Cargando…

Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections

Introduction: We aimed to determine angiography projections with lower Dose Area Product (DAP) rate by measuring the mean DAP and fluoroscopy times in coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and calculating DAP rate in different projections. Methods: DAP and fluorosco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farajollahi, Alireza, Rahimi, Atena, Khayati Shal, Ebrahim, Ghaffari, Samad, Ghojazadeh, Morteza, Tajlil, Arezou, Aslanabadi, Naser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4291604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610557
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/jcvtr.2014.020
_version_ 1782352385794899968
author Farajollahi, Alireza
Rahimi, Atena
Khayati Shal, Ebrahim
Ghaffari, Samad
Ghojazadeh, Morteza
Tajlil, Arezou
Aslanabadi, Naser
author_facet Farajollahi, Alireza
Rahimi, Atena
Khayati Shal, Ebrahim
Ghaffari, Samad
Ghojazadeh, Morteza
Tajlil, Arezou
Aslanabadi, Naser
author_sort Farajollahi, Alireza
collection PubMed
description Introduction: We aimed to determine angiography projections with lower Dose Area Product (DAP) rate by measuring the mean DAP and fluoroscopy times in coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and calculating DAP rate in different projections. Methods: DAP and fluoroscopy times were measured in all employed projections in real-time in 75 patients who underwent CAG or PCI by a single cardiologist in Madani Cardiovascular University Hospital (45 in CAG group and 30 in PCI group). DAP rate was calculated in both groups and in all projections. The projections with highest and lowest DAP rate were determined. Results: Mean DAP was 436.73±315.85 dGy×cm(2) in CAG group and 643.26±359.58 dGy×cm(2) in PCI group. The projection 40° LAO/0° had the highest DAP rate in CAG group (28.98 dGy×cm(2)/ sec) and it was highest in 20° RAO/30° CR in PCI group (29.83 dGy×cm(2)/sec). The latter projection was also the most employed projection in PCI group. Conclusion: The amount of radiation dose in this study is in consistent with the previous reports. Specific angiographic projections expose patients to significantly higher radiation and they should be avoided and replaced by less irradiating projections whenever possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4291604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42916042015-01-21 Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections Farajollahi, Alireza Rahimi, Atena Khayati Shal, Ebrahim Ghaffari, Samad Ghojazadeh, Morteza Tajlil, Arezou Aslanabadi, Naser J Cardiovasc Thorac Res Original Article Introduction: We aimed to determine angiography projections with lower Dose Area Product (DAP) rate by measuring the mean DAP and fluoroscopy times in coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and calculating DAP rate in different projections. Methods: DAP and fluoroscopy times were measured in all employed projections in real-time in 75 patients who underwent CAG or PCI by a single cardiologist in Madani Cardiovascular University Hospital (45 in CAG group and 30 in PCI group). DAP rate was calculated in both groups and in all projections. The projections with highest and lowest DAP rate were determined. Results: Mean DAP was 436.73±315.85 dGy×cm(2) in CAG group and 643.26±359.58 dGy×cm(2) in PCI group. The projection 40° LAO/0° had the highest DAP rate in CAG group (28.98 dGy×cm(2)/ sec) and it was highest in 20° RAO/30° CR in PCI group (29.83 dGy×cm(2)/sec). The latter projection was also the most employed projection in PCI group. Conclusion: The amount of radiation dose in this study is in consistent with the previous reports. Specific angiographic projections expose patients to significantly higher radiation and they should be avoided and replaced by less irradiating projections whenever possible. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2014 2014-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4291604/ /pubmed/25610557 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/jcvtr.2014.020 Text en © 2014 The Author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Farajollahi, Alireza
Rahimi, Atena
Khayati Shal, Ebrahim
Ghaffari, Samad
Ghojazadeh, Morteza
Tajlil, Arezou
Aslanabadi, Naser
Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections
title Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections
title_full Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections
title_fullStr Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections
title_full_unstemmed Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections
title_short Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections
title_sort patient’s radiation exposure in coronary angiography and angioplasty: the impact of different projections
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4291604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610557
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/jcvtr.2014.020
work_keys_str_mv AT farajollahialireza patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections
AT rahimiatena patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections
AT khayatishalebrahim patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections
AT ghaffarisamad patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections
AT ghojazadehmorteza patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections
AT tajlilarezou patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections
AT aslanabadinaser patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections