Cargando…
Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases
Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have distinctive roles in various physiological and pathological processes such as inflammatory diseases and cancer. This study explored the performance of eleven scoring functions (D-Score, G-Score, ChemScore, F-Score, PMF-Score, PoseScore, RankScore, DSX, and X-Sco...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4291136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/162150 |
_version_ | 1782352346505805824 |
---|---|
author | Shamsara, Jamal |
author_facet | Shamsara, Jamal |
author_sort | Shamsara, Jamal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have distinctive roles in various physiological and pathological processes such as inflammatory diseases and cancer. This study explored the performance of eleven scoring functions (D-Score, G-Score, ChemScore, F-Score, PMF-Score, PoseScore, RankScore, DSX, and X-Score and scoring functions of AutoDock4.1 and AutoDockVina). Their performance was judged by calculation of their correlations to experimental binding affinities of 3D ligand-enzyme complexes of MMP family. Furthermore, they were evaluated for their ability in reranking virtual screening study results performed on a member of MMP family (MMP-12). Enrichment factor at different levels and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to assess their performance. Finally, we have developed a PCA model from the best functions. Of the scoring functions evaluated, F-Score, DSX, and ChemScore were the best overall performers in prediction of MMPs-inhibitors binding affinities while ChemScore, Autodock, and DSX had the best discriminative power in virtual screening against the MMP-12 target. Consensus scorings did not show statistically significant superiority over the other scorings methods in correlation study while PCA model which consists of ChemScore, Autodock, and DSX improved overall enrichment. Outcome of this study could be useful for the setting up of a suitable scoring protocol, resulting in enrichment of MMPs inhibitors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4291136 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42911362015-01-21 Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases Shamsara, Jamal Int J Med Chem Research Article Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) have distinctive roles in various physiological and pathological processes such as inflammatory diseases and cancer. This study explored the performance of eleven scoring functions (D-Score, G-Score, ChemScore, F-Score, PMF-Score, PoseScore, RankScore, DSX, and X-Score and scoring functions of AutoDock4.1 and AutoDockVina). Their performance was judged by calculation of their correlations to experimental binding affinities of 3D ligand-enzyme complexes of MMP family. Furthermore, they were evaluated for their ability in reranking virtual screening study results performed on a member of MMP family (MMP-12). Enrichment factor at different levels and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to assess their performance. Finally, we have developed a PCA model from the best functions. Of the scoring functions evaluated, F-Score, DSX, and ChemScore were the best overall performers in prediction of MMPs-inhibitors binding affinities while ChemScore, Autodock, and DSX had the best discriminative power in virtual screening against the MMP-12 target. Consensus scorings did not show statistically significant superiority over the other scorings methods in correlation study while PCA model which consists of ChemScore, Autodock, and DSX improved overall enrichment. Outcome of this study could be useful for the setting up of a suitable scoring protocol, resulting in enrichment of MMPs inhibitors. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4291136/ /pubmed/25610645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/162150 Text en Copyright © 2014 Jamal Shamsara. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Shamsara, Jamal Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases |
title | Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases |
title_full | Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases |
title_short | Evaluation of 11 Scoring Functions Performance on Matrix Metalloproteinases |
title_sort | evaluation of 11 scoring functions performance on matrix metalloproteinases |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4291136/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/162150 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shamsarajamal evaluationof11scoringfunctionsperformanceonmatrixmetalloproteinases |