Cargando…

Comparison of posterior foraminotomy and anterior foraminotomy with fusion for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ForaC)

BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy caused by spondylotic foraminal stenosis may require surgical treatment. Surgical options include anterior cervical foraminotomy and fusion or posterior cervical foraminotomy. Controversy remains regarding the preferable surgical approach. Pertinent clinical eviden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tschugg, Anja, Neururer, Sabrina, Scheufler, Kai Michael, Ulmer, Hanno, Thomé, Claudius, Hegewald, Aldemar Andres
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25381593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-437
_version_ 1782352105191768064
author Tschugg, Anja
Neururer, Sabrina
Scheufler, Kai Michael
Ulmer, Hanno
Thomé, Claudius
Hegewald, Aldemar Andres
author_facet Tschugg, Anja
Neururer, Sabrina
Scheufler, Kai Michael
Ulmer, Hanno
Thomé, Claudius
Hegewald, Aldemar Andres
author_sort Tschugg, Anja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy caused by spondylotic foraminal stenosis may require surgical treatment. Surgical options include anterior cervical foraminotomy and fusion or posterior cervical foraminotomy. Controversy remains regarding the preferable surgical approach. Pertinent clinical evidence is limited to low-quality observational reports. Therefore, treatment decisions are predominantly based on the individual surgeon’s preference and skill. The study objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of posterior foraminotomy in comparison to anterior foraminotomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic foraminal stenosis. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter randomized, controlled, parallel group superiority trial. A total of 88 adult patients are allocated in a ratio of 1:1. Sample size and power calculations were performed to detect the minimal clinically important difference of 14 points, with an expected standard deviation of 20 in the primary outcome parameter, Neck Disability Index, with a power of 80%, based on an assumed maximal dropout rate of 20%. Secondary outcome parameters include the Core Outcome Measures Index, which investigates pain, back-specific function, work disability, social disability and patient satisfaction. Changes in physical and mental health are evaluated using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire. Moreover, radiological and health economic outcomes are evaluated. Follow-up is performed 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after surgery. Major inclusion criteria are cervical spondylotic foraminal stenosis causing radiculopathy of C5, C6 or C7 and requiring decompression of one or two neuroforaminae. Study data generation (study sites) and data storage, processing and statistical analysis (Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics) are clearly separated. Data will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: The results of the ForaC study will provide surgical treatment recommendations for spondylotic foraminal stenosis and will contribute to the understanding of its short- and long-term clinical and radiological postoperative course. This will hopefully translate into improvements in surgical treatment and thus, clinical practice for spondylotic foraminal stenosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN82578069. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-437) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4289374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42893742015-01-11 Comparison of posterior foraminotomy and anterior foraminotomy with fusion for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ForaC) Tschugg, Anja Neururer, Sabrina Scheufler, Kai Michael Ulmer, Hanno Thomé, Claudius Hegewald, Aldemar Andres Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy caused by spondylotic foraminal stenosis may require surgical treatment. Surgical options include anterior cervical foraminotomy and fusion or posterior cervical foraminotomy. Controversy remains regarding the preferable surgical approach. Pertinent clinical evidence is limited to low-quality observational reports. Therefore, treatment decisions are predominantly based on the individual surgeon’s preference and skill. The study objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of posterior foraminotomy in comparison to anterior foraminotomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic foraminal stenosis. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multicenter randomized, controlled, parallel group superiority trial. A total of 88 adult patients are allocated in a ratio of 1:1. Sample size and power calculations were performed to detect the minimal clinically important difference of 14 points, with an expected standard deviation of 20 in the primary outcome parameter, Neck Disability Index, with a power of 80%, based on an assumed maximal dropout rate of 20%. Secondary outcome parameters include the Core Outcome Measures Index, which investigates pain, back-specific function, work disability, social disability and patient satisfaction. Changes in physical and mental health are evaluated using the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire. Moreover, radiological and health economic outcomes are evaluated. Follow-up is performed 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after surgery. Major inclusion criteria are cervical spondylotic foraminal stenosis causing radiculopathy of C5, C6 or C7 and requiring decompression of one or two neuroforaminae. Study data generation (study sites) and data storage, processing and statistical analysis (Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Health Economics) are clearly separated. Data will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. DISCUSSION: The results of the ForaC study will provide surgical treatment recommendations for spondylotic foraminal stenosis and will contribute to the understanding of its short- and long-term clinical and radiological postoperative course. This will hopefully translate into improvements in surgical treatment and thus, clinical practice for spondylotic foraminal stenosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials: ISRCTN82578069. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-437) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4289374/ /pubmed/25381593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-437 Text en © Tschugg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Tschugg, Anja
Neururer, Sabrina
Scheufler, Kai Michael
Ulmer, Hanno
Thomé, Claudius
Hegewald, Aldemar Andres
Comparison of posterior foraminotomy and anterior foraminotomy with fusion for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ForaC)
title Comparison of posterior foraminotomy and anterior foraminotomy with fusion for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ForaC)
title_full Comparison of posterior foraminotomy and anterior foraminotomy with fusion for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ForaC)
title_fullStr Comparison of posterior foraminotomy and anterior foraminotomy with fusion for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ForaC)
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of posterior foraminotomy and anterior foraminotomy with fusion for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ForaC)
title_short Comparison of posterior foraminotomy and anterior foraminotomy with fusion for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (ForaC)
title_sort comparison of posterior foraminotomy and anterior foraminotomy with fusion for treating spondylotic foraminal stenosis of the cervical spine: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (forac)
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25381593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-437
work_keys_str_mv AT tschugganja comparisonofposteriorforaminotomyandanteriorforaminotomywithfusionfortreatingspondyloticforaminalstenosisofthecervicalspinestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforac
AT neururersabrina comparisonofposteriorforaminotomyandanteriorforaminotomywithfusionfortreatingspondyloticforaminalstenosisofthecervicalspinestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforac
AT scheuflerkaimichael comparisonofposteriorforaminotomyandanteriorforaminotomywithfusionfortreatingspondyloticforaminalstenosisofthecervicalspinestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforac
AT ulmerhanno comparisonofposteriorforaminotomyandanteriorforaminotomywithfusionfortreatingspondyloticforaminalstenosisofthecervicalspinestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforac
AT thomeclaudius comparisonofposteriorforaminotomyandanteriorforaminotomywithfusionfortreatingspondyloticforaminalstenosisofthecervicalspinestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforac
AT hegewaldaldemarandres comparisonofposteriorforaminotomyandanteriorforaminotomywithfusionfortreatingspondyloticforaminalstenosisofthecervicalspinestudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialforac