Cargando…

Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics

Increasing sensitivity of modern evaluation tools allows for the study of weaker electric stimulation effects on neural populations. In the current study we examined the effects of sham continuous theta burst (cTBS) transcranial magnetic stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Opitz, Alexander, Legon, Wynn, Mueller, Jerel, Barbour, Aaron, Paulus, Walter, Tyler, William J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4287020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620925
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01043
_version_ 1782351747786735616
author Opitz, Alexander
Legon, Wynn
Mueller, Jerel
Barbour, Aaron
Paulus, Walter
Tyler, William J.
author_facet Opitz, Alexander
Legon, Wynn
Mueller, Jerel
Barbour, Aaron
Paulus, Walter
Tyler, William J.
author_sort Opitz, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Increasing sensitivity of modern evaluation tools allows for the study of weaker electric stimulation effects on neural populations. In the current study we examined the effects of sham continuous theta burst (cTBS) transcranial magnetic stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) upon somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and frontal-parietal phase coupling of alpha and beta bands. Sham TMS results in an induced electric field amplitude roughly 5% that of real TMS with a similar spatial extent in cortex. Both real and sham cTBS reduced the amplitude of the frontal P14-N30 SEP and increased local phase coupling in the alpha-beta frequency bands of left frontal cortex. In addition, both sham and real cTBS increased frontal-parietal phase coupling in the alpha-beta bands concomitant with an increase in amplitude of parietal P50-N70 complex. These data suggest that weak electric fields from sham cTBS can affect both local and downstream neuronal circuits, though in a different manner than high strength TMS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4287020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42870202015-01-23 Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics Opitz, Alexander Legon, Wynn Mueller, Jerel Barbour, Aaron Paulus, Walter Tyler, William J. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Increasing sensitivity of modern evaluation tools allows for the study of weaker electric stimulation effects on neural populations. In the current study we examined the effects of sham continuous theta burst (cTBS) transcranial magnetic stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) upon somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and frontal-parietal phase coupling of alpha and beta bands. Sham TMS results in an induced electric field amplitude roughly 5% that of real TMS with a similar spatial extent in cortex. Both real and sham cTBS reduced the amplitude of the frontal P14-N30 SEP and increased local phase coupling in the alpha-beta frequency bands of left frontal cortex. In addition, both sham and real cTBS increased frontal-parietal phase coupling in the alpha-beta bands concomitant with an increase in amplitude of parietal P50-N70 complex. These data suggest that weak electric fields from sham cTBS can affect both local and downstream neuronal circuits, though in a different manner than high strength TMS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4287020/ /pubmed/25620925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01043 Text en Copyright © 2015 Opitz, Legon, Mueller, Barbour, Paulus and Tyler. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Opitz, Alexander
Legon, Wynn
Mueller, Jerel
Barbour, Aaron
Paulus, Walter
Tyler, William J.
Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics
title Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics
title_full Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics
title_fullStr Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics
title_short Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics
title_sort is sham ctbs real ctbs? the effect on eeg dynamics
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4287020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620925
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01043
work_keys_str_mv AT opitzalexander isshamctbsrealctbstheeffectoneegdynamics
AT legonwynn isshamctbsrealctbstheeffectoneegdynamics
AT muellerjerel isshamctbsrealctbstheeffectoneegdynamics
AT barbouraaron isshamctbsrealctbstheeffectoneegdynamics
AT pauluswalter isshamctbsrealctbstheeffectoneegdynamics
AT tylerwilliamj isshamctbsrealctbstheeffectoneegdynamics