Cargando…
Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome
BACKGROUND: Chromatin compactness has been considered a major determinant of gene activity and has been associated with specific chromatin modifications in studies on a few individual genetic loci. At the same time, genome-wide patterns of open and closed chromatin have been understudied, and are at...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-988 |
_version_ | 1782352076863438848 |
---|---|
author | Milon, Beatrice Sun, Yezhou Chang, Weizhong Creasy, Todd Mahurkar, Anup Shetty, Amol Nurminsky, Dmitry Nurminskaya, Maria |
author_facet | Milon, Beatrice Sun, Yezhou Chang, Weizhong Creasy, Todd Mahurkar, Anup Shetty, Amol Nurminsky, Dmitry Nurminskaya, Maria |
author_sort | Milon, Beatrice |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chromatin compactness has been considered a major determinant of gene activity and has been associated with specific chromatin modifications in studies on a few individual genetic loci. At the same time, genome-wide patterns of open and closed chromatin have been understudied, and are at present largely predicted from chromatin modification and gene expression data. However the universal applicability of such predictions is not self-evident, and requires experimental verification. RESULTS: We developed and implemented a high-throughput analysis for general chromatin sensitivity to DNase I which provides a comprehensive epigenomic assessment in a single assay. Contiguous domains of open and closed chromatin were identified by computational analysis of the data, and correlated to other genome annotations including predicted chromatin “states”, individual chromatin modifications, nuclear lamina interactions, and gene expression. While showing that the widely trusted predictions of chromatin structure are correct in the majority of cases, we detected diverse “exceptions” from the conventional rules. We found a profound paucity of chromatin modifications in a major fraction of closed chromatin, and identified a number of loci where chromatin configuration is opposite to that expected from modification and gene expression patterns. Further, we observed that chromatin of large introns tends to be closed even when the genes are expressed, and that a significant proportion of active genes including their promoters are located in closed chromatin. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal limitations of the existing predictive models, indicate novel mechanisms of epigenetic regulation, and provide important insights into genome organization and function. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-988) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4289254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42892542015-01-11 Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome Milon, Beatrice Sun, Yezhou Chang, Weizhong Creasy, Todd Mahurkar, Anup Shetty, Amol Nurminsky, Dmitry Nurminskaya, Maria BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Chromatin compactness has been considered a major determinant of gene activity and has been associated with specific chromatin modifications in studies on a few individual genetic loci. At the same time, genome-wide patterns of open and closed chromatin have been understudied, and are at present largely predicted from chromatin modification and gene expression data. However the universal applicability of such predictions is not self-evident, and requires experimental verification. RESULTS: We developed and implemented a high-throughput analysis for general chromatin sensitivity to DNase I which provides a comprehensive epigenomic assessment in a single assay. Contiguous domains of open and closed chromatin were identified by computational analysis of the data, and correlated to other genome annotations including predicted chromatin “states”, individual chromatin modifications, nuclear lamina interactions, and gene expression. While showing that the widely trusted predictions of chromatin structure are correct in the majority of cases, we detected diverse “exceptions” from the conventional rules. We found a profound paucity of chromatin modifications in a major fraction of closed chromatin, and identified a number of loci where chromatin configuration is opposite to that expected from modification and gene expression patterns. Further, we observed that chromatin of large introns tends to be closed even when the genes are expressed, and that a significant proportion of active genes including their promoters are located in closed chromatin. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal limitations of the existing predictive models, indicate novel mechanisms of epigenetic regulation, and provide important insights into genome organization and function. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-15-988) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4289254/ /pubmed/25407537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-988 Text en © Milon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Milon, Beatrice Sun, Yezhou Chang, Weizhong Creasy, Todd Mahurkar, Anup Shetty, Amol Nurminsky, Dmitry Nurminskaya, Maria Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome |
title | Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome |
title_full | Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome |
title_fullStr | Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome |
title_full_unstemmed | Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome |
title_short | Map of open and closed chromatin domains in Drosophila genome |
title_sort | map of open and closed chromatin domains in drosophila genome |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-988 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milonbeatrice mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome AT sunyezhou mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome AT changweizhong mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome AT creasytodd mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome AT mahurkaranup mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome AT shettyamol mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome AT nurminskydmitry mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome AT nurminskayamaria mapofopenandclosedchromatindomainsindrosophilagenome |