Cargando…
Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different retainer wires and three different bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process of enamel surface sandblasting. METHODS: 400 extracted bovine incisors were divided into 10 groups of 20 paired specime...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25429986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-51 |
_version_ | 1782352109220397056 |
---|---|
author | Reicheneder, Claudia Hofrichter, Bernd Faltermeier, Andreas Proff, Peter Lippold, Carsten Kirschneck, Christian |
author_facet | Reicheneder, Claudia Hofrichter, Bernd Faltermeier, Andreas Proff, Peter Lippold, Carsten Kirschneck, Christian |
author_sort | Reicheneder, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different retainer wires and three different bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process of enamel surface sandblasting. METHODS: 400 extracted bovine incisors were divided into 10 groups of 20 paired specimens each. 10 specimens of each group were pretreated by enamel sandblasting. The retainer wires Bond-A-Braid™, GAC-Wildcat®-Twistflex and everStick®ORTHO were bonded to the teeth with the adhesives Transbond™-LR, Tetric-EvoFlow™ and Stick®FLOW and then debonded measuring the SBS. RESULTS: While sandblasting generally increased SBS for all tested combinations, the retainer wires bonded with Transbond™-LR showed the highest SBS both with and without prior sandblasting. Significantly lower SBS were found for Tetric-EvoFlow™ that were comparable to those for everStick®ORTHO. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment of enamel surfaces by sandblasting increased the SBS of all retainer-wires. Transbond™-LR showed the best results compared to Tetric-EvoFlow™ and everStick®ORTHO, while all combinations used provided sufficient bonding strengths for clinical use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4289392 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42893922015-01-11 Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process Reicheneder, Claudia Hofrichter, Bernd Faltermeier, Andreas Proff, Peter Lippold, Carsten Kirschneck, Christian Head Face Med Research INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different retainer wires and three different bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process of enamel surface sandblasting. METHODS: 400 extracted bovine incisors were divided into 10 groups of 20 paired specimens each. 10 specimens of each group were pretreated by enamel sandblasting. The retainer wires Bond-A-Braid™, GAC-Wildcat®-Twistflex and everStick®ORTHO were bonded to the teeth with the adhesives Transbond™-LR, Tetric-EvoFlow™ and Stick®FLOW and then debonded measuring the SBS. RESULTS: While sandblasting generally increased SBS for all tested combinations, the retainer wires bonded with Transbond™-LR showed the highest SBS both with and without prior sandblasting. Significantly lower SBS were found for Tetric-EvoFlow™ that were comparable to those for everStick®ORTHO. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment of enamel surfaces by sandblasting increased the SBS of all retainer-wires. Transbond™-LR showed the best results compared to Tetric-EvoFlow™ and everStick®ORTHO, while all combinations used provided sufficient bonding strengths for clinical use. BioMed Central 2014-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4289392/ /pubmed/25429986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-51 Text en © Reicheneder et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Reicheneder, Claudia Hofrichter, Bernd Faltermeier, Andreas Proff, Peter Lippold, Carsten Kirschneck, Christian Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process |
title | Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process |
title_full | Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process |
title_fullStr | Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process |
title_full_unstemmed | Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process |
title_short | Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process |
title_sort | shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289392/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25429986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-51 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reichenederclaudia shearbondstrengthofdifferentretainerwiresandbondingadhesivesinconsiderationofthepretreatmentprocess AT hofrichterbernd shearbondstrengthofdifferentretainerwiresandbondingadhesivesinconsiderationofthepretreatmentprocess AT faltermeierandreas shearbondstrengthofdifferentretainerwiresandbondingadhesivesinconsiderationofthepretreatmentprocess AT proffpeter shearbondstrengthofdifferentretainerwiresandbondingadhesivesinconsiderationofthepretreatmentprocess AT lippoldcarsten shearbondstrengthofdifferentretainerwiresandbondingadhesivesinconsiderationofthepretreatmentprocess AT kirschneckchristian shearbondstrengthofdifferentretainerwiresandbondingadhesivesinconsiderationofthepretreatmentprocess |