Cargando…

A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic shoulder operations (ASS) are often associated with severe postoperative pain. Nerve blocks have been studied for pain in shoulder surgeries. Interscalene brachial plexus blocks (ISB) and an intra-articular injection (IA) have been reported in many studies. The aim of the pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Sun Kyung, Choi, Yun Suk, Choi, Sung Wook, Song, Sung Wook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Pain Society 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4293507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25589946
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.1.45
_version_ 1782352601569820672
author Park, Sun Kyung
Choi, Yun Suk
Choi, Sung Wook
Song, Sung Wook
author_facet Park, Sun Kyung
Choi, Yun Suk
Choi, Sung Wook
Song, Sung Wook
author_sort Park, Sun Kyung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic shoulder operations (ASS) are often associated with severe postoperative pain. Nerve blocks have been studied for pain in shoulder surgeries. Interscalene brachial plexus blocks (ISB) and an intra-articular injection (IA) have been reported in many studies. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of ISB, a continuous cervical epidural block (CCE) and IA as a means of postoperative pain control and to study the influence of these procedures on postoperative analgesic consumption and after ASS. METHODS: Fifty seven patients who underwent ASS under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the ISB group (n = 19), the CCE group (n = 19), and the IA group (n = 19). Patients in each group were evaluated on a postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS), their rescue opioid dosage (ROD), and side effects. RESULTS: Postoperative NRSs were found to be higher in the IA group than in the ISB and CCE groups both at rest and on movement. The ROD were 1.6 ± 2.3, 3.0 ± 4.9 and 7.1 ± 7.9 mg morphine equivalent dose in groups CCE, ISB, and IA groups (P = 0.001), respectively, and statistically significant differences were noted between the CCE and IA groups (P = 0.01) but not in between the ISB and CCE groups. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, randomized study demonstrated that ISB is as effective analgesic technique as a CCE for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing ASS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4293507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Pain Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42935072015-01-14 A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery Park, Sun Kyung Choi, Yun Suk Choi, Sung Wook Song, Sung Wook Korean J Pain Original Article BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic shoulder operations (ASS) are often associated with severe postoperative pain. Nerve blocks have been studied for pain in shoulder surgeries. Interscalene brachial plexus blocks (ISB) and an intra-articular injection (IA) have been reported in many studies. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of ISB, a continuous cervical epidural block (CCE) and IA as a means of postoperative pain control and to study the influence of these procedures on postoperative analgesic consumption and after ASS. METHODS: Fifty seven patients who underwent ASS under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the ISB group (n = 19), the CCE group (n = 19), and the IA group (n = 19). Patients in each group were evaluated on a postoperative numerical rating scale (NRS), their rescue opioid dosage (ROD), and side effects. RESULTS: Postoperative NRSs were found to be higher in the IA group than in the ISB and CCE groups both at rest and on movement. The ROD were 1.6 ± 2.3, 3.0 ± 4.9 and 7.1 ± 7.9 mg morphine equivalent dose in groups CCE, ISB, and IA groups (P = 0.001), respectively, and statistically significant differences were noted between the CCE and IA groups (P = 0.01) but not in between the ISB and CCE groups. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective, randomized study demonstrated that ISB is as effective analgesic technique as a CCE for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing ASS. The Korean Pain Society 2015-01 2015-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4293507/ /pubmed/25589946 http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.1.45 Text en Copyright © The Korean Pain Society, 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Park, Sun Kyung
Choi, Yun Suk
Choi, Sung Wook
Song, Sung Wook
A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
title A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
title_full A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
title_fullStr A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
title_short A Comparison of Three Methods for Postoperative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
title_sort comparison of three methods for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4293507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25589946
http://dx.doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2015.28.1.45
work_keys_str_mv AT parksunkyung acomparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery
AT choiyunsuk acomparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery
AT choisungwook acomparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery
AT songsungwook acomparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery
AT parksunkyung comparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery
AT choiyunsuk comparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery
AT choisungwook comparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery
AT songsungwook comparisonofthreemethodsforpostoperativepaincontrolinpatientsundergoingarthroscopicshouldersurgery