Cargando…

Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to determine whether percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) techniques are advantageous over surgical tracheostomy (ST), and if one PT technique is superior to the others. METHODS: Computerized databases (1966 to 2013) were searched for rand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Putensen, Christian, Theuerkauf, Nils, Guenther, Ulf, Vargas, Maria, Pelosi, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4293819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25526983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0544-7
_version_ 1782352652281053184
author Putensen, Christian
Theuerkauf, Nils
Guenther, Ulf
Vargas, Maria
Pelosi, Paolo
author_facet Putensen, Christian
Theuerkauf, Nils
Guenther, Ulf
Vargas, Maria
Pelosi, Paolo
author_sort Putensen, Christian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to determine whether percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) techniques are advantageous over surgical tracheostomy (ST), and if one PT technique is superior to the others. METHODS: Computerized databases (1966 to 2013) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting complications as predefined endpoints and comparing PT and ST and among the different PT techniques in mechanically ventilated adult critically ill patients. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI), and I(2) values were estimated. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs tested PT techniques versus ST in 973 patients. PT techniques were performed faster (MD, −13.06 minutes (95% CI, −19.37 to −6.76 (P <0.0001)); I(2) = 97% (P <0.00001)) and reduced odds for stoma inflammation (OR, 0.38 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.76 (P = 0.006)); I(2) = 2% (P = 0.36)), and infection (OR, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.41 (P <0.00001)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.54)), but increased odds for procedural technical difficulties (OR, 4.58 (95% CI, 2.21 to 9.47 (P <0.0001)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.63)). PT techniques reduced odds for postprocedural major bleeding (OR, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.97 (P = 0.04)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.69)), but not when a single RCT using translaryngeal tracheostomy was excluded (OR, 0.58 (95% CI, 0.21 to 1.63 (P = 0.30)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.89)). Eight RCTs compared different PT techniques in 700 patients. Multiple (MDT) and single step (SSDT) dilatator techniques are associated with the lowest odds for difficult dilatation or cannula insertion (OR, 0.30 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.80 (P = 0.02)); I(2) = 56% (P = 0.03)) and major intraprocedural bleeding (OR, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.85 (P = 0.02)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.72)), compared to the guide wire dilatation forceps technique. CONCLUSION: In critically ill adult patients, PT techniques can be performed faster and reduce stoma inflammation and infection but are associated with increased technical difficulties when compared to ST. Among PT techniques, MDT and SSDT were associated with the lowest intraprocedural risks and seem to be preferable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0544-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4293819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-42938192015-01-15 Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis Putensen, Christian Theuerkauf, Nils Guenther, Ulf Vargas, Maria Pelosi, Paolo Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to determine whether percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) techniques are advantageous over surgical tracheostomy (ST), and if one PT technique is superior to the others. METHODS: Computerized databases (1966 to 2013) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting complications as predefined endpoints and comparing PT and ST and among the different PT techniques in mechanically ventilated adult critically ill patients. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI), and I(2) values were estimated. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs tested PT techniques versus ST in 973 patients. PT techniques were performed faster (MD, −13.06 minutes (95% CI, −19.37 to −6.76 (P <0.0001)); I(2) = 97% (P <0.00001)) and reduced odds for stoma inflammation (OR, 0.38 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.76 (P = 0.006)); I(2) = 2% (P = 0.36)), and infection (OR, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.41 (P <0.00001)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.54)), but increased odds for procedural technical difficulties (OR, 4.58 (95% CI, 2.21 to 9.47 (P <0.0001)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.63)). PT techniques reduced odds for postprocedural major bleeding (OR, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.97 (P = 0.04)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.69)), but not when a single RCT using translaryngeal tracheostomy was excluded (OR, 0.58 (95% CI, 0.21 to 1.63 (P = 0.30)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.89)). Eight RCTs compared different PT techniques in 700 patients. Multiple (MDT) and single step (SSDT) dilatator techniques are associated with the lowest odds for difficult dilatation or cannula insertion (OR, 0.30 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.80 (P = 0.02)); I(2) = 56% (P = 0.03)) and major intraprocedural bleeding (OR, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.85 (P = 0.02)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.72)), compared to the guide wire dilatation forceps technique. CONCLUSION: In critically ill adult patients, PT techniques can be performed faster and reduce stoma inflammation and infection but are associated with increased technical difficulties when compared to ST. Among PT techniques, MDT and SSDT were associated with the lowest intraprocedural risks and seem to be preferable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0544-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-19 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4293819/ /pubmed/25526983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0544-7 Text en © Putensen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Putensen, Christian
Theuerkauf, Nils
Guenther, Ulf
Vargas, Maria
Pelosi, Paolo
Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis
title Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis
title_full Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis
title_short Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis
title_sort percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4293819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25526983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0544-7
work_keys_str_mv AT putensenchristian percutaneousandsurgicaltracheostomyincriticallyilladultpatientsametaanalysis
AT theuerkaufnils percutaneousandsurgicaltracheostomyincriticallyilladultpatientsametaanalysis
AT guentherulf percutaneousandsurgicaltracheostomyincriticallyilladultpatientsametaanalysis
AT vargasmaria percutaneousandsurgicaltracheostomyincriticallyilladultpatientsametaanalysis
AT pelosipaolo percutaneousandsurgicaltracheostomyincriticallyilladultpatientsametaanalysis