Cargando…

Transversus abdominis plane block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Despite the laparoscopic approach becoming the standard in colorectal surgery, postoperative pain management for minimally invasive surgery is still mainly based on strategies that have been established for open surgical procedures. Patient-controlled epidural and intravenous analgesia a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dewinter, Geertrui, de Velde, Marc Van, Fieuws, Steffen, D’Hoore, Andre, Rex, Steffen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25472808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-476
_version_ 1782352066949152768
author Dewinter, Geertrui
de Velde, Marc Van
Fieuws, Steffen
D’Hoore, Andre
Rex, Steffen
author_facet Dewinter, Geertrui
de Velde, Marc Van
Fieuws, Steffen
D’Hoore, Andre
Rex, Steffen
author_sort Dewinter, Geertrui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the laparoscopic approach becoming the standard in colorectal surgery, postoperative pain management for minimally invasive surgery is still mainly based on strategies that have been established for open surgical procedures. Patient-controlled epidural and intravenous analgesia are considered standard postoperative analgesia regimens in colorectal surgery. Epidural analgesia provides excellent analgesia, but is increasingly scrutinized in laparoscopic surgery since postoperative pain after the laparoscopic approach is significantly reduced. Moreover, epidural analgesia can be associated with numerous complications. Therefore, epidural analgesia is no longer recommended for the management of postoperative pain in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Likewise, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia is subject to significant side effects. Given these important limitations of the traditional strategies for postoperative analgesia, effective and efficient alternatives in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery are needed. Both the transversus abdominis plane block and systemically administered lidocaine have already been reported to effectively reduce pain after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. We hypothesize that the transversus abdominis plane block is superior to perioperative intravenous lidocaine. METHODS/DESIGN: One hundred and twenty five patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery will be included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to three different postoperative strategies: postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine (control group, n = 25), a transversus abdominis plane block with ropivacaine 0.375% at the end of surgery plus postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine (TAP group, n = 50), or perioperative intravenous lidocaine plus postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine (LIDO group, n = 50). As the primary outcome parameter, we will evaluate the opioid consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary endpoints include the Numeric Rating Scale, time to return of intestinal function, time to mobilization, inflammatory response, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of hospital stay and postoperative morbidity as assessed with the Clavien-Dindo classification. DISCUSSION: Recognizing the importance of a multimodal approach for perioperative pain management, we aim to investigate whether a transversus abdominis plane block delivers superior pain control in comparison to perioperative intravenous lidocaine and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Identifier: 2014-001499-73; 31 July 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4289212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42892122015-01-11 Transversus abdominis plane block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial Dewinter, Geertrui de Velde, Marc Van Fieuws, Steffen D’Hoore, Andre Rex, Steffen Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Despite the laparoscopic approach becoming the standard in colorectal surgery, postoperative pain management for minimally invasive surgery is still mainly based on strategies that have been established for open surgical procedures. Patient-controlled epidural and intravenous analgesia are considered standard postoperative analgesia regimens in colorectal surgery. Epidural analgesia provides excellent analgesia, but is increasingly scrutinized in laparoscopic surgery since postoperative pain after the laparoscopic approach is significantly reduced. Moreover, epidural analgesia can be associated with numerous complications. Therefore, epidural analgesia is no longer recommended for the management of postoperative pain in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Likewise, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia is subject to significant side effects. Given these important limitations of the traditional strategies for postoperative analgesia, effective and efficient alternatives in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery are needed. Both the transversus abdominis plane block and systemically administered lidocaine have already been reported to effectively reduce pain after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. We hypothesize that the transversus abdominis plane block is superior to perioperative intravenous lidocaine. METHODS/DESIGN: One hundred and twenty five patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery will be included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial. Patients will be randomly allocated to three different postoperative strategies: postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine (control group, n = 25), a transversus abdominis plane block with ropivacaine 0.375% at the end of surgery plus postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine (TAP group, n = 50), or perioperative intravenous lidocaine plus postoperative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine (LIDO group, n = 50). As the primary outcome parameter, we will evaluate the opioid consumption during the first 24 postoperative hours. Secondary endpoints include the Numeric Rating Scale, time to return of intestinal function, time to mobilization, inflammatory response, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of hospital stay and postoperative morbidity as assessed with the Clavien-Dindo classification. DISCUSSION: Recognizing the importance of a multimodal approach for perioperative pain management, we aim to investigate whether a transversus abdominis plane block delivers superior pain control in comparison to perioperative intravenous lidocaine and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with morphine alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Identifier: 2014-001499-73; 31 July 2014. BioMed Central 2014-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4289212/ /pubmed/25472808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-476 Text en © Dewinter et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Dewinter, Geertrui
de Velde, Marc Van
Fieuws, Steffen
D’Hoore, Andre
Rex, Steffen
Transversus abdominis plane block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
title Transversus abdominis plane block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
title_full Transversus abdominis plane block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Transversus abdominis plane block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Transversus abdominis plane block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
title_short Transversus abdominis plane block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
title_sort transversus abdominis plane block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25472808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-476
work_keys_str_mv AT dewintergeertrui transversusabdominisplaneblockversusperioperativeintravenouslidocaineversuspatientcontrolledintravenousmorphineforpostoperativepaincontrolafterlaparoscopiccolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT develdemarcvan transversusabdominisplaneblockversusperioperativeintravenouslidocaineversuspatientcontrolledintravenousmorphineforpostoperativepaincontrolafterlaparoscopiccolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT fieuwssteffen transversusabdominisplaneblockversusperioperativeintravenouslidocaineversuspatientcontrolledintravenousmorphineforpostoperativepaincontrolafterlaparoscopiccolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT dhooreandre transversusabdominisplaneblockversusperioperativeintravenouslidocaineversuspatientcontrolledintravenousmorphineforpostoperativepaincontrolafterlaparoscopiccolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT rexsteffen transversusabdominisplaneblockversusperioperativeintravenouslidocaineversuspatientcontrolledintravenousmorphineforpostoperativepaincontrolafterlaparoscopiccolorectalsurgerystudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizeddoubleblindcontrolledclinicaltrial