Cargando…
Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions
A variety of converging operations demonstrate key differences between separable dimensions, which can be analyzed independently, and integral dimensions, which are processed in a non-analytic fashion. A recent investigation of response time distributions, applying a set of logical rule-based models...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4288243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01531 |
_version_ | 1782351938725085184 |
---|---|
author | Blunden, Anthea G. Wang, Tony Griffiths, David W. Little, Daniel R. |
author_facet | Blunden, Anthea G. Wang, Tony Griffiths, David W. Little, Daniel R. |
author_sort | Blunden, Anthea G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A variety of converging operations demonstrate key differences between separable dimensions, which can be analyzed independently, and integral dimensions, which are processed in a non-analytic fashion. A recent investigation of response time distributions, applying a set of logical rule-based models, demonstrated that integral dimensions are pooled into a single coactive processing channel, in contrast to separable dimensions, which are processed in multiple, independent processing channels. This paper examines the claim that arbitrary dimensions created by factorially morphing four faces are processed in an integral manner. In two experiments, 16 participants completed a categorization task in which either upright or inverted morph stimuli were classified in a speeded fashion. Analyses focused on contrasting different assumptions about the psychological representation of the stimuli, perceptual and decisional separability, and the processing architecture. We report consistent individual differences which demonstrate a mixture of some observers who demonstrate coactive processing with other observers who process the dimensions in a parallel self-terminating manner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4288243 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42882432015-01-23 Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions Blunden, Anthea G. Wang, Tony Griffiths, David W. Little, Daniel R. Front Psychol Psychology A variety of converging operations demonstrate key differences between separable dimensions, which can be analyzed independently, and integral dimensions, which are processed in a non-analytic fashion. A recent investigation of response time distributions, applying a set of logical rule-based models, demonstrated that integral dimensions are pooled into a single coactive processing channel, in contrast to separable dimensions, which are processed in multiple, independent processing channels. This paper examines the claim that arbitrary dimensions created by factorially morphing four faces are processed in an integral manner. In two experiments, 16 participants completed a categorization task in which either upright or inverted morph stimuli were classified in a speeded fashion. Analyses focused on contrasting different assumptions about the psychological representation of the stimuli, perceptual and decisional separability, and the processing architecture. We report consistent individual differences which demonstrate a mixture of some observers who demonstrate coactive processing with other observers who process the dimensions in a parallel self-terminating manner. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4288243/ /pubmed/25620941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01531 Text en Copyright © 2015 Blunden, Wang, Griffiths and Little. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Blunden, Anthea G. Wang, Tony Griffiths, David W. Little, Daniel R. Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions |
title | Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions |
title_full | Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions |
title_fullStr | Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions |
title_full_unstemmed | Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions |
title_short | Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions |
title_sort | logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4288243/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01531 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blundenantheag logicalrulesandtheclassificationofintegraldimensionsindividualdifferencesintheprocessingofarbitrarydimensions AT wangtony logicalrulesandtheclassificationofintegraldimensionsindividualdifferencesintheprocessingofarbitrarydimensions AT griffithsdavidw logicalrulesandtheclassificationofintegraldimensionsindividualdifferencesintheprocessingofarbitrarydimensions AT littledanielr logicalrulesandtheclassificationofintegraldimensionsindividualdifferencesintheprocessingofarbitrarydimensions |