Osmanagaoglu, K.
Seynhave, B.
Kolibianakis, S.
Tarlatzis, B.
Devroey, P.
author_facet Decleer, W.
Osmanagaoglu, K.
Seynhave, B.
Kolibianakis, S.
Tarlatzis, B.
Devroey, P.
author_sort Decleer, W.
collection PubMed
description A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing two groups of ICSI (intra-cytoplasmatic sperm injection) patients with a different form of triggering the final oocyte maturation has been performed. All patients received an ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) using an antagonist protocol using recombinant-FSH (rec-FSH) and Ganirelix. 120 Patients were randomized into two groups with similar clinical parameters. The first group had triggering with hCG, whereas the second group received a combination of hCG + GnRH agonist (Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone). As the primary endpoint, the number of metaphase II oocytes were analysed, the secondary endpoints were the number of cumulus oocyte complexes (COC), the number of fertilized oocytes, embryo morphology, pregnancy rate and the number of cryopreserved embryos. The mean number of MII oocytes in the hCG triggered group was 9.2 compared with 10.3 in the hCG-GnRH agonist group. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of COCs or pregnancy rates. However, the number of patients who received at least one embryo of excellent quality was significantly higher (p = 0.001) in the group with the combined triggering (45 out of 61 patients or 73.8%) versus the group with hCG triggering alone (28 out of 59 patients or 47.5%). The number of cryopreserved embryos was also higher in this group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4286859
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Universa Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42868592015-01-15 Comparison of hCG triggering versus hCG in combination with a GnRH agonist: a prospective randomized controlled trial Decleer, W. Osmanagaoglu, K. Seynhave, B. Kolibianakis, S. Tarlatzis, B. Devroey, P. Facts Views Vis Obgyn Original Paper A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing two groups of ICSI (intra-cytoplasmatic sperm injection) patients with a different form of triggering the final oocyte maturation has been performed. All patients received an ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) using an antagonist protocol using recombinant-FSH (rec-FSH) and Ganirelix. 120 Patients were randomized into two groups with similar clinical parameters. The first group had triggering with hCG, whereas the second group received a combination of hCG + GnRH agonist (Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone). As the primary endpoint, the number of metaphase II oocytes were analysed, the secondary endpoints were the number of cumulus oocyte complexes (COC), the number of fertilized oocytes, embryo morphology, pregnancy rate and the number of cryopreserved embryos. The mean number of MII oocytes in the hCG triggered group was 9.2 compared with 10.3 in the hCG-GnRH agonist group. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of COCs or pregnancy rates. However, the number of patients who received at least one embryo of excellent quality was significantly higher (p = 0.001) in the group with the combined triggering (45 out of 61 patients or 73.8%) versus the group with hCG triggering alone (28 out of 59 patients or 47.5%). The number of cryopreserved embryos was also higher in this group. Universa Press 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4286859/ /pubmed/25593695 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Decleer, W.
Osmanagaoglu, K.
Seynhave, B.
Kolibianakis, S.
Tarlatzis, B.
Devroey, P.
Comparison of hCG triggering versus hCG in combination with a GnRH agonist: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of hCG triggering versus hCG in combination with a GnRH agonist: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of hCG triggering versus hCG in combination with a GnRH agonist: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of hCG triggering versus hCG in combination with a GnRH agonist: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of hCG triggering versus hCG in combination with a GnRH agonist: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of hCG triggering versus hCG in combination with a GnRH agonist: a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of hcg triggering versus hcg in combination with a gnrh agonist: a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4286859/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25593695
work_keys_str_mv AT decleerw comparisonofhcgtriggeringversushcgincombinationwithagnrhagonistaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT osmanagaogluk comparisonofhcgtriggeringversushcgincombinationwithagnrhagonistaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT seynhaveb comparisonofhcgtriggeringversushcgincombinationwithagnrhagonistaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kolibianakiss comparisonofhcgtriggeringversushcgincombinationwithagnrhagonistaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tarlatzisb comparisonofhcgtriggeringversushcgincombinationwithagnrhagonistaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT devroeyp comparisonofhcgtriggeringversushcgincombinationwithagnrhagonistaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial