Cargando…
Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics
Increasing sensitivity of modern evaluation tools allows for the study of weaker electric stimulation effects on neural populations. In the current study we examined the effects of sham continuous theta burst (cTBS) transcranial magnetic stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4287020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01043 |
_version_ | 1782351747786735616 |
---|---|
author | Opitz, Alexander Legon, Wynn Mueller, Jerel Barbour, Aaron Paulus, Walter Tyler, William J. |
author_facet | Opitz, Alexander Legon, Wynn Mueller, Jerel Barbour, Aaron Paulus, Walter Tyler, William J. |
author_sort | Opitz, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | Increasing sensitivity of modern evaluation tools allows for the study of weaker electric stimulation effects on neural populations. In the current study we examined the effects of sham continuous theta burst (cTBS) transcranial magnetic stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) upon somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and frontal-parietal phase coupling of alpha and beta bands. Sham TMS results in an induced electric field amplitude roughly 5% that of real TMS with a similar spatial extent in cortex. Both real and sham cTBS reduced the amplitude of the frontal P14-N30 SEP and increased local phase coupling in the alpha-beta frequency bands of left frontal cortex. In addition, both sham and real cTBS increased frontal-parietal phase coupling in the alpha-beta bands concomitant with an increase in amplitude of parietal P50-N70 complex. These data suggest that weak electric fields from sham cTBS can affect both local and downstream neuronal circuits, though in a different manner than high strength TMS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4287020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42870202015-01-23 Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics Opitz, Alexander Legon, Wynn Mueller, Jerel Barbour, Aaron Paulus, Walter Tyler, William J. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Increasing sensitivity of modern evaluation tools allows for the study of weaker electric stimulation effects on neural populations. In the current study we examined the effects of sham continuous theta burst (cTBS) transcranial magnetic stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) upon somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and frontal-parietal phase coupling of alpha and beta bands. Sham TMS results in an induced electric field amplitude roughly 5% that of real TMS with a similar spatial extent in cortex. Both real and sham cTBS reduced the amplitude of the frontal P14-N30 SEP and increased local phase coupling in the alpha-beta frequency bands of left frontal cortex. In addition, both sham and real cTBS increased frontal-parietal phase coupling in the alpha-beta bands concomitant with an increase in amplitude of parietal P50-N70 complex. These data suggest that weak electric fields from sham cTBS can affect both local and downstream neuronal circuits, though in a different manner than high strength TMS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4287020/ /pubmed/25620925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01043 Text en Copyright © 2015 Opitz, Legon, Mueller, Barbour, Paulus and Tyler. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Opitz, Alexander Legon, Wynn Mueller, Jerel Barbour, Aaron Paulus, Walter Tyler, William J. Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics |
title | Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics |
title_full | Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics |
title_fullStr | Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics |
title_full_unstemmed | Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics |
title_short | Is sham cTBS real cTBS? The effect on EEG dynamics |
title_sort | is sham ctbs real ctbs? the effect on eeg dynamics |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4287020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620925 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT opitzalexander isshamctbsrealctbstheeffectoneegdynamics AT legonwynn isshamctbsrealctbstheeffectoneegdynamics AT muellerjerel isshamctbsrealctbstheeffectoneegdynamics AT barbouraaron isshamctbsrealctbstheeffectoneegdynamics AT pauluswalter isshamctbsrealctbstheeffectoneegdynamics AT tylerwilliamj isshamctbsrealctbstheeffectoneegdynamics |