Cargando…
The Modifications of the Sagittal Ramus Split Osteotomy: A Literature Review
BACKGROUND: In 1953, the sagittal ramus split osteotomy was introduced by Obwegeser. For many years, and in some countries still, this technique has defined the term oral and maxillofacial surgery. METHODS: The basic design of the sagittal ramus split surgical procedure evolved very quickly. The ori...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4292253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25587505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000127 |
_version_ | 1782352467674005504 |
---|---|
author | Böckmann, Roland Meyns, Joeri Dik, Eric Kessler, Peter |
author_facet | Böckmann, Roland Meyns, Joeri Dik, Eric Kessler, Peter |
author_sort | Böckmann, Roland |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 1953, the sagittal ramus split osteotomy was introduced by Obwegeser. For many years, and in some countries still, this technique has defined the term oral and maxillofacial surgery. METHODS: The basic design of the sagittal ramus split surgical procedure evolved very quickly. The original operation technique by Obwegeser was shortly after improved by Dal Pont’s modification. The second major improvement of the basic technique was added by Hunsuck in 1967. Since then, the technical and biological procedure has been well defined. Resolution of the problems many surgeons encountered has, however, taken longer. Some of these problems, such as the unfavorable split or the damage of the inferior alveolar nerve, have not been satisfactorily resolved. RESULTS: Further modifications, with or without the application of new instruments, have been introduced by Epker and Wolford, whose modification was recently elaborated by Böckmann. The addition of a fourth osteotomy at the inferior mandibular border in an in vitro experiment led to a significant reduction of the torque forces required for the mandibular split. CONCLUSIONS: The literature was reviewed, and the last modifications of the successful traditional splitting procedure are presented narrowly. It indicates the better the split is preformatted by osteotomies, the less torque force is needed while splitting, giving more controle, a better predictability of the lingual fracture and maybe less neurosensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4292253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42922532015-01-13 The Modifications of the Sagittal Ramus Split Osteotomy: A Literature Review Böckmann, Roland Meyns, Joeri Dik, Eric Kessler, Peter Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Articles BACKGROUND: In 1953, the sagittal ramus split osteotomy was introduced by Obwegeser. For many years, and in some countries still, this technique has defined the term oral and maxillofacial surgery. METHODS: The basic design of the sagittal ramus split surgical procedure evolved very quickly. The original operation technique by Obwegeser was shortly after improved by Dal Pont’s modification. The second major improvement of the basic technique was added by Hunsuck in 1967. Since then, the technical and biological procedure has been well defined. Resolution of the problems many surgeons encountered has, however, taken longer. Some of these problems, such as the unfavorable split or the damage of the inferior alveolar nerve, have not been satisfactorily resolved. RESULTS: Further modifications, with or without the application of new instruments, have been introduced by Epker and Wolford, whose modification was recently elaborated by Böckmann. The addition of a fourth osteotomy at the inferior mandibular border in an in vitro experiment led to a significant reduction of the torque forces required for the mandibular split. CONCLUSIONS: The literature was reviewed, and the last modifications of the successful traditional splitting procedure are presented narrowly. It indicates the better the split is preformatted by osteotomies, the less torque force is needed while splitting, giving more controle, a better predictability of the lingual fracture and maybe less neurosensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve. Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4292253/ /pubmed/25587505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000127 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. PRS Global Open is a publication of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Böckmann, Roland Meyns, Joeri Dik, Eric Kessler, Peter The Modifications of the Sagittal Ramus Split Osteotomy: A Literature Review |
title | The Modifications of the Sagittal Ramus Split Osteotomy: A Literature Review |
title_full | The Modifications of the Sagittal Ramus Split Osteotomy: A Literature Review |
title_fullStr | The Modifications of the Sagittal Ramus Split Osteotomy: A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Modifications of the Sagittal Ramus Split Osteotomy: A Literature Review |
title_short | The Modifications of the Sagittal Ramus Split Osteotomy: A Literature Review |
title_sort | modifications of the sagittal ramus split osteotomy: a literature review |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4292253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25587505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bockmannroland themodificationsofthesagittalramussplitosteotomyaliteraturereview AT meynsjoeri themodificationsofthesagittalramussplitosteotomyaliteraturereview AT dikeric themodificationsofthesagittalramussplitosteotomyaliteraturereview AT kesslerpeter themodificationsofthesagittalramussplitosteotomyaliteraturereview AT bockmannroland modificationsofthesagittalramussplitosteotomyaliteraturereview AT meynsjoeri modificationsofthesagittalramussplitosteotomyaliteraturereview AT dikeric modificationsofthesagittalramussplitosteotomyaliteraturereview AT kesslerpeter modificationsofthesagittalramussplitosteotomyaliteraturereview |