Cargando…
Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections
Introduction: We aimed to determine angiography projections with lower Dose Area Product (DAP) rate by measuring the mean DAP and fluoroscopy times in coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and calculating DAP rate in different projections. Methods: DAP and fluorosco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4291604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610557 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/jcvtr.2014.020 |
_version_ | 1782352385794899968 |
---|---|
author | Farajollahi, Alireza Rahimi, Atena Khayati Shal, Ebrahim Ghaffari, Samad Ghojazadeh, Morteza Tajlil, Arezou Aslanabadi, Naser |
author_facet | Farajollahi, Alireza Rahimi, Atena Khayati Shal, Ebrahim Ghaffari, Samad Ghojazadeh, Morteza Tajlil, Arezou Aslanabadi, Naser |
author_sort | Farajollahi, Alireza |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: We aimed to determine angiography projections with lower Dose Area Product (DAP) rate by measuring the mean DAP and fluoroscopy times in coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and calculating DAP rate in different projections. Methods: DAP and fluoroscopy times were measured in all employed projections in real-time in 75 patients who underwent CAG or PCI by a single cardiologist in Madani Cardiovascular University Hospital (45 in CAG group and 30 in PCI group). DAP rate was calculated in both groups and in all projections. The projections with highest and lowest DAP rate were determined. Results: Mean DAP was 436.73±315.85 dGy×cm(2) in CAG group and 643.26±359.58 dGy×cm(2) in PCI group. The projection 40° LAO/0° had the highest DAP rate in CAG group (28.98 dGy×cm(2)/ sec) and it was highest in 20° RAO/30° CR in PCI group (29.83 dGy×cm(2)/sec). The latter projection was also the most employed projection in PCI group. Conclusion: The amount of radiation dose in this study is in consistent with the previous reports. Specific angiographic projections expose patients to significantly higher radiation and they should be avoided and replaced by less irradiating projections whenever possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4291604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42916042015-01-21 Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections Farajollahi, Alireza Rahimi, Atena Khayati Shal, Ebrahim Ghaffari, Samad Ghojazadeh, Morteza Tajlil, Arezou Aslanabadi, Naser J Cardiovasc Thorac Res Original Article Introduction: We aimed to determine angiography projections with lower Dose Area Product (DAP) rate by measuring the mean DAP and fluoroscopy times in coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and calculating DAP rate in different projections. Methods: DAP and fluoroscopy times were measured in all employed projections in real-time in 75 patients who underwent CAG or PCI by a single cardiologist in Madani Cardiovascular University Hospital (45 in CAG group and 30 in PCI group). DAP rate was calculated in both groups and in all projections. The projections with highest and lowest DAP rate were determined. Results: Mean DAP was 436.73±315.85 dGy×cm(2) in CAG group and 643.26±359.58 dGy×cm(2) in PCI group. The projection 40° LAO/0° had the highest DAP rate in CAG group (28.98 dGy×cm(2)/ sec) and it was highest in 20° RAO/30° CR in PCI group (29.83 dGy×cm(2)/sec). The latter projection was also the most employed projection in PCI group. Conclusion: The amount of radiation dose in this study is in consistent with the previous reports. Specific angiographic projections expose patients to significantly higher radiation and they should be avoided and replaced by less irradiating projections whenever possible. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2014 2014-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4291604/ /pubmed/25610557 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/jcvtr.2014.020 Text en © 2014 The Author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Farajollahi, Alireza Rahimi, Atena Khayati Shal, Ebrahim Ghaffari, Samad Ghojazadeh, Morteza Tajlil, Arezou Aslanabadi, Naser Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections |
title | Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections |
title_full | Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections |
title_fullStr | Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections |
title_short | Patient’s Radiation Exposure in Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty: The Impact of Different Projections |
title_sort | patient’s radiation exposure in coronary angiography and angioplasty: the impact of different projections |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4291604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610557 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/jcvtr.2014.020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farajollahialireza patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections AT rahimiatena patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections AT khayatishalebrahim patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections AT ghaffarisamad patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections AT ghojazadehmorteza patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections AT tajlilarezou patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections AT aslanabadinaser patientsradiationexposureincoronaryangiographyandangioplastytheimpactofdifferentprojections |