Cargando…

Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei

We explore the concept that artists perform best in front of an audience. The negative effects of performance anxiety are much better known than their related cousin on the other shoulder: the positive effects of “social facilitation.” The present study, however, reveals a listener's preference...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shoda, Haruka, Adachi, Mayumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4288287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620948
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01564
_version_ 1782351940833771520
author Shoda, Haruka
Adachi, Mayumi
author_facet Shoda, Haruka
Adachi, Mayumi
author_sort Shoda, Haruka
collection PubMed
description We explore the concept that artists perform best in front of an audience. The negative effects of performance anxiety are much better known than their related cousin on the other shoulder: the positive effects of “social facilitation.” The present study, however, reveals a listener's preference for performances recorded in front of an audience. In Study 1, we prepared two types of recordings of Träumerei performed by 13 pianists: recordings in front of an audience and those with no audience. According to the evaluation by 153 listeners, the recordings performed in front of an audience sounded better, suggesting that the presence of an audience enhanced or facilitated the performance. In Study 2, we analyzed pianists' durational and dynamic expressions. According to the functional principal components analyses, we found that the expression of “Träumerei” consisted of three components: the overall quantity, the cross-sectional contrast between the final and the remaining sections, and the control of the expressive variability. Pianists' expressions were targeted more to the “average” of the cross-sectional variation in the audience-present than in the audience-absent recordings. In Study 3, we explored a model that explained listeners' responses induced by pianists' acoustical expressions, using path analyses. The final model indicated that the cross-sectional variation of the duration and that of the dynamics determined listeners' evaluations of the quality and the emotionally moving experience, respectively. In line with human's preferences for commonality, the more “average” the durational expressions were in live recording, the better the listeners' evaluations were regardless of their musical experiences. Only the well-experienced listeners (at least 16 years of musical training) were moved more by the “deviated” dynamic expressions in live recording, suggesting a link between the experienced listener's emotional experience and the unique dynamics in music.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4288287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42882872015-01-23 Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei Shoda, Haruka Adachi, Mayumi Front Psychol Psychology We explore the concept that artists perform best in front of an audience. The negative effects of performance anxiety are much better known than their related cousin on the other shoulder: the positive effects of “social facilitation.” The present study, however, reveals a listener's preference for performances recorded in front of an audience. In Study 1, we prepared two types of recordings of Träumerei performed by 13 pianists: recordings in front of an audience and those with no audience. According to the evaluation by 153 listeners, the recordings performed in front of an audience sounded better, suggesting that the presence of an audience enhanced or facilitated the performance. In Study 2, we analyzed pianists' durational and dynamic expressions. According to the functional principal components analyses, we found that the expression of “Träumerei” consisted of three components: the overall quantity, the cross-sectional contrast between the final and the remaining sections, and the control of the expressive variability. Pianists' expressions were targeted more to the “average” of the cross-sectional variation in the audience-present than in the audience-absent recordings. In Study 3, we explored a model that explained listeners' responses induced by pianists' acoustical expressions, using path analyses. The final model indicated that the cross-sectional variation of the duration and that of the dynamics determined listeners' evaluations of the quality and the emotionally moving experience, respectively. In line with human's preferences for commonality, the more “average” the durational expressions were in live recording, the better the listeners' evaluations were regardless of their musical experiences. Only the well-experienced listeners (at least 16 years of musical training) were moved more by the “deviated” dynamic expressions in live recording, suggesting a link between the experienced listener's emotional experience and the unique dynamics in music. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4288287/ /pubmed/25620948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01564 Text en Copyright © 2015 Shoda and Adachi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Shoda, Haruka
Adachi, Mayumi
Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei
title Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei
title_full Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei
title_fullStr Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei
title_full_unstemmed Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei
title_short Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei
title_sort why live recording sounds better: a case study of schumann's träumerei
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4288287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620948
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01564
work_keys_str_mv AT shodaharuka whyliverecordingsoundsbetteracasestudyofschumannstraumerei
AT adachimayumi whyliverecordingsoundsbetteracasestudyofschumannstraumerei