Cargando…

Intention tremor and deficits of sensory feedback control in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Intention tremor and dysmetria are leading causes of upper extremity disability in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The development of effective therapies to reduce tremor and dysmetria is hampered by insufficient understanding of how the distributed, multi-focal lesions associated with MS impac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heenan, Megan, Scheidt, Robert A, Woo, Douglas, Beardsley, Scott A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4292988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25526770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-170
_version_ 1782352560566304768
author Heenan, Megan
Scheidt, Robert A
Woo, Douglas
Beardsley, Scott A
author_facet Heenan, Megan
Scheidt, Robert A
Woo, Douglas
Beardsley, Scott A
author_sort Heenan, Megan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intention tremor and dysmetria are leading causes of upper extremity disability in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The development of effective therapies to reduce tremor and dysmetria is hampered by insufficient understanding of how the distributed, multi-focal lesions associated with MS impact sensorimotor control in the brain. Here we describe a systems-level approach to characterizing sensorimotor control and use this approach to examine how sensory and motor processes are differentially impacted by MS. METHODS: Eight subjects with MS and eight age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects performed visually-guided flexion/extension tasks about the elbow to characterize a sensory feedback control model that includes three sensory feedback pathways (one for vision, another for proprioception and a third providing an internal prediction of the sensory consequences of action). The model allows us to characterize impairments in sensory feedback control that contributed to each MS subject’s tremor. RESULTS: Models derived from MS subject performance differed from those obtained for control subjects in two ways. First, subjects with MS exhibited markedly increased visual feedback delays, which were uncompensated by internal adaptive mechanisms; stabilization performance in individuals with the longest delays differed most from control subject performance. Second, subjects with MS exhibited misestimates of arm dynamics in a way that was correlated with tremor power. Subject-specific models accurately predicted kinematic performance in a reach and hold task for neurologically-intact control subjects while simulated performance of MS patients had shorter movement intervals and larger endpoint errors than actual subject responses. This difference between simulated and actual performance is consistent with a strategic compensatory trade-off of movement speed for endpoint accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that tremor and dysmetria may be caused by limitations in the brain’s ability to adapt sensory feedback mechanisms to compensate for increases in visual information processing time, as well as by errors in compensatory adaptations of internal estimates of arm dynamics. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-170) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4292988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42929882015-01-14 Intention tremor and deficits of sensory feedback control in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study Heenan, Megan Scheidt, Robert A Woo, Douglas Beardsley, Scott A J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Intention tremor and dysmetria are leading causes of upper extremity disability in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The development of effective therapies to reduce tremor and dysmetria is hampered by insufficient understanding of how the distributed, multi-focal lesions associated with MS impact sensorimotor control in the brain. Here we describe a systems-level approach to characterizing sensorimotor control and use this approach to examine how sensory and motor processes are differentially impacted by MS. METHODS: Eight subjects with MS and eight age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects performed visually-guided flexion/extension tasks about the elbow to characterize a sensory feedback control model that includes three sensory feedback pathways (one for vision, another for proprioception and a third providing an internal prediction of the sensory consequences of action). The model allows us to characterize impairments in sensory feedback control that contributed to each MS subject’s tremor. RESULTS: Models derived from MS subject performance differed from those obtained for control subjects in two ways. First, subjects with MS exhibited markedly increased visual feedback delays, which were uncompensated by internal adaptive mechanisms; stabilization performance in individuals with the longest delays differed most from control subject performance. Second, subjects with MS exhibited misestimates of arm dynamics in a way that was correlated with tremor power. Subject-specific models accurately predicted kinematic performance in a reach and hold task for neurologically-intact control subjects while simulated performance of MS patients had shorter movement intervals and larger endpoint errors than actual subject responses. This difference between simulated and actual performance is consistent with a strategic compensatory trade-off of movement speed for endpoint accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that tremor and dysmetria may be caused by limitations in the brain’s ability to adapt sensory feedback mechanisms to compensate for increases in visual information processing time, as well as by errors in compensatory adaptations of internal estimates of arm dynamics. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-170) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4292988/ /pubmed/25526770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-170 Text en © Heenan et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Heenan, Megan
Scheidt, Robert A
Woo, Douglas
Beardsley, Scott A
Intention tremor and deficits of sensory feedback control in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study
title Intention tremor and deficits of sensory feedback control in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study
title_full Intention tremor and deficits of sensory feedback control in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study
title_fullStr Intention tremor and deficits of sensory feedback control in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Intention tremor and deficits of sensory feedback control in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study
title_short Intention tremor and deficits of sensory feedback control in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study
title_sort intention tremor and deficits of sensory feedback control in multiple sclerosis: a pilot study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4292988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25526770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-170
work_keys_str_mv AT heenanmegan intentiontremoranddeficitsofsensoryfeedbackcontrolinmultiplesclerosisapilotstudy
AT scheidtroberta intentiontremoranddeficitsofsensoryfeedbackcontrolinmultiplesclerosisapilotstudy
AT woodouglas intentiontremoranddeficitsofsensoryfeedbackcontrolinmultiplesclerosisapilotstudy
AT beardsleyscotta intentiontremoranddeficitsofsensoryfeedbackcontrolinmultiplesclerosisapilotstudy