Cargando…
Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to determine whether percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) techniques are advantageous over surgical tracheostomy (ST), and if one PT technique is superior to the others. METHODS: Computerized databases (1966 to 2013) were searched for rand...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4293819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25526983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0544-7 |
_version_ | 1782352652281053184 |
---|---|
author | Putensen, Christian Theuerkauf, Nils Guenther, Ulf Vargas, Maria Pelosi, Paolo |
author_facet | Putensen, Christian Theuerkauf, Nils Guenther, Ulf Vargas, Maria Pelosi, Paolo |
author_sort | Putensen, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to determine whether percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) techniques are advantageous over surgical tracheostomy (ST), and if one PT technique is superior to the others. METHODS: Computerized databases (1966 to 2013) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting complications as predefined endpoints and comparing PT and ST and among the different PT techniques in mechanically ventilated adult critically ill patients. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI), and I(2) values were estimated. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs tested PT techniques versus ST in 973 patients. PT techniques were performed faster (MD, −13.06 minutes (95% CI, −19.37 to −6.76 (P <0.0001)); I(2) = 97% (P <0.00001)) and reduced odds for stoma inflammation (OR, 0.38 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.76 (P = 0.006)); I(2) = 2% (P = 0.36)), and infection (OR, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.41 (P <0.00001)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.54)), but increased odds for procedural technical difficulties (OR, 4.58 (95% CI, 2.21 to 9.47 (P <0.0001)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.63)). PT techniques reduced odds for postprocedural major bleeding (OR, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.97 (P = 0.04)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.69)), but not when a single RCT using translaryngeal tracheostomy was excluded (OR, 0.58 (95% CI, 0.21 to 1.63 (P = 0.30)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.89)). Eight RCTs compared different PT techniques in 700 patients. Multiple (MDT) and single step (SSDT) dilatator techniques are associated with the lowest odds for difficult dilatation or cannula insertion (OR, 0.30 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.80 (P = 0.02)); I(2) = 56% (P = 0.03)) and major intraprocedural bleeding (OR, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.85 (P = 0.02)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.72)), compared to the guide wire dilatation forceps technique. CONCLUSION: In critically ill adult patients, PT techniques can be performed faster and reduce stoma inflammation and infection but are associated with increased technical difficulties when compared to ST. Among PT techniques, MDT and SSDT were associated with the lowest intraprocedural risks and seem to be preferable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0544-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4293819 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-42938192015-01-15 Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis Putensen, Christian Theuerkauf, Nils Guenther, Ulf Vargas, Maria Pelosi, Paolo Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to determine whether percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) techniques are advantageous over surgical tracheostomy (ST), and if one PT technique is superior to the others. METHODS: Computerized databases (1966 to 2013) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting complications as predefined endpoints and comparing PT and ST and among the different PT techniques in mechanically ventilated adult critically ill patients. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI), and I(2) values were estimated. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs tested PT techniques versus ST in 973 patients. PT techniques were performed faster (MD, −13.06 minutes (95% CI, −19.37 to −6.76 (P <0.0001)); I(2) = 97% (P <0.00001)) and reduced odds for stoma inflammation (OR, 0.38 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.76 (P = 0.006)); I(2) = 2% (P = 0.36)), and infection (OR, 0.22 (95% CI, 0.11 to 0.41 (P <0.00001)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.54)), but increased odds for procedural technical difficulties (OR, 4.58 (95% CI, 2.21 to 9.47 (P <0.0001)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.63)). PT techniques reduced odds for postprocedural major bleeding (OR, 0.39 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.97 (P = 0.04)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.69)), but not when a single RCT using translaryngeal tracheostomy was excluded (OR, 0.58 (95% CI, 0.21 to 1.63 (P = 0.30)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.89)). Eight RCTs compared different PT techniques in 700 patients. Multiple (MDT) and single step (SSDT) dilatator techniques are associated with the lowest odds for difficult dilatation or cannula insertion (OR, 0.30 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.80 (P = 0.02)); I(2) = 56% (P = 0.03)) and major intraprocedural bleeding (OR, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.85 (P = 0.02)); I(2) = 0% (P = 0.72)), compared to the guide wire dilatation forceps technique. CONCLUSION: In critically ill adult patients, PT techniques can be performed faster and reduce stoma inflammation and infection but are associated with increased technical difficulties when compared to ST. Among PT techniques, MDT and SSDT were associated with the lowest intraprocedural risks and seem to be preferable. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0544-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-12-19 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4293819/ /pubmed/25526983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0544-7 Text en © Putensen et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Putensen, Christian Theuerkauf, Nils Guenther, Ulf Vargas, Maria Pelosi, Paolo Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis |
title | Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4293819/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25526983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0544-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT putensenchristian percutaneousandsurgicaltracheostomyincriticallyilladultpatientsametaanalysis AT theuerkaufnils percutaneousandsurgicaltracheostomyincriticallyilladultpatientsametaanalysis AT guentherulf percutaneousandsurgicaltracheostomyincriticallyilladultpatientsametaanalysis AT vargasmaria percutaneousandsurgicaltracheostomyincriticallyilladultpatientsametaanalysis AT pelosipaolo percutaneousandsurgicaltracheostomyincriticallyilladultpatientsametaanalysis |