Cargando…

Screening and treatment for Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of surveillance for screening and treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis and colonized by Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. The literature search...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grothe, Cibele, Taminato, Mônica, Belasco, Angélica, Sesso, Ricardo, Barbosa, Dulce
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25519998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-15-202
_version_ 1782352135289044992
author Grothe, Cibele
Taminato, Mônica
Belasco, Angélica
Sesso, Ricardo
Barbosa, Dulce
author_facet Grothe, Cibele
Taminato, Mônica
Belasco, Angélica
Sesso, Ricardo
Barbosa, Dulce
author_sort Grothe, Cibele
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of surveillance for screening and treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis and colonized by Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. The literature search involved the following databases: the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Embase, LILACS, CINAHL, SciELO, and PubMed/Medline. The descriptors were “Staphylococcus aureus”, “MRSA”, “MSSA”, “treatment”, “decolonization”, “nasal carrier”, “colonization”, “chronic kidney disease”, “dialysis”, and “haemodialysis” or “hemodialysis”. Five randomized controlled trials that exhibited agreement among reviewers as shown by a kappa value of >0.80 were included in the study; methodological quality was evaluated using the STROBE statement. Patients who received various treatments (various treatments group) or topical mupirocin (mupirocin group) were compared with those who received either no treatment or placebo (control group). The outcomes were skin infection at the central venous catheter insertion site and bacteremia. RESULTS: In total, 2374 patients were included in the analysis, 626 (26.4%) of whom were nasal carriers of S. aureus. The probability of S. aureus infection at the catheter site for hemodialysis was 87% lower in the mupirocin group than in the control group (odds ratio [OR], 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05–0.34; p < 0.001). The risk of bacteremia was 82% lower in the mupirocin group than in the control group (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.08–0.42; p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in bacteremia was observed between the various treatments group (excluding mupirocin) and the control group (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.51–1.15; p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-six percent of patients undergoing hemodialysis were nasal carriers of S. aureus. Of all treatments evaluated, topical mupirocin was the most effective therapy for the reduction of S. aureus catheter site infection and bacteremia in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2369-15-202) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4289586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42895862015-01-12 Screening and treatment for Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Grothe, Cibele Taminato, Mônica Belasco, Angélica Sesso, Ricardo Barbosa, Dulce BMC Nephrol Research Article BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of surveillance for screening and treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis and colonized by Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. The literature search involved the following databases: the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Embase, LILACS, CINAHL, SciELO, and PubMed/Medline. The descriptors were “Staphylococcus aureus”, “MRSA”, “MSSA”, “treatment”, “decolonization”, “nasal carrier”, “colonization”, “chronic kidney disease”, “dialysis”, and “haemodialysis” or “hemodialysis”. Five randomized controlled trials that exhibited agreement among reviewers as shown by a kappa value of >0.80 were included in the study; methodological quality was evaluated using the STROBE statement. Patients who received various treatments (various treatments group) or topical mupirocin (mupirocin group) were compared with those who received either no treatment or placebo (control group). The outcomes were skin infection at the central venous catheter insertion site and bacteremia. RESULTS: In total, 2374 patients were included in the analysis, 626 (26.4%) of whom were nasal carriers of S. aureus. The probability of S. aureus infection at the catheter site for hemodialysis was 87% lower in the mupirocin group than in the control group (odds ratio [OR], 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05–0.34; p < 0.001). The risk of bacteremia was 82% lower in the mupirocin group than in the control group (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.08–0.42; p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference in bacteremia was observed between the various treatments group (excluding mupirocin) and the control group (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.51–1.15; p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-six percent of patients undergoing hemodialysis were nasal carriers of S. aureus. Of all treatments evaluated, topical mupirocin was the most effective therapy for the reduction of S. aureus catheter site infection and bacteremia in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2369-15-202) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4289586/ /pubmed/25519998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-15-202 Text en © Grothe et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grothe, Cibele
Taminato, Mônica
Belasco, Angélica
Sesso, Ricardo
Barbosa, Dulce
Screening and treatment for Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Screening and treatment for Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Screening and treatment for Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Screening and treatment for Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Screening and treatment for Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Screening and treatment for Staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort screening and treatment for staphylococcus aureus in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25519998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2369-15-202
work_keys_str_mv AT grothecibele screeningandtreatmentforstaphylococcusaureusinpatientsundergoinghemodialysisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT taminatomonica screeningandtreatmentforstaphylococcusaureusinpatientsundergoinghemodialysisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT belascoangelica screeningandtreatmentforstaphylococcusaureusinpatientsundergoinghemodialysisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sessoricardo screeningandtreatmentforstaphylococcusaureusinpatientsundergoinghemodialysisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT barbosadulce screeningandtreatmentforstaphylococcusaureusinpatientsundergoinghemodialysisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis