Cargando…

A comparison of mandibular and maxillary alveolar osteogenesis over six weeks: a radiological examination

INTRODUCTION: Insufficient information exists on comparing radiological differences in bone density of the regeneration rate in the alveolar bone of the maxilla and mandible following the creation of similar defects in both. METHODS: Alveolar bone defects were created from five healthy Chacma baboon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kotze, Marthinus J, Bütow, Kurt-W, Olorunju, Steve A, Kotze, Harry F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25429901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-50
_version_ 1782352058470367232
author Kotze, Marthinus J
Bütow, Kurt-W
Olorunju, Steve A
Kotze, Harry F
author_facet Kotze, Marthinus J
Bütow, Kurt-W
Olorunju, Steve A
Kotze, Harry F
author_sort Kotze, Marthinus J
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Insufficient information exists on comparing radiological differences in bone density of the regeneration rate in the alveolar bone of the maxilla and mandible following the creation of similar defects in both. METHODS: Alveolar bone defects were created from five healthy Chacma baboons. Standardized x-ray images were acquired over time and the densities of the selected defect areas were measured pre-operatively, directly post-operatively and at three- and six weeks post-operatively. Differences in densities were statistically tested using ANOVA. RESULTS: The maxilla was significantly more radiologically dense (p = 0.026) than the mandible pre- operatively. No differences were obtained between the maxilla and mandible directly postoperatively and three- and six weeks post-operatively respectively; i.e. densities were not significantly different at the different time points after the defects had been created (three weeks: t = 1.08, p = 0.30; six weeks: t = 1.35, p = 0.19; three to six weeks: t = 1.20, p =0.25). The increase in density in the mandible was 106% (8.9 ± 7.6%/time versus 4.3 ± 2.7%/time) over three weeks, 28% (15.0 ± 8.1%/time versus 11.7 ± 8.0%/time) over six weeks and 56% (12.5 ± 9.7%/time versus 8.0 ± 6.9%/time) over three-to-six weeks and was higher than in the maxilla over the same intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Radiological examination with its standardized gray-scale analysis can be used to determine the difference in bone density of the maxilla and mandible. Although not statistically significant, the mandible healed at a faster rate than the maxilla, especially observed during the first three weeks after the defects were created.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4289173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42891732015-01-11 A comparison of mandibular and maxillary alveolar osteogenesis over six weeks: a radiological examination Kotze, Marthinus J Bütow, Kurt-W Olorunju, Steve A Kotze, Harry F Head Face Med Research INTRODUCTION: Insufficient information exists on comparing radiological differences in bone density of the regeneration rate in the alveolar bone of the maxilla and mandible following the creation of similar defects in both. METHODS: Alveolar bone defects were created from five healthy Chacma baboons. Standardized x-ray images were acquired over time and the densities of the selected defect areas were measured pre-operatively, directly post-operatively and at three- and six weeks post-operatively. Differences in densities were statistically tested using ANOVA. RESULTS: The maxilla was significantly more radiologically dense (p = 0.026) than the mandible pre- operatively. No differences were obtained between the maxilla and mandible directly postoperatively and three- and six weeks post-operatively respectively; i.e. densities were not significantly different at the different time points after the defects had been created (three weeks: t = 1.08, p = 0.30; six weeks: t = 1.35, p = 0.19; three to six weeks: t = 1.20, p =0.25). The increase in density in the mandible was 106% (8.9 ± 7.6%/time versus 4.3 ± 2.7%/time) over three weeks, 28% (15.0 ± 8.1%/time versus 11.7 ± 8.0%/time) over six weeks and 56% (12.5 ± 9.7%/time versus 8.0 ± 6.9%/time) over three-to-six weeks and was higher than in the maxilla over the same intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Radiological examination with its standardized gray-scale analysis can be used to determine the difference in bone density of the maxilla and mandible. Although not statistically significant, the mandible healed at a faster rate than the maxilla, especially observed during the first three weeks after the defects were created. BioMed Central 2014-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4289173/ /pubmed/25429901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-50 Text en © Kotze et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kotze, Marthinus J
Bütow, Kurt-W
Olorunju, Steve A
Kotze, Harry F
A comparison of mandibular and maxillary alveolar osteogenesis over six weeks: a radiological examination
title A comparison of mandibular and maxillary alveolar osteogenesis over six weeks: a radiological examination
title_full A comparison of mandibular and maxillary alveolar osteogenesis over six weeks: a radiological examination
title_fullStr A comparison of mandibular and maxillary alveolar osteogenesis over six weeks: a radiological examination
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of mandibular and maxillary alveolar osteogenesis over six weeks: a radiological examination
title_short A comparison of mandibular and maxillary alveolar osteogenesis over six weeks: a radiological examination
title_sort comparison of mandibular and maxillary alveolar osteogenesis over six weeks: a radiological examination
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25429901
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-50
work_keys_str_mv AT kotzemarthinusj acomparisonofmandibularandmaxillaryalveolarosteogenesisoversixweeksaradiologicalexamination
AT butowkurtw acomparisonofmandibularandmaxillaryalveolarosteogenesisoversixweeksaradiologicalexamination
AT olorunjustevea acomparisonofmandibularandmaxillaryalveolarosteogenesisoversixweeksaradiologicalexamination
AT kotzeharryf acomparisonofmandibularandmaxillaryalveolarosteogenesisoversixweeksaradiologicalexamination
AT kotzemarthinusj comparisonofmandibularandmaxillaryalveolarosteogenesisoversixweeksaradiologicalexamination
AT butowkurtw comparisonofmandibularandmaxillaryalveolarosteogenesisoversixweeksaradiologicalexamination
AT olorunjustevea comparisonofmandibularandmaxillaryalveolarosteogenesisoversixweeksaradiologicalexamination
AT kotzeharryf comparisonofmandibularandmaxillaryalveolarosteogenesisoversixweeksaradiologicalexamination