Cargando…

Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome

BACKGROUND: Chromatin compactness has been considered a major determinant of gene activity and has been associated with specific chromatin modifications in studies on a few individual genetic loci. At the same time, genome-wide patterns of open and closed chromatin have been understudied, and are at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milon, Beatrice, Sun, Yezhou, Chang, Weizhong, Creasy, Todd, Mahurkar, Anup, Shetty, Amol, Nurminsky, Dmitry, Nurminskaya, Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-988
_version_ 1782352076863438848
author Milon, Beatrice
Sun, Yezhou
Chang, Weizhong
Creasy, Todd
Mahurkar, Anup
Shetty, Amol
Nurminsky, Dmitry
Nurminskaya, Maria
author_facet Milon, Beatrice
Sun, Yezhou
Chang, Weizhong
Creasy, Todd
Mahurkar, Anup
Shetty, Amol
Nurminsky, Dmitry
Nurminskaya, Maria
author_sort Milon, Beatrice
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chromatin compactness has been considered a major determinant of gene activity and has been associated with specific chromatin modifications in studies on a few individual genetic loci. At the same time, genome-wide patterns of open and closed chromatin have been understudied, and are at present largely predicted from chromatin modification and gene expression data. However the universal applicability of such predictions is not self-evident, and requires experimental verification. RESULTS: We developed and implemented a high-throughput analysis for general chromatin sensitivity to DNase I which provides a comprehensive epigenomic assessment in a single assay. Contiguous domains of open and closed chromatin were identified by computational analysis of the data, and correlated to other genome annotations including predicted chromatin “states”, individual chromatin modifications, nuclear lamina interactions, and gene expression. While showing that the widely trusted predictions of chromatin structure are correct in the majority of cases, we detected diverse “exceptions” from the conventional rules. We found a profound paucity of chromatin modifications in a major fraction of closed chromatin, and identified a number of loci where chromatin configuration is opposite to that expected from modification and gene expression patterns. Further, we observed that chromatin of large introns tends to be closed even when the genes are expressed, and that a significant proportion of active genes including their promoters are located in closed chromatin. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal limitations of the existing predictive models, indicate novel mechanisms of epigenetic regulation, and provide important insights into genome organization and function. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-988) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4289254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42892542015-01-11 Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome Milon, Beatrice Sun, Yezhou Chang, Weizhong Creasy, Todd Mahurkar, Anup Shetty, Amol Nurminsky, Dmitry Nurminskaya, Maria BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Chromatin compactness has been considered a major determinant of gene activity and has been associated with specific chromatin modifications in studies on a few individual genetic loci. At the same time, genome-wide patterns of open and closed chromatin have been understudied, and are at present largely predicted from chromatin modification and gene expression data. However the universal applicability of such predictions is not self-evident, and requires experimental verification. RESULTS: We developed and implemented a high-throughput analysis for general chromatin sensitivity to DNase I which provides a comprehensive epigenomic assessment in a single assay. Contiguous domains of open and closed chromatin were identified by computational analysis of the data, and correlated to other genome annotations including predicted chromatin “states”, individual chromatin modifications, nuclear lamina interactions, and gene expression. While showing that the widely trusted predictions of chromatin structure are correct in the majority of cases, we detected diverse “exceptions” from the conventional rules. We found a profound paucity of chromatin modifications in a major fraction of closed chromatin, and identified a number of loci where chromatin configuration is opposite to that expected from modification and gene expression patterns. Further, we observed that chromatin of large introns tends to be closed even when the genes are expressed, and that a significant proportion of active genes including their promoters are located in closed chromatin. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal limitations of the existing predictive models, indicate novel mechanisms of epigenetic regulation, and provide important insights into genome organization and function. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-988) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4289254/ /pubmed/25407537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-988 Text en © Milon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Milon, Beatrice
Sun, Yezhou
Chang, Weizhong
Creasy, Todd
Mahurkar, Anup
Shetty, Amol
Nurminsky, Dmitry
Nurminskaya, Maria
Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome
title Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome
title_full Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome
title_fullStr Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome
title_full_unstemmed Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome
title_short Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome
title_sort map of open and closed chromatin domains in drosophila genome
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-988
work_keys_str_mv AT milonbeatrice mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome
AT sunyezhou mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome
AT changweizhong mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome
AT creasytodd mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome
AT mahurkaranup mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome
AT shettyamol mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome
AT nurminskydmitry mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome
AT nurminskayamaria mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome