Cargando…
A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic shoulder operations (ASS) are often associated with severe postoperative pain. Nerve blocks have been studied for pain in shoulder surgeries. Interscalene brachial plexus blocks (ISB) and an intra-articular injection (IA) have been reported in many studies. The aim of the pr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Pain Society
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4293507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25589946 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.1.45 |
_version_ | 1782352601569820672 |
---|---|
author | Park, Sun Kyung Choi, Yun Suk Choi, Sung Wook Song, Sung Wook |
author_facet | Park, Sun Kyung Choi, Yun Suk Choi, Sung Wook Song, Sung Wook |
author_sort | Park, Sun Kyung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic shoulder operations (ASS) are often associated with severe postoperative pain. Nerve blocks have been studied for pain in shoulder surgeries. Interscalene brachial plexus blocks (ISB) and an intra-articular injection (IA) have been reported in many studies. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of ISB, a continuous cervical epidural block (CCE) and IA as a means of postoperative pain control and to study the influence of these procedures on postoperative analgesic consumption and after ASS. METHODS: Fifty seven patients who underwent ASS under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the ISB group (n = 19), the CCE group (n = 19), and the IA group (n = 19). Patients in each group were evaluated on a postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS), their rescue opioid dosage (ROD), and side effects. RESULTS: Postoperative NRSs were found to be higher in the IA group than in the ISB and CCE groups both at rest and on movement. The ROD were 1.6 ± 2.3, 3.0 ± 4.9 and 7.1 ± 7.9 mg morphine equivalent dose in groups CCE, ISB, and IA groups (P = 0.001), respectively, and statistically significant differences were noted between the CCE and IA groups (P = 0.01) but not in between the ISB and CCE groups. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, randomized study demonstrated that ISB is as effective analgesic technique as a CCE for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing ASS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4293507 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Pain Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42935072015-01-14 A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery Park, Sun Kyung Choi, Yun Suk Choi, Sung Wook Song, Sung Wook Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic shoulder operations (ASS) are often associated with severe postoperative pain. Nerve blocks have been studied for pain in shoulder surgeries. Interscalene brachial plexus blocks (ISB) and an intra-articular injection (IA) have been reported in many studies. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of ISB, a continuous cervical epidural block (CCE) and IA as a means of postoperative pain control and to study the influence of these procedures on postoperative analgesic consumption and after ASS. METHODS: Fifty seven patients who underwent ASS under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the ISB group (n = 19), the CCE group (n = 19), and the IA group (n = 19). Patients in each group were evaluated on a postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS), their rescue opioid dosage (ROD), and side effects. RESULTS: Postoperative NRSs were found to be higher in the IA group than in the ISB and CCE groups both at rest and on movement. The ROD were 1.6 ± 2.3, 3.0 ± 4.9 and 7.1 ± 7.9 mg morphine equivalent dose in groups CCE, ISB, and IA groups (P = 0.001), respectively, and statistically significant differences were noted between the CCE and IA groups (P = 0.01) but not in between the ISB and CCE groups. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, randomized study demonstrated that ISB is as effective analgesic technique as a CCE for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing ASS. The Korean Pain Society 2015-01 2015-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4293507/ /pubmed/25589946 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.1.45 Text en Copyright © The Korean Pain Society, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Park, Sun Kyung Choi, Yun Suk Choi, Sung Wook Song, Sung Wook A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery |
title | A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery |
title_full | A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery |
title_short | A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery |
title_sort | comparison of three methods for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4293507/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25589946 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.1.45 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parksunkyung acomparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery AT choiyunsuk acomparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery AT choisungwook acomparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery AT songsungwook acomparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery AT parksunkyung comparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery AT choiyunsuk comparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery AT choisungwook comparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery AT songsungwook comparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery |