Cargando…

Clinical coding of prospectively identified paediatric adverse drug reactions – a retrospective review of patient records

BACKGROUND: National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in the UK use a system of coding for patient episodes. The coding system used is the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10). There are ICD-10 codes which may be associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and there is a possibility of u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bellis, Jennifer R, Kirkham, Jamie J, Nunn, Anthony J, Pirmohamed, Munir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4290086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25519049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-15-72
_version_ 1782352196264787968
author Bellis, Jennifer R
Kirkham, Jamie J
Nunn, Anthony J
Pirmohamed, Munir
author_facet Bellis, Jennifer R
Kirkham, Jamie J
Nunn, Anthony J
Pirmohamed, Munir
author_sort Bellis, Jennifer R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in the UK use a system of coding for patient episodes. The coding system used is the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10). There are ICD-10 codes which may be associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and there is a possibility of using these codes for ADR surveillance. This study aimed to determine whether ADRs prospectively identified in children admitted to a paediatric hospital were coded appropriately using ICD-10. METHODS: The electronic admission abstract for each patient with at least one ADR was reviewed. A record was made of whether the ADR(s) had been coded using ICD-10. RESULTS: Of 241 ADRs, 76 (31.5%) were coded using at least one ICD-10 ADR code. Of the oncology ADRs, 70/115 (61%) were coded using an ICD-10 ADR code compared with 6/126 (4.8%) non-oncology ADRs (difference in proportions 56%, 95% CI 46.2% to 65.8%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of ADRs detected in a prospective study at a paediatric centre would not have been identified if the study had relied on ICD-10 codes as a single means of detection. Data derived from administrative healthcare databases are not reliable for identifying ADRs by themselves, but may complement other methods of detection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2050-6511-15-72) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4290086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42900862015-01-13 Clinical coding of prospectively identified paediatric adverse drug reactions – a retrospective review of patient records Bellis, Jennifer R Kirkham, Jamie J Nunn, Anthony J Pirmohamed, Munir BMC Pharmacol Toxicol Research Article BACKGROUND: National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in the UK use a system of coding for patient episodes. The coding system used is the International Classification of Disease (ICD-10). There are ICD-10 codes which may be associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and there is a possibility of using these codes for ADR surveillance. This study aimed to determine whether ADRs prospectively identified in children admitted to a paediatric hospital were coded appropriately using ICD-10. METHODS: The electronic admission abstract for each patient with at least one ADR was reviewed. A record was made of whether the ADR(s) had been coded using ICD-10. RESULTS: Of 241 ADRs, 76 (31.5%) were coded using at least one ICD-10 ADR code. Of the oncology ADRs, 70/115 (61%) were coded using an ICD-10 ADR code compared with 6/126 (4.8%) non-oncology ADRs (difference in proportions 56%, 95% CI 46.2% to 65.8%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of ADRs detected in a prospective study at a paediatric centre would not have been identified if the study had relied on ICD-10 codes as a single means of detection. Data derived from administrative healthcare databases are not reliable for identifying ADRs by themselves, but may complement other methods of detection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2050-6511-15-72) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4290086/ /pubmed/25519049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-15-72 Text en © Bellis et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bellis, Jennifer R
Kirkham, Jamie J
Nunn, Anthony J
Pirmohamed, Munir
Clinical coding of prospectively identified paediatric adverse drug reactions – a retrospective review of patient records
title Clinical coding of prospectively identified paediatric adverse drug reactions – a retrospective review of patient records
title_full Clinical coding of prospectively identified paediatric adverse drug reactions – a retrospective review of patient records
title_fullStr Clinical coding of prospectively identified paediatric adverse drug reactions – a retrospective review of patient records
title_full_unstemmed Clinical coding of prospectively identified paediatric adverse drug reactions – a retrospective review of patient records
title_short Clinical coding of prospectively identified paediatric adverse drug reactions – a retrospective review of patient records
title_sort clinical coding of prospectively identified paediatric adverse drug reactions – a retrospective review of patient records
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4290086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25519049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2050-6511-15-72
work_keys_str_mv AT bellisjenniferr clinicalcodingofprospectivelyidentifiedpaediatricadversedrugreactionsaretrospectivereviewofpatientrecords
AT kirkhamjamiej clinicalcodingofprospectivelyidentifiedpaediatricadversedrugreactionsaretrospectivereviewofpatientrecords
AT nunnanthonyj clinicalcodingofprospectivelyidentifiedpaediatricadversedrugreactionsaretrospectivereviewofpatientrecords
AT pirmohamedmunir clinicalcodingofprospectivelyidentifiedpaediatricadversedrugreactionsaretrospectivereviewofpatientrecords