Cargando…

Current view on ductal carcinoma in situ and importance of the margin thresholds: A review

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous group of diseases that differ in biology and clinical behaviour. Until 1980, DCIS represented less than 1% of all breast cancer cases. With the increased utilization of mammography, DCIS now accounts for 15% to 25% of newly diagnosed breast cancer c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Cleef, A., Altintas, S., Huizing, M., Papadimitriou, K., Van Dam, P., Tjalma, W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Universa Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4286860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25593696
_version_ 1782351721756884992
author Van Cleef, A.
Altintas, S.
Huizing, M.
Papadimitriou, K.
Van Dam, P.
Tjalma, W.
author_facet Van Cleef, A.
Altintas, S.
Huizing, M.
Papadimitriou, K.
Van Dam, P.
Tjalma, W.
author_sort Van Cleef, A.
collection PubMed
description Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous group of diseases that differ in biology and clinical behaviour. Until 1980, DCIS represented less than 1% of all breast cancer cases. With the increased utilization of mammography, DCIS now accounts for 15% to 25% of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases. The Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VPNI) is a commonly used tool for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treatment approach. Patient age, tumour size, tumour margins and pathological grade are used in order to stratify patients into three groups pertaining to risk of local recurrence: low-, intermediate- and high risk. Patients in the low-risk subgroup will always be treated with excision alone, while in the highest subgroup mastectomy is the safest option. Just like invasive breast cancer (IBC) there might be a curative dilemma in the intermediate-risk group. Many trials confirm that tumour margins are the most important prognostic factor of local recurrence for DCIS patients treated with breast conserving surgery alone or with breast conserving surgery plus radiotherapy. In this article we focused specifically on the literature concerning margin thresholds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4286860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Universa Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42868602015-01-15 Current view on ductal carcinoma in situ and importance of the margin thresholds: A review Van Cleef, A. Altintas, S. Huizing, M. Papadimitriou, K. Van Dam, P. Tjalma, W. Facts Views Vis Obgyn Review Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous group of diseases that differ in biology and clinical behaviour. Until 1980, DCIS represented less than 1% of all breast cancer cases. With the increased utilization of mammography, DCIS now accounts for 15% to 25% of newly diagnosed breast cancer cases. The Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VPNI) is a commonly used tool for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) treatment approach. Patient age, tumour size, tumour margins and pathological grade are used in order to stratify patients into three groups pertaining to risk of local recurrence: low-, intermediate- and high risk. Patients in the low-risk subgroup will always be treated with excision alone, while in the highest subgroup mastectomy is the safest option. Just like invasive breast cancer (IBC) there might be a curative dilemma in the intermediate-risk group. Many trials confirm that tumour margins are the most important prognostic factor of local recurrence for DCIS patients treated with breast conserving surgery alone or with breast conserving surgery plus radiotherapy. In this article we focused specifically on the literature concerning margin thresholds. Universa Press 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4286860/ /pubmed/25593696 Text en Copyright: © 2014 Facts, Views & Vision http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Van Cleef, A.
Altintas, S.
Huizing, M.
Papadimitriou, K.
Van Dam, P.
Tjalma, W.
Current view on ductal carcinoma in situ and importance of the margin thresholds: A review
title Current view on ductal carcinoma in situ and importance of the margin thresholds: A review
title_full Current view on ductal carcinoma in situ and importance of the margin thresholds: A review
title_fullStr Current view on ductal carcinoma in situ and importance of the margin thresholds: A review
title_full_unstemmed Current view on ductal carcinoma in situ and importance of the margin thresholds: A review
title_short Current view on ductal carcinoma in situ and importance of the margin thresholds: A review
title_sort current view on ductal carcinoma in situ and importance of the margin thresholds: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4286860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25593696
work_keys_str_mv AT vancleefa currentviewonductalcarcinomainsituandimportanceofthemarginthresholdsareview
AT altintass currentviewonductalcarcinomainsituandimportanceofthemarginthresholdsareview
AT huizingm currentviewonductalcarcinomainsituandimportanceofthemarginthresholdsareview
AT papadimitriouk currentviewonductalcarcinomainsituandimportanceofthemarginthresholdsareview
AT vandamp currentviewonductalcarcinomainsituandimportanceofthemarginthresholdsareview
AT tjalmaw currentviewonductalcarcinomainsituandimportanceofthemarginthresholdsareview