Cargando…

Effect of Abutment Modification and Cement Type on Retention of Cement-Retained Implant Supported Crowns

OBJECTIVE: Provisional cements are commonly used to facilitate retrievability of cement-retained fixed implant restorations; but compromised abutment preparation may affect the retention of implant-retained crowns.The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of abutment design and type of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farzin, Mitra, Torabi, Kianoosh, Ahangari, Ahmad Hasan, Derafshi, Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4290753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628660
_version_ 1782352295341588480
author Farzin, Mitra
Torabi, Kianoosh
Ahangari, Ahmad Hasan
Derafshi, Reza
author_facet Farzin, Mitra
Torabi, Kianoosh
Ahangari, Ahmad Hasan
Derafshi, Reza
author_sort Farzin, Mitra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Provisional cements are commonly used to facilitate retrievability of cement-retained fixed implant restorations; but compromised abutment preparation may affect the retention of implant-retained crowns.The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of abutment design and type of luting agent on the retentive strength of cement-retained implant restorations. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Two prefabricated abutments were attached to their corresponding analogs and embedded in an acrylic resin block. The first abutment (control group) was left intact without any modifications. The screw access channel for the first abutment was completely filled with composite resin. In the second abutment, (test group) the axial wall was partially removed to form an abutment with 3 walls. Wax models were made by CAD/CAM. Ten cast copings were fabricated for each abutment. The prepared copings were cemented on the abutments by Temp Bond luting agent under standardized conditions (n=20). The assemblies were stored in 100% humidity for one day at 37°C prior to testing. The cast crown was removed from the abutment using an Instron machine, and the peak removal force was recorded. Coping/abutment specimens were cleaned after testing, and the testing procedure was repeated for Dycal luting agent (n=20). Data were analyzed with two- way ANOVA (α=0.05). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean transformed retention (Ln-R) between intact abutments (4.90±0.37) and the abutments with 3 walls (4.83±0.25) using Dycal luting agent. However, in TempBond group, the mean transformed retention (Ln-R) was significantly lower in the intact abutment (3.9±0.23) compared to the abutment with 3 walls (4.13±0.33, P=0.027). CONCLUSION: The retention of cement-retained implant restoration can be improved by the type of temporary cement used. The retention of cast crowns cemented to implant abutments with TempBond is influenced by the wall removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4290753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42907532015-01-27 Effect of Abutment Modification and Cement Type on Retention of Cement-Retained Implant Supported Crowns Farzin, Mitra Torabi, Kianoosh Ahangari, Ahmad Hasan Derafshi, Reza J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVE: Provisional cements are commonly used to facilitate retrievability of cement-retained fixed implant restorations; but compromised abutment preparation may affect the retention of implant-retained crowns.The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of abutment design and type of luting agent on the retentive strength of cement-retained implant restorations. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Two prefabricated abutments were attached to their corresponding analogs and embedded in an acrylic resin block. The first abutment (control group) was left intact without any modifications. The screw access channel for the first abutment was completely filled with composite resin. In the second abutment, (test group) the axial wall was partially removed to form an abutment with 3 walls. Wax models were made by CAD/CAM. Ten cast copings were fabricated for each abutment. The prepared copings were cemented on the abutments by Temp Bond luting agent under standardized conditions (n=20). The assemblies were stored in 100% humidity for one day at 37°C prior to testing. The cast crown was removed from the abutment using an Instron machine, and the peak removal force was recorded. Coping/abutment specimens were cleaned after testing, and the testing procedure was repeated for Dycal luting agent (n=20). Data were analyzed with two- way ANOVA (α=0.05). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean transformed retention (Ln-R) between intact abutments (4.90±0.37) and the abutments with 3 walls (4.83±0.25) using Dycal luting agent. However, in TempBond group, the mean transformed retention (Ln-R) was significantly lower in the intact abutment (3.9±0.23) compared to the abutment with 3 walls (4.13±0.33, P=0.027). CONCLUSION: The retention of cement-retained implant restoration can be improved by the type of temporary cement used. The retention of cast crowns cemented to implant abutments with TempBond is influenced by the wall removal. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2014-05 2014-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4290753/ /pubmed/25628660 Text en Copyright © Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Farzin, Mitra
Torabi, Kianoosh
Ahangari, Ahmad Hasan
Derafshi, Reza
Effect of Abutment Modification and Cement Type on Retention of Cement-Retained Implant Supported Crowns
title Effect of Abutment Modification and Cement Type on Retention of Cement-Retained Implant Supported Crowns
title_full Effect of Abutment Modification and Cement Type on Retention of Cement-Retained Implant Supported Crowns
title_fullStr Effect of Abutment Modification and Cement Type on Retention of Cement-Retained Implant Supported Crowns
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Abutment Modification and Cement Type on Retention of Cement-Retained Implant Supported Crowns
title_short Effect of Abutment Modification and Cement Type on Retention of Cement-Retained Implant Supported Crowns
title_sort effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4290753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628660
work_keys_str_mv AT farzinmitra effectofabutmentmodificationandcementtypeonretentionofcementretainedimplantsupportedcrowns
AT torabikianoosh effectofabutmentmodificationandcementtypeonretentionofcementretainedimplantsupportedcrowns
AT ahangariahmadhasan effectofabutmentmodificationandcementtypeonretentionofcementretainedimplantsupportedcrowns
AT derafshireza effectofabutmentmodificationandcementtypeonretentionofcementretainedimplantsupportedcrowns