Cargando…

Clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after second- or third-generation drug-eluting stent insertion in clinically stable patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In the bare-metal stent era, routine follow-up coronary angiography (RFU CAG) was used to ensure stent patency. With the advent of drug-eluting stents (DESs) with better safety and efficacy profiles, RFU CAG has been performed less often. There are few data on the clinical impact of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Seonghoon, Mun, Hee-Sun, Kang, Min-Kyung, Cho, Jung Rae, Han, Seong Woo, Lee, Namho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4293563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25589835
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2015.30.1.49
_version_ 1782352609045118976
author Choi, Seonghoon
Mun, Hee-Sun
Kang, Min-Kyung
Cho, Jung Rae
Han, Seong Woo
Lee, Namho
author_facet Choi, Seonghoon
Mun, Hee-Sun
Kang, Min-Kyung
Cho, Jung Rae
Han, Seong Woo
Lee, Namho
author_sort Choi, Seonghoon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: In the bare-metal stent era, routine follow-up coronary angiography (RFU CAG) was used to ensure stent patency. With the advent of drug-eluting stents (DESs) with better safety and efficacy profiles, RFU CAG has been performed less often. There are few data on the clinical impact of RFU CAG after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients with coronary artery disease; the aim of this study was to examine this issue. METHODS: We analyzed clinical outcomes retrospectively of 259 patients who were event-free at 12-month after stent implantation and did not undergo RFU CAG (clinical follow-up group) and 364 patients who were event-free prior to RFU CAG (angiographic follow-up group). Baseline characteristics were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier estimated total survival and major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free survival did not differ between the groups (p = 0.100 and p = 0.461, respectively). The cumulative MACE rate was also not different between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 2.02). In the angiographic follow-up group, 8.8% revascularization was seen at RFU CAG. CONCLUSIONS: RFU CAG did not affect long-term clinical outcome after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4293563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42935632015-01-14 Clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after second- or third-generation drug-eluting stent insertion in clinically stable patients Choi, Seonghoon Mun, Hee-Sun Kang, Min-Kyung Cho, Jung Rae Han, Seong Woo Lee, Namho Korean J Intern Med Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: In the bare-metal stent era, routine follow-up coronary angiography (RFU CAG) was used to ensure stent patency. With the advent of drug-eluting stents (DESs) with better safety and efficacy profiles, RFU CAG has been performed less often. There are few data on the clinical impact of RFU CAG after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients with coronary artery disease; the aim of this study was to examine this issue. METHODS: We analyzed clinical outcomes retrospectively of 259 patients who were event-free at 12-month after stent implantation and did not undergo RFU CAG (clinical follow-up group) and 364 patients who were event-free prior to RFU CAG (angiographic follow-up group). Baseline characteristics were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier estimated total survival and major adverse cardiac event (MACE)-free survival did not differ between the groups (p = 0.100 and p = 0.461, respectively). The cumulative MACE rate was also not different between the groups (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.35 to 2.02). In the angiographic follow-up group, 8.8% revascularization was seen at RFU CAG. CONCLUSIONS: RFU CAG did not affect long-term clinical outcome after second- or third-generation DES implantation in clinically stable patients. The Korean Association of Internal Medicine 2015-01 2014-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4293563/ /pubmed/25589835 http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2015.30.1.49 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choi, Seonghoon
Mun, Hee-Sun
Kang, Min-Kyung
Cho, Jung Rae
Han, Seong Woo
Lee, Namho
Clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after second- or third-generation drug-eluting stent insertion in clinically stable patients
title Clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after second- or third-generation drug-eluting stent insertion in clinically stable patients
title_full Clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after second- or third-generation drug-eluting stent insertion in clinically stable patients
title_fullStr Clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after second- or third-generation drug-eluting stent insertion in clinically stable patients
title_full_unstemmed Clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after second- or third-generation drug-eluting stent insertion in clinically stable patients
title_short Clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after second- or third-generation drug-eluting stent insertion in clinically stable patients
title_sort clinical impact of routine follow-up coronary angiography after second- or third-generation drug-eluting stent insertion in clinically stable patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4293563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25589835
http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2015.30.1.49
work_keys_str_mv AT choiseonghoon clinicalimpactofroutinefollowupcoronaryangiographyaftersecondorthirdgenerationdrugelutingstentinsertioninclinicallystablepatients
AT munheesun clinicalimpactofroutinefollowupcoronaryangiographyaftersecondorthirdgenerationdrugelutingstentinsertioninclinicallystablepatients
AT kangminkyung clinicalimpactofroutinefollowupcoronaryangiographyaftersecondorthirdgenerationdrugelutingstentinsertioninclinicallystablepatients
AT chojungrae clinicalimpactofroutinefollowupcoronaryangiographyaftersecondorthirdgenerationdrugelutingstentinsertioninclinicallystablepatients
AT hanseongwoo clinicalimpactofroutinefollowupcoronaryangiographyaftersecondorthirdgenerationdrugelutingstentinsertioninclinicallystablepatients
AT leenamho clinicalimpactofroutinefollowupcoronaryangiographyaftersecondorthirdgenerationdrugelutingstentinsertioninclinicallystablepatients