Cargando…

Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions

A variety of converging operations demonstrate key differences between separable dimensions, which can be analyzed independently, and integral dimensions, which are processed in a non-analytic fashion. A recent investigation of response time distributions, applying a set of logical rule-based models...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blunden, Anthea G., Wang, Tony, Griffiths, David W., Little, Daniel R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4288243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620941
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01531
_version_ 1782351938725085184
author Blunden, Anthea G.
Wang, Tony
Griffiths, David W.
Little, Daniel R.
author_facet Blunden, Anthea G.
Wang, Tony
Griffiths, David W.
Little, Daniel R.
author_sort Blunden, Anthea G.
collection PubMed
description A variety of converging operations demonstrate key differences between separable dimensions, which can be analyzed independently, and integral dimensions, which are processed in a non-analytic fashion. A recent investigation of response time distributions, applying a set of logical rule-based models, demonstrated that integral dimensions are pooled into a single coactive processing channel, in contrast to separable dimensions, which are processed in multiple, independent processing channels. This paper examines the claim that arbitrary dimensions created by factorially morphing four faces are processed in an integral manner. In two experiments, 16 participants completed a categorization task in which either upright or inverted morph stimuli were classified in a speeded fashion. Analyses focused on contrasting different assumptions about the psychological representation of the stimuli, perceptual and decisional separability, and the processing architecture. We report consistent individual differences which demonstrate a mixture of some observers who demonstrate coactive processing with other observers who process the dimensions in a parallel self-terminating manner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4288243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42882432015-01-23 Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions Blunden, Anthea G. Wang, Tony Griffiths, David W. Little, Daniel R. Front Psychol Psychology A variety of converging operations demonstrate key differences between separable dimensions, which can be analyzed independently, and integral dimensions, which are processed in a non-analytic fashion. A recent investigation of response time distributions, applying a set of logical rule-based models, demonstrated that integral dimensions are pooled into a single coactive processing channel, in contrast to separable dimensions, which are processed in multiple, independent processing channels. This paper examines the claim that arbitrary dimensions created by factorially morphing four faces are processed in an integral manner. In two experiments, 16 participants completed a categorization task in which either upright or inverted morph stimuli were classified in a speeded fashion. Analyses focused on contrasting different assumptions about the psychological representation of the stimuli, perceptual and decisional separability, and the processing architecture. We report consistent individual differences which demonstrate a mixture of some observers who demonstrate coactive processing with other observers who process the dimensions in a parallel self-terminating manner. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4288243/ /pubmed/25620941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01531 Text en Copyright © 2015 Blunden, Wang, Griffiths and Little. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Blunden, Anthea G.
Wang, Tony
Griffiths, David W.
Little, Daniel R.
Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions
title Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions
title_full Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions
title_fullStr Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions
title_full_unstemmed Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions
title_short Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions
title_sort logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4288243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620941
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01531
work_keys_str_mv AT blundenantheag logicalrulesandtheclassificationofintegraldimensionsindividualdifferencesintheprocessingofarbitrarydimensions
AT wangtony logicalrulesandtheclassificationofintegraldimensionsindividualdifferencesintheprocessingofarbitrarydimensions
AT griffithsdavidw logicalrulesandtheclassificationofintegraldimensionsindividualdifferencesintheprocessingofarbitrarydimensions
AT littledanielr logicalrulesandtheclassificationofintegraldimensionsindividualdifferencesintheprocessingofarbitrarydimensions