Cargando…
Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading
Metaphors are common elements of language that allow us to creatively stretch the limits of word meaning. However, metaphors vary in their degree of novelty, which determines whether people must create new meanings on-line or retrieve previously known metaphorical meanings from memory. Such variatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4292575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01057 |
_version_ | 1782352503407378432 |
---|---|
author | Columbus, Georgie Sheikh, Naveed A. Côté-Lecaldare, Marilena Häuser, Katja Baum, Shari R. Titone, Debra |
author_facet | Columbus, Georgie Sheikh, Naveed A. Côté-Lecaldare, Marilena Häuser, Katja Baum, Shari R. Titone, Debra |
author_sort | Columbus, Georgie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Metaphors are common elements of language that allow us to creatively stretch the limits of word meaning. However, metaphors vary in their degree of novelty, which determines whether people must create new meanings on-line or retrieve previously known metaphorical meanings from memory. Such variations affect the degree to which general cognitive capacities such as executive control are required for successful comprehension. We investigated whether individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing using eye movement measures of reading. Thirty-nine participants read sentences including metaphors or idioms, another form of figurative language that is more likely to rely on meaning retrieval. They also completed the AX-CPT, a domain-general executive control task. In Experiment 1, we examined sentences containing metaphorical or literal uses of verbs, presented with or without prior context. In Experiment 2, we examined sentences containing idioms or literal phrases for the same participants to determine whether the link to executive control was qualitatively similar or different to Experiment 1. When metaphors were low familiar, all people read verbs used as metaphors more slowly than verbs used literally (this difference was smaller for high familiar metaphors). Executive control capacity modulated this pattern in that high executive control readers spent more time reading verbs when a prior context forced a particular interpretation (metaphorical or literal), and they had faster total metaphor reading times when there was a prior context. Interestingly, executive control did not relate to idiom processing for the same readers. Here, all readers had faster total reading times for high familiar idioms than literal phrases. Thus, executive control relates to metaphor but not idiom processing for these readers, and for the particular metaphor and idiom reading manipulations presented. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4292575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42925752015-01-27 Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading Columbus, Georgie Sheikh, Naveed A. Côté-Lecaldare, Marilena Häuser, Katja Baum, Shari R. Titone, Debra Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Metaphors are common elements of language that allow us to creatively stretch the limits of word meaning. However, metaphors vary in their degree of novelty, which determines whether people must create new meanings on-line or retrieve previously known metaphorical meanings from memory. Such variations affect the degree to which general cognitive capacities such as executive control are required for successful comprehension. We investigated whether individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing using eye movement measures of reading. Thirty-nine participants read sentences including metaphors or idioms, another form of figurative language that is more likely to rely on meaning retrieval. They also completed the AX-CPT, a domain-general executive control task. In Experiment 1, we examined sentences containing metaphorical or literal uses of verbs, presented with or without prior context. In Experiment 2, we examined sentences containing idioms or literal phrases for the same participants to determine whether the link to executive control was qualitatively similar or different to Experiment 1. When metaphors were low familiar, all people read verbs used as metaphors more slowly than verbs used literally (this difference was smaller for high familiar metaphors). Executive control capacity modulated this pattern in that high executive control readers spent more time reading verbs when a prior context forced a particular interpretation (metaphorical or literal), and they had faster total metaphor reading times when there was a prior context. Interestingly, executive control did not relate to idiom processing for the same readers. Here, all readers had faster total reading times for high familiar idioms than literal phrases. Thus, executive control relates to metaphor but not idiom processing for these readers, and for the particular metaphor and idiom reading manipulations presented. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4292575/ /pubmed/25628557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01057 Text en Copyright © 2015 Columbus, Sheikh, Côté-Lecaldare, Häuser, Baum and Titone. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Columbus, Georgie Sheikh, Naveed A. Côté-Lecaldare, Marilena Häuser, Katja Baum, Shari R. Titone, Debra Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading |
title | Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading |
title_full | Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading |
title_fullStr | Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading |
title_full_unstemmed | Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading |
title_short | Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading |
title_sort | individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: an eye movement study of sentence reading |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4292575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.01057 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT columbusgeorgie individualdifferencesinexecutivecontrolrelatetometaphorprocessinganeyemovementstudyofsentencereading AT sheikhnaveeda individualdifferencesinexecutivecontrolrelatetometaphorprocessinganeyemovementstudyofsentencereading AT cotelecaldaremarilena individualdifferencesinexecutivecontrolrelatetometaphorprocessinganeyemovementstudyofsentencereading AT hauserkatja individualdifferencesinexecutivecontrolrelatetometaphorprocessinganeyemovementstudyofsentencereading AT baumsharir individualdifferencesinexecutivecontrolrelatetometaphorprocessinganeyemovementstudyofsentencereading AT titonedebra individualdifferencesinexecutivecontrolrelatetometaphorprocessinganeyemovementstudyofsentencereading |