Cargando…
Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei
We explore the concept that artists perform best in front of an audience. The negative effects of performance anxiety are much better known than their related cousin on the other shoulder: the positive effects of “social facilitation.” The present study, however, reveals a listener's preference...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4288287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01564 |
_version_ | 1782351940833771520 |
---|---|
author | Shoda, Haruka Adachi, Mayumi |
author_facet | Shoda, Haruka Adachi, Mayumi |
author_sort | Shoda, Haruka |
collection | PubMed |
description | We explore the concept that artists perform best in front of an audience. The negative effects of performance anxiety are much better known than their related cousin on the other shoulder: the positive effects of “social facilitation.” The present study, however, reveals a listener's preference for performances recorded in front of an audience. In Study 1, we prepared two types of recordings of Träumerei performed by 13 pianists: recordings in front of an audience and those with no audience. According to the evaluation by 153 listeners, the recordings performed in front of an audience sounded better, suggesting that the presence of an audience enhanced or facilitated the performance. In Study 2, we analyzed pianists' durational and dynamic expressions. According to the functional principal components analyses, we found that the expression of “Träumerei” consisted of three components: the overall quantity, the cross-sectional contrast between the final and the remaining sections, and the control of the expressive variability. Pianists' expressions were targeted more to the “average” of the cross-sectional variation in the audience-present than in the audience-absent recordings. In Study 3, we explored a model that explained listeners' responses induced by pianists' acoustical expressions, using path analyses. The final model indicated that the cross-sectional variation of the duration and that of the dynamics determined listeners' evaluations of the quality and the emotionally moving experience, respectively. In line with human's preferences for commonality, the more “average” the durational expressions were in live recording, the better the listeners' evaluations were regardless of their musical experiences. Only the well-experienced listeners (at least 16 years of musical training) were moved more by the “deviated” dynamic expressions in live recording, suggesting a link between the experienced listener's emotional experience and the unique dynamics in music. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4288287 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42882872015-01-23 Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei Shoda, Haruka Adachi, Mayumi Front Psychol Psychology We explore the concept that artists perform best in front of an audience. The negative effects of performance anxiety are much better known than their related cousin on the other shoulder: the positive effects of “social facilitation.” The present study, however, reveals a listener's preference for performances recorded in front of an audience. In Study 1, we prepared two types of recordings of Träumerei performed by 13 pianists: recordings in front of an audience and those with no audience. According to the evaluation by 153 listeners, the recordings performed in front of an audience sounded better, suggesting that the presence of an audience enhanced or facilitated the performance. In Study 2, we analyzed pianists' durational and dynamic expressions. According to the functional principal components analyses, we found that the expression of “Träumerei” consisted of three components: the overall quantity, the cross-sectional contrast between the final and the remaining sections, and the control of the expressive variability. Pianists' expressions were targeted more to the “average” of the cross-sectional variation in the audience-present than in the audience-absent recordings. In Study 3, we explored a model that explained listeners' responses induced by pianists' acoustical expressions, using path analyses. The final model indicated that the cross-sectional variation of the duration and that of the dynamics determined listeners' evaluations of the quality and the emotionally moving experience, respectively. In line with human's preferences for commonality, the more “average” the durational expressions were in live recording, the better the listeners' evaluations were regardless of their musical experiences. Only the well-experienced listeners (at least 16 years of musical training) were moved more by the “deviated” dynamic expressions in live recording, suggesting a link between the experienced listener's emotional experience and the unique dynamics in music. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4288287/ /pubmed/25620948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01564 Text en Copyright © 2015 Shoda and Adachi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Shoda, Haruka Adachi, Mayumi Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei |
title | Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei |
title_full | Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei |
title_fullStr | Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei |
title_full_unstemmed | Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei |
title_short | Why live recording sounds better: a case study of Schumann's Träumerei |
title_sort | why live recording sounds better: a case study of schumann's träumerei |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4288287/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620948 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shodaharuka whyliverecordingsoundsbetteracasestudyofschumannstraumerei AT adachimayumi whyliverecordingsoundsbetteracasestudyofschumannstraumerei |