Cargando…

Changing clinical practice: management of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia

RATIONALE AND AIM: To compare clinical features and management of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia (PCAP) following the publication of UK pneumonia guidelines in 2002 with data from a similar survey at the same hospitals in 2001–2002 (pre-guidelines). METHODS: A prospective survey of 11 hospi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elemraid, Mohamed A, Rushton, Stephen P, Thomas, Matthew F, Spencer, David A, Eastham, Katherine M, Gennery, Andrew R, Clark, Julia E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4291095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24118607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12091
_version_ 1782352342307307520
author Elemraid, Mohamed A
Rushton, Stephen P
Thomas, Matthew F
Spencer, David A
Eastham, Katherine M
Gennery, Andrew R
Clark, Julia E
author_facet Elemraid, Mohamed A
Rushton, Stephen P
Thomas, Matthew F
Spencer, David A
Eastham, Katherine M
Gennery, Andrew R
Clark, Julia E
author_sort Elemraid, Mohamed A
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE AND AIM: To compare clinical features and management of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia (PCAP) following the publication of UK pneumonia guidelines in 2002 with data from a similar survey at the same hospitals in 2001–2002 (pre-guidelines). METHODS: A prospective survey of 11 hospitals in Northern England was undertaken during 2008–2009. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded on children aged ≤16 years who presented with clinical and radiological features of pneumonia. RESULTS: 542 children were included. There was a reduction in all investigations performed (P < 0.001) except C-reactive protein (P = 0.448) between surveys. These included full blood count (76% to 61%); blood culture (70% to 53%) and testing of respiratory secretions for viruses (24% to 12%) and bacteria (18% to 8%). Compared to pre-guidelines, there was a reduction in the use of intravenous antibiotics as a proportion of the total prescribed from 47% to 36% (P < 0.001) and a change in the route of antibiotic administration with increasing preference for oral alone (16% pre-compared to 50% post-guidelines, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Apart from the acute phase reactants that should not be measured routinely, these changes are in line with the guideline recommendations. Improvements in antibiotic use are possible and have implications for future antimicrobial stewardship programmes. Further work using cost-effectiveness analysis may also demonstrate a financial benefit to health services from adoption of guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4291095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42910952015-01-22 Changing clinical practice: management of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia Elemraid, Mohamed A Rushton, Stephen P Thomas, Matthew F Spencer, David A Eastham, Katherine M Gennery, Andrew R Clark, Julia E J Eval Clin Pract Original Articles RATIONALE AND AIM: To compare clinical features and management of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia (PCAP) following the publication of UK pneumonia guidelines in 2002 with data from a similar survey at the same hospitals in 2001–2002 (pre-guidelines). METHODS: A prospective survey of 11 hospitals in Northern England was undertaken during 2008–2009. Clinical and laboratory data were recorded on children aged ≤16 years who presented with clinical and radiological features of pneumonia. RESULTS: 542 children were included. There was a reduction in all investigations performed (P < 0.001) except C-reactive protein (P = 0.448) between surveys. These included full blood count (76% to 61%); blood culture (70% to 53%) and testing of respiratory secretions for viruses (24% to 12%) and bacteria (18% to 8%). Compared to pre-guidelines, there was a reduction in the use of intravenous antibiotics as a proportion of the total prescribed from 47% to 36% (P < 0.001) and a change in the route of antibiotic administration with increasing preference for oral alone (16% pre-compared to 50% post-guidelines, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Apart from the acute phase reactants that should not be measured routinely, these changes are in line with the guideline recommendations. Improvements in antibiotic use are possible and have implications for future antimicrobial stewardship programmes. Further work using cost-effectiveness analysis may also demonstrate a financial benefit to health services from adoption of guidelines. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2014-02 2013-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4291095/ /pubmed/24118607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12091 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Elemraid, Mohamed A
Rushton, Stephen P
Thomas, Matthew F
Spencer, David A
Eastham, Katherine M
Gennery, Andrew R
Clark, Julia E
Changing clinical practice: management of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia
title Changing clinical practice: management of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia
title_full Changing clinical practice: management of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia
title_fullStr Changing clinical practice: management of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed Changing clinical practice: management of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia
title_short Changing clinical practice: management of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia
title_sort changing clinical practice: management of paediatric community-acquired pneumonia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4291095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24118607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jep.12091
work_keys_str_mv AT elemraidmohameda changingclinicalpracticemanagementofpaediatriccommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT rushtonstephenp changingclinicalpracticemanagementofpaediatriccommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT thomasmatthewf changingclinicalpracticemanagementofpaediatriccommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT spencerdavida changingclinicalpracticemanagementofpaediatriccommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT easthamkatherinem changingclinicalpracticemanagementofpaediatriccommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT genneryandrewr changingclinicalpracticemanagementofpaediatriccommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT clarkjuliae changingclinicalpracticemanagementofpaediatriccommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT changingclinicalpracticemanagementofpaediatriccommunityacquiredpneumonia