Cargando…
Stem cell therapy in spinal trauma: Does it have scientific validity?
Stem cell-based interventions aim to use special regenerative cells (stem cells) to facilitate neuronal function beyond the site of the injury. Many studies involving animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI) suggest that certain stem cell-based therapies may restore function after SCI. Currently, i...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4292327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25593357 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.143913 |
_version_ | 1782352474872479744 |
---|---|
author | Chhabra, Harvinder Singh Sarda, Kanchan |
author_facet | Chhabra, Harvinder Singh Sarda, Kanchan |
author_sort | Chhabra, Harvinder Singh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Stem cell-based interventions aim to use special regenerative cells (stem cells) to facilitate neuronal function beyond the site of the injury. Many studies involving animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI) suggest that certain stem cell-based therapies may restore function after SCI. Currently, in case of spinal cord injuries, new discoveries with clinical implications have been continuously made in basic stem cell research, and stem cell-based approaches are advancing rapidly toward application in patients. There is a huge base of preclinical evidence in vitro and in animal models which suggests the safety and clinical efficacy of cellular therapies after SCI. Despite this, data from clinical studies is not very encouraging and at times confounding. Here, we have attempted to cover preclinical and clinical evidence base dealing with safety, feasibility and efficacy of cell based interventions after SCI. The limitations of preclinical data and the reasons underlying its failure to translate in a clinical setting are also discussed. Based on the evidence base, it is suggested that a multifactorial approach is required to address this situation. Need for standardized, stringently designed multi-centric clinical trials for obtaining validated proof of evidence is also highlighted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4292327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42923272015-01-15 Stem cell therapy in spinal trauma: Does it have scientific validity? Chhabra, Harvinder Singh Sarda, Kanchan Indian J Orthop Symposium-ICL-2014 Stem cell-based interventions aim to use special regenerative cells (stem cells) to facilitate neuronal function beyond the site of the injury. Many studies involving animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI) suggest that certain stem cell-based therapies may restore function after SCI. Currently, in case of spinal cord injuries, new discoveries with clinical implications have been continuously made in basic stem cell research, and stem cell-based approaches are advancing rapidly toward application in patients. There is a huge base of preclinical evidence in vitro and in animal models which suggests the safety and clinical efficacy of cellular therapies after SCI. Despite this, data from clinical studies is not very encouraging and at times confounding. Here, we have attempted to cover preclinical and clinical evidence base dealing with safety, feasibility and efficacy of cell based interventions after SCI. The limitations of preclinical data and the reasons underlying its failure to translate in a clinical setting are also discussed. Based on the evidence base, it is suggested that a multifactorial approach is required to address this situation. Need for standardized, stringently designed multi-centric clinical trials for obtaining validated proof of evidence is also highlighted. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4292327/ /pubmed/25593357 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.143913 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Orthopaedics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Symposium-ICL-2014 Chhabra, Harvinder Singh Sarda, Kanchan Stem cell therapy in spinal trauma: Does it have scientific validity? |
title | Stem cell therapy in spinal trauma: Does it have scientific validity? |
title_full | Stem cell therapy in spinal trauma: Does it have scientific validity? |
title_fullStr | Stem cell therapy in spinal trauma: Does it have scientific validity? |
title_full_unstemmed | Stem cell therapy in spinal trauma: Does it have scientific validity? |
title_short | Stem cell therapy in spinal trauma: Does it have scientific validity? |
title_sort | stem cell therapy in spinal trauma: does it have scientific validity? |
topic | Symposium-ICL-2014 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4292327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25593357 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.143913 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chhabraharvindersingh stemcelltherapyinspinaltraumadoesithavescientificvalidity AT sardakanchan stemcelltherapyinspinaltraumadoesithavescientificvalidity |