Cargando…

Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have distinctive roles in various physiological and pathological processes such as inflammatory diseases and cancer. This study explored the performance of eleven scoring functions (D-Score, G-Score, ChemScore, F-Score, PMF-Score, PoseScore, RankScore, DSX, and X-Sco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Shamsara, Jamal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4291136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/162150
_version_ 1782352346505805824
author Shamsara, Jamal
author_facet Shamsara, Jamal
author_sort Shamsara, Jamal
collection PubMed
description Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have distinctive roles in various physiological and pathological processes such as inflammatory diseases and cancer. This study explored the performance of eleven scoring functions (D-Score, G-Score, ChemScore, F-Score, PMF-Score, PoseScore, RankScore, DSX, and X-Score and scoring functions of AutoDock4.1 and AutoDockVina). Their performance was judged by calculation of their correlations to experimental binding affinities of 3D ligand-enzyme complexes of MMP family. Furthermore, they were evaluated for their ability in reranking virtual screening study results performed on a member of MMP family (MMP-12). Enrichment factor at different levels and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to assess their performance. Finally, we have developed a PCA model from the best functions. Of the scoring functions evaluated, F-Score, DSX, and ChemScore were the best overall performers in prediction of MMPs-inhibitors binding affinities while ChemScore, Autodock, and DSX had the best discriminative power in virtual screening against the MMP-12 target. Consensus scorings did not show statistically significant superiority over the other scorings methods in correlation study while PCA model which consists of ChemScore, Autodock, and DSX improved overall enrichment. Outcome of this study could be useful for the setting up of a suitable scoring protocol, resulting in enrichment of MMPs inhibitors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4291136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42911362015-01-21 Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases Shamsara, Jamal Int J Med Chem Research Article Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have distinctive roles in various physiological and pathological processes such as inflammatory diseases and cancer. This study explored the performance of eleven scoring functions (D-Score, G-Score, ChemScore, F-Score, PMF-Score, PoseScore, RankScore, DSX, and X-Score and scoring functions of AutoDock4.1 and AutoDockVina). Their performance was judged by calculation of their correlations to experimental binding affinities of 3D ligand-enzyme complexes of MMP family. Furthermore, they were evaluated for their ability in reranking virtual screening study results performed on a member of MMP family (MMP-12). Enrichment factor at different levels and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to assess their performance. Finally, we have developed a PCA model from the best functions. Of the scoring functions evaluated, F-Score, DSX, and ChemScore were the best overall performers in prediction of MMPs-inhibitors binding affinities while ChemScore, Autodock, and DSX had the best discriminative power in virtual screening against the MMP-12 target. Consensus scorings did not show statistically significant superiority over the other scorings methods in correlation study while PCA model which consists of ChemScore, Autodock, and DSX improved overall enrichment. Outcome of this study could be useful for the setting up of a suitable scoring protocol, resulting in enrichment of MMPs inhibitors. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4291136/ /pubmed/25610645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/162150 Text en Copyright © 2014 Jamal Shamsara. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shamsara, Jamal
Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases
title Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases
title_full Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases
title_fullStr Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases
title_short Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases
title_sort evaluation of 11 scoring functions performance on matrix metalloproteinases
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4291136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/162150
work_keys_str_mv AT shamsarajamal evaluationof11scoringfunctionsperformanceonmatrixmetalloproteinases