Cargando…

Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different retainer wires and three different bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process of enamel surface sandblasting. METHODS: 400 extracted bovine incisors were divided into 10 groups of 20 paired specime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reicheneder, Claudia, Hofrichter, Bernd, Faltermeier, Andreas, Proff, Peter, Lippold, Carsten, Kirschneck, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25429986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-51
_version_ 1782352109220397056
author Reicheneder, Claudia
Hofrichter, Bernd
Faltermeier, Andreas
Proff, Peter
Lippold, Carsten
Kirschneck, Christian
author_facet Reicheneder, Claudia
Hofrichter, Bernd
Faltermeier, Andreas
Proff, Peter
Lippold, Carsten
Kirschneck, Christian
author_sort Reicheneder, Claudia
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different retainer wires and three different bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process of enamel surface sandblasting. METHODS: 400 extracted bovine incisors were divided into 10 groups of 20 paired specimens each. 10 specimens of each group were pretreated by enamel sandblasting. The retainer wires Bond-A-Braid™, GAC-Wildcat®-Twistflex and everStick®ORTHO were bonded to the teeth with the adhesives Transbond™-LR, Tetric-EvoFlow™ and Stick®FLOW and then debonded measuring the SBS. RESULTS: While sandblasting generally increased SBS for all tested combinations, the retainer wires bonded with Transbond™-LR showed the highest SBS both with and without prior sandblasting. Significantly lower SBS were found for Tetric-EvoFlow™ that were comparable to those for everStick®ORTHO. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment of enamel surfaces by sandblasting increased the SBS of all retainer-wires. Transbond™-LR showed the best results compared to Tetric-EvoFlow™ and everStick®ORTHO, while all combinations used provided sufficient bonding strengths for clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4289392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42893922015-01-11 Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process Reicheneder, Claudia Hofrichter, Bernd Faltermeier, Andreas Proff, Peter Lippold, Carsten Kirschneck, Christian Head Face Med Research INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different retainer wires and three different bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process of enamel surface sandblasting. METHODS: 400 extracted bovine incisors were divided into 10 groups of 20 paired specimens each. 10 specimens of each group were pretreated by enamel sandblasting. The retainer wires Bond-A-Braid™, GAC-Wildcat®-Twistflex and everStick®ORTHO were bonded to the teeth with the adhesives Transbond™-LR, Tetric-EvoFlow™ and Stick®FLOW and then debonded measuring the SBS. RESULTS: While sandblasting generally increased SBS for all tested combinations, the retainer wires bonded with Transbond™-LR showed the highest SBS both with and without prior sandblasting. Significantly lower SBS were found for Tetric-EvoFlow™ that were comparable to those for everStick®ORTHO. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment of enamel surfaces by sandblasting increased the SBS of all retainer-wires. Transbond™-LR showed the best results compared to Tetric-EvoFlow™ and everStick®ORTHO, while all combinations used provided sufficient bonding strengths for clinical use. BioMed Central 2014-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4289392/ /pubmed/25429986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-51 Text en © Reicheneder et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Reicheneder, Claudia
Hofrichter, Bernd
Faltermeier, Andreas
Proff, Peter
Lippold, Carsten
Kirschneck, Christian
Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process
title Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process
title_full Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process
title_fullStr Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process
title_full_unstemmed Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process
title_short Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process
title_sort shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25429986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-51
work_keys_str_mv AT reichenederclaudia shearbondstrengthofdifferentretainerwiresandbondingadhesivesinconsiderationofthepretreatmentprocess
AT hofrichterbernd shearbondstrengthofdifferentretainerwiresandbondingadhesivesinconsiderationofthepretreatmentprocess
AT faltermeierandreas shearbondstrengthofdifferentretainerwiresandbondingadhesivesinconsiderationofthepretreatmentprocess
AT proffpeter shearbondstrengthofdifferentretainerwiresandbondingadhesivesinconsiderationofthepretreatmentprocess
AT lippoldcarsten shearbondstrengthofdifferentretainerwiresandbondingadhesivesinconsiderationofthepretreatmentprocess
AT kirschneckchristian shearbondstrengthofdifferentretainerwiresandbondingadhesivesinconsiderationofthepretreatmentprocess