Cargando…
A review and re-interpretation of a group-sequential approach to sample size re-estimation in two-stage trials
In this paper, we review the adaptive design methodology of Li et al. (Biostatistics 3:277–287) for two-stage trials with mid-trial sample size adjustment. We argue that it is closer in principle to a group sequential design, in spite of its obvious adaptive element. Several extensions are proposed...
Autores principales: | Bowden, J, Mander, A |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4288989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24692348 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pst.1613 |
Ejemplares similares
-
An optimal stratified Simon two‐stage design
por: Parashar, Deepak, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Adaptive two-stage bioequivalence trials with early stopping and sample size re-estimation
por: Koenig, Franz, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Sample size re-estimation in crossover trials: application to the AIM HY-INFORM study
por: Wych, Julie, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Interim sample size re-estimation in the IIVOP trial
por: Dawson, Sarah, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
(Re)shaping Amazon labour struggles on both sides of the Atlantic: the power
dynamics in Germany and the US amidst the pandemic
por: Kassem, Sarrah
Publicado: (2023)